Technology progress in the Chinese construction industry under the iron-fist of government

Government policies and actions in transitional economies have far-reaching consequences for technology progress. Many studies suggest the important role of governments in providing policies and finance to facilitate technology innovations. The Chinese government has often been seen to exemplify this. This article probes government actions in practice, the way it is conducted and the negative consequences for innovation. We focus on one of China's most important and successful sectors – construction. An analytical framework based on ‘complex systems industry’ is used and a causal map developed to examine the role of the Chinese government acting as client, regulator and administrator of industrial and professional bodies and their impact on innovation in the construction sector. This paper confirms that innovation is industry specific and social and economic context dependent. While recognising the powerful role of the Chinese government, it argues that in reality the ‘Chinese government’ is not a uniform entity, but rather consists of various entities acting in accordance with their varied vested interests at a specific time and under particular circumstances.

[1]  M. Hobday,et al.  Innovation in Complex Systems Industries: the Case of Flight Simulation , 1995 .

[2]  A. Davies,et al.  Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions , 2000 .

[3]  David Gann,et al.  Should governments fund construction research , 1997 .

[4]  James Stewart,et al.  From 3G to 4G: standards and the development of mobile broadband in China , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  Sonia M. L. Wong,et al.  Developmental State and Corporate Governance in China , 2007, Management and Organization Review.

[6]  Shaomin Li,et al.  When iron fist, visible hand, and invisible hand meet: Firm-level effects of varying institutional environments in China , 2007 .

[7]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[8]  Lorraine Eden,et al.  Government Corruption and the Entry Strategies of Multinationals , 2005 .

[9]  David R. King,et al.  The impact of government policy on technology transfer: an aircraft industry case study , 2003 .

[10]  Arie Y. Lewin,et al.  Management and Organization Review , 2013 .

[11]  Andrew Davies,et al.  The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems , 2005 .

[12]  Denise Bower,et al.  Development Strategies for Chinese Design Institutes , 2004 .

[13]  Gregory A. Bigley,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON HOW GOVERMENTS MATTER , 2005 .

[14]  Amy J. Hillman,et al.  The Attractiveness of Political Markets: Implications for Firm Strategy , 2005 .

[15]  Graham M. Winch,et al.  The Organization of Innovation Brokers: An International Review , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[16]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Business and government interdependence in China: Cooperative goals to develop industries and the marketplace , 2008 .

[17]  John E. Prescott,et al.  Deregulatory Forms, Variations in the Speed of Governance Adaptation, and Firm Performance , 2005 .

[18]  S. G. Allen,et al.  Why Construction Industry Productivity is Declining , 1985 .

[19]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Technology Commercialization in Road Infrastructure: How Government Affects the Variation and Appropriability of Technology , 2008 .

[20]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategy in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[21]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Taking Stock and Looking Ahead: MOR and Chinese Management Research , 2007, Management and Organization Review.

[22]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Major characteristics of constructed products and resulting limitations of construction technology , 1988 .

[23]  Paul Gardiner,et al.  Tough customers: good designs , 1985 .

[24]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[25]  Jone L. Pearce,et al.  How we can Learn How Governments Matter to Management and Organization , 2001 .

[26]  Mark Konchar,et al.  Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems , 1998 .

[27]  Qiwen Lu,et al.  The organization of innovation in a transitional economy: business and government in Chinese electronic publishing , 2001 .

[28]  Michael Hobday,et al.  The Business of Projects: List of figures , 2005 .

[29]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Rationales for Government Intervention in the Commercialization of New Technologies , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[30]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  The influence of government science and technology policies on new product development in the USA, UK, South Korea and Taiwan , 1998 .

[31]  Michael Hobday,et al.  The Business of Projects by Andrew Davies , 2005 .

[32]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[33]  Jennifer W. Spencer,et al.  How Governments Matter to New Industry Creation , 2005 .

[34]  Barbara Krug,et al.  Framing China: Transformation and Institutional Change through Co-evolution , 2008, Management and Organization Review.