Single-Trial Classification of MEG Recordings

While magnetoencephalography (MEG) is widely used to identify spatial locations of brain activations associated with various tasks, classification of single trials in stimulus-locked experiments remains an open subject. Very significant single-trial classification results have been published using electroencephalogram (EEG) data, but in the MEG case, the weakness of the magnetic fields originating from the relevant sources relative to external noise, and the high dimensionality of the data are difficult obstacles to overcome. We present here very significant MEG single-trial mean classification rates of words. The number of words classified varied from seven to nine and both visual and auditory modalities were studied. These results were obtained by using a variety of blind sources separation methods: spatial principal components analysis (PCA), Infomax independent components analysis (Infomax ICA) and second-order blind identification (SOBI). The sources obtained were classified using two methods, linear discriminant classification (LDC) and nu-support vector machine (nu-SVM). The data used here, auditory and visual presentations of words, presented nontrivial classification problems, but with Infomax ICA associated with LDC we obtained high classification rates. Our best single-trial mean classification rate was 60.1% for classification of 900 single trials of nine auditory words. On two-class problems rates were as high as 97.5%

[1]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[2]  LinChih-Jen,et al.  A tutorial on -support vector machines , 2005 .

[3]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  A brain computer interface with online feedback based on magnetoencephalography , 2005, ICML.

[4]  Federico Girosi,et al.  Support Vector Machines: Training and Applications , 1997 .

[5]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Independent components of magnetoencephalography: Localization and single-trial response onset detection , 2002 .

[7]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[8]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Classifying Event-Related Desynchronization in EEG, ECoG and MEG Signals , 2006, DAGM-Symposium.

[10]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent Component Analysis Using an Extended Infomax Algorithm for Mixed Subgaussian and Supergaussian Sources , 1999, Neural Computation.

[11]  Eric Moulines,et al.  A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[12]  Christopher J James,et al.  Independent component analysis for biomedical signals , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[13]  C. Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Object representation and gamma oscillations , 2001 .

[14]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on ν-support vector machines: Research Articles , 2005 .

[15]  A. J. Bell,et al.  INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF BIOMEDICAL SIGNALS , 2000 .

[16]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  New Support Vector Algorithms , 2000, Neural Computation.

[17]  J. Shao Linear Model Selection by Cross-validation , 1993 .

[18]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[19]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent Component Analysis for Identification of Artifacts in Magnetoencephalographic Recordings , 1997, NIPS.

[20]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Neural Network Classification of Word Evoked Neuromagnetic Brain Activity , 2001, Emergent Neural Computational Architectures Based on Neuroscience.

[21]  R.Quian Quiroga,et al.  Obtaining single stimulus evoked potentials with wavelet denoising , 2000, nlin/0006027.

[22]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[23]  D. Regan,et al.  Human brain electrophysiology , 1989 .

[24]  Juyang Weng,et al.  Using Discriminant Eigenfeatures for Image Retrieval , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[25]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Characterization of a Family of Algorithms for Generalized Discriminant Analysis on Undersampled Problems , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[26]  Stephen J. Roberts,et al.  Adaptive BCI based on variational Bayesian Kalman filtering: an empirical evaluation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Antoine Souloumiac,et al.  Jacobi Angles for Simultaneous Diagonalization , 1996, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[28]  P Suppes,et al.  Brain wave recognition of words. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  P. de Chazal,et al.  Parametric models and spectral analysis for classification in brain-computer interfaces , 2002, 2002 14th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing Proceedings. DSP 2002 (Cat. No.02TH8628).

[30]  Shiro Ikeda,et al.  Independent component analysis for noisy data -- MEG data analysis , 2000, Neural Networks.

[31]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[32]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Linear and nonlinear methods for brain-computer interfaces , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[33]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[34]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Spectral spatiotemporal imaging of cortical oscillations and interactions in the human brain , 2004, NeuroImage.