Ilium growth study: applicability in sex and age diagnosis.

The use of coxal elements for age and sex diagnosis from the skeleton is the primary and most widespread way of bringing us closer to the identity of dead individuals in archaeological and certain forensic scenarios. Diagnosis in sub-adults, especially in fetus and infant age, is not clear; and further studies are needed. This work presents the analysis of the growth of six variables in the ilium, from birth to 97 years of age, in order to evaluate its significance and its capacity for age and sex determination during and after growth. The materials used were 327 specimens from four documented Western European collections. Growth curves were calculated for the three classical variables of the ilium (width, length and index) and three new variables of the acetabulum area (horizontal and vertical diameter of the ilium acetabular surface and the ilium acetabular index). None of the curves showed a lineal growth, except those of the horizontal diameter of the ilium acetabular surface for the male series. The ilium width has the most complicated growth and it is explained by a four-degree polynomial. All the variables studied can be useful for adult sex discrimination with the exception of the ilium width and ilium acetabular index. Furthermore, the most useful variables for subadult and adult age estimation in archaeological samples, as well as in forensic samples, are the absolute measurements (ilium length and width, horizontal and vertical diameter of the ilium acetabular surface); however, the ilium width is the best variable, as this can be applied to all growth ages using both sexual series together up to 20 years of age.

[1]  Peter Dangerfield,et al.  Developmental Juvenile Osteology. By LOUISE SCHEUER and SUE BLACK. (Pp. x+587; fully illustrated; $159 hardback; ISBN 0 12 624000 0.) San Diego: Academic Press. 2000 , 2001 .

[2]  S. Genovés Diferencias sexuales en el hueso coxal , 1959 .

[3]  W. Straus, The human ilium: Sex and stock , 1927 .

[4]  A. Malgosa,et al.  Sex and age diagnosis by ischium morphometric analysis. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[5]  Carme Rissech Badalló Anàlisi del creixement del coxal a partir de material ossi i les seves aplicacions en la Medicina Forense i l'Antropologia , 2001 .

[6]  B. Boucher Sex differences in the foetal pelvis. , 1957, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  E. L. Reynolds The bony pelvic girdle in early infancy. A roentgenometric study , 1945 .

[8]  F. Kósa,et al.  Forensic fetal osteology , 1978 .

[9]  D. Weaver,et al.  Sex differences in the ilia of a known sex and age sample of fetal and infant skeletons. , 1980, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  J. Tanner,et al.  The adolescent growth spurt of boys and girls of the Harpenden growth study. , 1976, Annals of human biology.

[11]  A. Malgosa,et al.  The acetabular point: a morphological and ontogenetic study , 2001, Journal of anatomy.

[12]  A. Miles,et al.  Growth curves of immature bones from a Scottish island population of sixteenth to mid-nineteenth century: Shoulder girdle, ilium, pubis and ischium , 1995 .

[13]  W. H. Coleman,et al.  Sex differences in the growth of the human bony pelvis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  R. Hoppa Evaluating human skeletal growth: An Anglo‐Saxon example , 1992 .

[15]  E. L. Reynolds The bone pelvis in prepuberal childhood. , 1947, American journal of physical anthropology.

[16]  James M. Tanner,et al.  Growth at Adolescence , 1956 .