Objective: Many states are considering strengthening their graduated driving licensing (GDL) systems for teenage drivers but most do not know the level of public support for proposed upgrades. This study provides a method for states to identify specific demographic groups that may differ with regard to their awareness of teen driving risks, knowledge of current GDL law, and support for GDL upgrades. Methods: A 28-item questionnaire was administered to Connecticut adults by phone survey during January 2008. We collected demographic information and whether respondents understood driving risks, were aware of the current GDL system, and whether they would support GDL upgrades. The state's motor vehicle crash file (1999–2006) was used to calculate motor vehicle crash rate among 16- and 17-year-old drivers by town and correlate that with support for GDL upgrades. Results: Eight hundred seven people were interviewed. More women than men (92% vs. 86%, p < .05) and more parents than other adults (96% vs. 84%, p < .01) were aware of the current learner's permit law. Female respondents (55% vs. 43%, p < .01) and adults who were not parents (54% vs. 45%, p < .05) were more likely to support increasing the minimum driving age. Parents were more aware than other adults (91% vs. 73%, p < .01) of the supervised driving provision. Women were more supportive of a supervised driving upgrade (83% vs. 69, p < .01). There was more support for a night restriction upgrade among other adults than parents (59% vs. 51%, p < .05), and the lowest support was in affluent towns (38%). Two thirds supported a passenger restriction upgrade with no differences based upon sex or geographic location. There was less support for an increased penalties in Fairfield County when compared to all other counties (55% vs. 63%, p < .05) and more support in Hartford County versus all other counties (70% vs. 58%, p < .05). Conclusions: Parents of Connecticut teens were more knowledgeable of current law but less supportive of GDL upgrades compared to other adults. Women were more apt to favor GDL upgrades than men. This study identifies subgroups that can be targeted for prevention activities and illustrates a useful method to assess public support for GDL upgrades.
[1]
Allan F. Williams,et al.
VEHICLES DRIVEN BY TEENAGERS IN FOUR STATES
,
1999
.
[2]
David F Preusser,et al.
GDL then and now.
,
2007,
Journal of safety research.
[3]
Allan F Williams,et al.
Responses of teenagers and their parents to California's graduated licensing system.
,
2002,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[4]
Allan F. Williams,et al.
PARENTS' VIEWS OF DRIVER LICENSING PRACTICES IN THE UNITED STATES
,
1996
.
[5]
Allan F Williams,et al.
Teenage drivers: patterns of risk.
,
2003,
Journal of safety research.
[6]
A K Lund,et al.
Adults' Views of Laws That Limit Teenagers' Driving and Access to Alcohol
,
1986,
Journal of public health policy.
[7]
Allan F Williams,et al.
Parents' views of teen driving risks, the role of parents, and how they plan to manage the risks.
,
2006,
Journal of safety research.
[8]
A F Williams,et al.
Young driver risk factors: successful and unsuccessful approaches for dealing with them and an agenda for the future
,
2006,
Injury Prevention.
[9]
Jean T Shope,et al.
Graduated driver licensing: review of evaluation results since 2002.
,
2007,
Journal of safety research.
[10]
Neil K Chaudhary,et al.
Views of Connecticut Parents of Teens and Other Adults about Graduated Licensing Upgrades
,
2008,
Traffic injury prevention.
[11]
David F. Preusser,et al.
Views of Parents of Teenagers About Graduated Licensing After Experience with the Laws
,
2001
.
[12]
Anne T McCartt,et al.
Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade.
,
2007,
Journal of safety research.