Semantic priming: Subliminal perception or context?

Briefly presented, masked priming stimuli that cannot be identified by themselves can affect the processing of subsequent targets. The effect, which is sometimes viewed as a demonstration of unconscious processing, has been linked to the subliminal perception literature. Experiments 1 and 2 indicated that the identification of primes in the context of semantically related targets is superior to the identification of primes presented alone, and that the identification of primes in the context of semantically unrelated targets is inferior to the identification of primes presented alone. Experiment 3 indicated parallel findings in a recognition task. Consequently, an explanation of semantic priming in terms of the interactive nature of stimuli that are near to one another in time seems preferable to one based upon concepts of unconscious processing and subliminal perception.

[1]  John A. Swets,et al.  Stimulus vs Response Uncertainty in Recognition , 1961 .

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[3]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Lexical access with and without awareness , 1981 .

[4]  A. Marcel.  Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[6]  P. Merikle,et al.  Priming with and without awareness , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  A. Marcel.  Conscious and preconscious recognition on polysemous words: Locating selective effects of prior verbal contexts , 1980 .

[8]  D G Purcell,et al.  Another look at semantic priming without awareness , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  P. Merikle,et al.  Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[10]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  T. Natsoulas.  What are perceptual reports about? , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Discrimination and learning without awareness: a methodological survey and evaluation. , 1960, Psychological review.

[13]  Broadbent De.  Word-frequency effect and response bias. , 1967 .

[14]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Accuracy of recognition with alternatives before and after the stimulus. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  A G Greenwald,et al.  Unconscious processing of dichoptically masked words , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[16]  J. Pierce.  SOME SOURCES OF ARTIFACT IN STUDIES OF THE TACHISTOSCOPIC PERCEPTION OF WORDS. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  T H Carr,et al.  Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  A. Marcel.  Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Daniel Holender,et al.  Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  V. J. Dark,et al.  Semantic priming, prime reportability, and retroactive priming are interdependent , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[21]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[22]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Perceptual independence: definitions, models, and experimental paradigms. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual perceptual processing rates and backward and forward masking. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Metacontrast inferred from reaction time and verbal report: replication and comments on the Fehrer-Biederman experiment. , 1973, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[25]  David Hines,et al.  Automatic semantic priming: Effect of category exemplar level and word association level. , 1986 .

[26]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[27]  T. Carr,et al.  Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Word predictability and intelligibility , 1963 .

[29]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.

[30]  P. Merikle,et al.  Unconscious perception revisited , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  E. Tulving,et al.  STIMULUS INFORMATION AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION AS DETERMINANTS OF TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION OF WORDS. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  K. Briand,et al.  Retroactive Semantic Priming in a Lexical Decision Task , 1988 .

[33]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[34]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Intelligibility of Known and Unknown Message Sets , 1959 .