The impact of reversibility on the decision to disclose personal information

Purpose This paper aims to examine how reversibility in disclosing personal information – that is, having (vs not having) to option to later revise or retract personal information – can impact consumers’ willingness to divulge personal information. Design/methodology/approach Three studies examined how informing consumers they may (reversible condition) or may not (irreversible condition) revise their personal information in the future affected their propensity to disclose personal information, compared to a control condition. Findings Study 1 (which included three experiments with different time intervals between initial and revised disclosure) showed that consumers disclose less in both the reversible and irreversible conditions, compared to the control condition. Studies 2 and 3 showed that this is because consumers treat reversibility as a cue to the sensitivity of the information they are asked to divulge, and that leads them to disclose less when reversibility or irreversibility is made explicitly salient beforehand. Practical implications As many marketers are interested in hoarding consumers’ personal information, privacy advocates call for methods that would ensure careful and well-informed disclosure. Offering reversibility to a decision to disclose personal information, or merely pointing out the irreversibility of that decision, can make consumers reevaluate the sensitivity of the situation, leading to more careful disclosures. Originality/value Although previous research on reversibility in consumer behavior focused on product return policies and showed that reversibility increases purchases, none have studied how reversibility affects self-disclosure and how it can decrease it.

[1]  J. Förster,et al.  Keeping one's options open: The detrimental consequences of decision reversibility , 2011 .

[2]  Daniel R. Horne,et al.  The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors , 2007 .

[3]  Wendy Schneier Siegal,et al.  The Impact of the Prechoice Process on Product Returns , 2005 .

[4]  Ulrike Malmendier,et al.  Paying Not to Go to the Gym , 2006 .

[5]  Stacy L. Wood Remote Purchase Environments: The Influence of Return Policy Leniency on Two-Stage Decision Processes , 2001 .

[6]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Decisions and revisions: the affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Mikko Tapani Karaiste Delete: The virtue of forgetting in the digital age , 2010 .

[8]  J. Frattaroli Experimental disclosure and its moderators: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Marco Loregian,et al.  Much undo about nothing?: investigating why email retraction is less popular than apologizing , 2008, NordiCHI.

[10]  Orly Sade,et al.  Does The Option to Cancel an Order in a Double Auction Market Matter , 2004 .

[11]  Youngme Moon Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers , 2000 .

[12]  Randall L. Schultz,et al.  Product Returns on the Internet: A Case of Mixed Signals? , 2010 .

[13]  Ayman Farahat,et al.  How effective is targeted advertising? , 2012, 2013 American Control Conference.

[14]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Privacy and human behavior in the age of information , 2015, Science.

[15]  Wen Zhang,et al.  How much can behavioral targeting help online advertising? , 2009, WWW '09.

[16]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Misplaced Confidences , 2013, WEIS.

[18]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Suppressing Secrecy Through Metacognitive Ease , 2009, Psychological science.

[19]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Survey research and societal change. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[21]  J. Petersen,et al.  Are Product Returns a Necessary Evil? Antecedents and Consequences , 2009 .

[22]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[23]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Strangers on a Plane: Context-Dependent Willingness to Divulge Sensitive Information , 2011 .

[24]  Chanhoo Song,et al.  Consumers' Privacy Concerns and Willingness to Provide Marketing-Related Personal Information Online , 2006 .

[25]  Bettina Berendt,et al.  E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior , 2001, EC '01.

[26]  W. F. V. Raaij,et al.  The effects of direct experience on consumer product evaluation , 2009 .

[27]  Stuart Hannabuss Truth, Lies and Trust on the Internet , 2010 .