Demographic characteristics of veterans who received wheelchairs and scooters from Veterans Health Administration.

Little is known about the reasoning process clinicians use when prescribing wheeled mobility equipment (WME) or about the outcomes of this process, i.e., how many devices are prescribed, to whom, how often, and at what cost. This study characterized veterans who received WME from the Veterans Health Administration. We analyzed variance in wheelchair provision based on sex, race/ethnicity, diagnosis, and age. Three years of data from the National Prosthetics Patient Database and the National Patient Care Database were merged, yielding more than 77,000 observations per fiscal year. Logistic regression analysis revealed associations between WME provision and age, sex, and race/ethnicity, when analysis was controlled for diagnosis and number of comorbidities. Hispanics (odds ratio [OR] = 1.864), African Americans (OR = 1.360), and American Indians/Asians (OR = 1.585) were more likely than Caucasians to receive standard wheelchairs. Hispanics (OR = 0.4), African Americans (OR = 0.7), and American Indians/Asians (OR = 0.4) were less likely than Caucasians to receive scooters.

[1]  Stephen P Burns,et al.  Wheelchair configuration and postural alignment in persons with spinal cord injury. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  K. Berg,et al.  Receiving help at home: the interplay of human and technological assistance. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[3]  Marsha P. Johnson.  Statistical Methods for Health Care Research , 1996 .

[4]  M. Boninger,et al.  Development of the Seating and Mobility Script Concordance Test for Spinal Cord Injury: Obtaining Content Validity Evidence , 2005, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[5]  T. Baumgartner.  Reading Statistics and Research (5th ed.) , 2008 .

[6]  R A Cooper,et al.  Performance of selected lightweight wheelchairs on ANSI/RESNA tests. American National Standards Institute-Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  S. Allen,et al.  Targeting risk for unmet need: not enough help versus no help at all. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[8]  J. Perry,et al.  The effect of level of spinal cord injury on shoulder joint kinetics during manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Rory A. Cooper.  Wheelchair Selection and Configuration , 1998 .

[10]  C B Sledge,et al.  The weight-bearing shoulder. The impingement syndrome in paraplegics. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Tae-Gyung Kang,et al.  Mobility Device Use in the United States , 2003 .

[12]  N. Chappell,et al.  Mobility Restriction and the Use of Devices among Seniors , 1994 .

[13]  M. Boninger,et al.  Comparison of fatigue life for 3 types of manual wheelchairs. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  W. Mann,et al.  Racial differences of frail elders in assistive technology. , 1997, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[15]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Intelligent control of power wheelchairs , 1995 .

[16]  R. Battista.  Innovation and Diffusion of Health-Related Technologies: A Conceptual Framework , 1989, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[17]  R. Rubin,et al.  Race, disability and assistive devices: sociodemographics or discrimination , 2001 .

[18]  H E Veeger,et al.  Biomechanics and physiology in active manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  R A Cooper,et al.  Shoulder imaging abnormalities in individuals with paraplegia. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  R. Waters,et al.  Late complications of the weight-bearing upper extremity in the paraplegic patient. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  Aaron L. Souza,et al.  Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  R A Cooper,et al.  Manual wheelchair pushrim biomechanics and axle position. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  J. Russell,et al.  Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994. , 1997, Advance data.

[24]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluation of selected electric-powered wheelchairs using the ANSI/RESNA standards. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Fatigue testing of selected suspension manual wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Helen Rogers,et al.  A comparison of functional mobility in standard vs. ultralight wheelchairs as measured by performance on a community obstacle course , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[27]  M. Boninger,et al.  Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  H. Hoenig,et al.  Activity Restriction Among Wheelchair Users , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[29]  Purvi Sevak,et al.  Use, type, and efficacy of assistance for disability. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[30]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Patient‐Reported Measures of Health: The Veterans Health Study , 2004, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[31]  R N Robertson,et al.  Pushrim forces and joint kinetics during wheelchair propulsion. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  Susan L Garber,et al.  Wheelchair utilization and satisfaction following cerebral vascular accident. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[33]  J. Thornby,et al.  Comparison of Carpal Canal Pressure in Paraplegic and Nonparaplegic Subjects: Clinical Implications , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[34]  E. C. Hodgman,et al.  A conceptual framework to guide nursing curriculum. , 1973, Nursing forum.

[35]  No More Kin: Exploring Race, Class, and Gender in Family Networks , 1997 .

[36]  L. Iezzoni.  Using administrative data to study persons with disabilities. , 2002, The Milbank quarterly.

[37]  Rory A. Cooper.  A perspective on the ultralight wheelchair revolution , 1996 .

[38]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with disparity in wheelchair customizability among people with traumatic spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  R A Cooper,et al.  An autoregressive modeling approach to analyzing wheelchair propulsion forces. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.