Processing of identity and conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livid)

As a test of differential processing of identity and conditional relations, subjects were first highly trained on 0-sec delay identity matching (IM) and conditional (“symbolic”) matching (CM), with the same pair of stimuli serving as samples in both tasks. CM probe trials were then randomly interspersed among baseline IM trials and vice versa. The differences in response latencies obtained on the probe and baseline trials provided the critical data. It was argued that differential processing of identity and conditional relations should result in a larger difference in response latency when CM probes were interspersed among IM baseline trials than when the reverse assignment was made. This pattern was found in cebus monkeys but not in pigeons. The results provide further evidence for the matching concept in monkeys, and they support the view that the matching concept is at best only weakly represented in pigeons.

[1]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Retrospective and Prospective Processing in Animal Working Memory , 1982 .

[2]  Robert A. Boakes,et al.  Transfer of Relational Rules in Matching and Oddity Learning by Pigeons and Corvids , 1985 .

[3]  C. L. Morgan An introduction to comparative psychology , 1900 .

[4]  M R D'Amato,et al.  Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[5]  Milner Ad Matching within and between sense modalities in the monkey (Macaca mulatta). , 1973 .

[6]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[7]  D. Zerbolio Further avoidance studies with goldfish: Brightness discrimination and transposition , 1985 .

[8]  M. Colombo,et al.  Auditory matching-to-sample in monkeys (Cebus apella) , 1985 .

[9]  P. W. Holmes Transfer of matching performance in pigeons. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  D E Carter,et al.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  M. R. D’amato,et al.  Retrieval cues and short-term memory in capuchin monkeys. , 1974 .

[12]  D. Brillinger,et al.  Multivariate Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1964 .

[13]  M R D'Amato,et al.  Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  R. J. Herrnstein,et al.  Riddles of natural categorization , 1985 .

[15]  Larry B. Wallnau,et al.  Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1985 .

[16]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Matching and Oddity Learning in the Pigeon: Transfer Effects and the Absence of Relational Learning , 1985 .

[17]  D. J. Zerbolio,et al.  Matching and oddity conditional discrimination in the goldfish as avoidance responses: Evidence for conceptual avoidance learning , 1983 .

[18]  David Premack,et al.  The codes of man and beasts , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.