Canopy leaf display effects on absorbed, transmitted, and reflected solar radiation

Abstract Diurnal measurements of reflected, transmitted, and absorbed solar radiation, over an 80–280° solar azimuth range, were compared for wheat, corn, cotton, and sorghum canopies to study the effects of crop leaf display on light penetration into plant stands. The diurnal transmitted radiation (400–700 nm) differed for these four crops, apparently due to inherent canopy architecture and stand structure differences. Diurnal reflectance curves for visible (630–690 nm) and near infrared (760–800 nm) were flat except for the infrared reflectance curve of wheat. Thus, transmitted radiation contained most of the spectral information about canopy architecture of the four crops. Measurements several times during the day may be needed to reliably estimate daily absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) for generally erectophile crops such as wheat whereas for planophile crops such as cotton, whose leaves are closely and compactly spaced in the canopy, measurements close to solar noon may characterize the canopy. These results suggest that APAR estimates used in crop growth models may be in error, depending on canopy characteristics if based solely on reflectance and transmittance measurements near solar noon.

[1]  S. Idso,et al.  Wheat spectral reflectance: interactions between crop configuration, sun elevation, and azimuth angle. , 1979, Applied Optics.

[2]  J. Aase Relationship Between Leaf Area and Dry Matter in Winter Wheat1 , 1978 .

[3]  C. S. T. Daughtry,et al.  Techniques for Measuring Intercepted and Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation in Corn Canopies1 , 1986 .

[4]  R. D. Jackson,et al.  Sun-angle and canopy-architecture effects on the spectral reflectance of six wheat cultivars , 1985 .

[5]  A. Richardson,et al.  Measurement of reflectance factors under daily and intermittent irradiance variations. , 1981, Applied optics.

[6]  C. Jordan Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor , 1969 .

[7]  Method for Calculating the Photosynthetic Response of a Crop to Light Intensity and Leaf Temperature by an Energy Flow Analysis of the Meteorological Parameters1 , 1967 .

[8]  Ray D. Jackson,et al.  Diurnal Patterns of Wheat Spectral Reflectances , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  C. T. Wit Photosynthesis of leaf canopies , 1965 .

[10]  Ghassem R. Asrar,et al.  Assessing solar energy and water use efficiencies in winter wheat: A case study , 1982 .

[11]  R. Walraven Calculating the position of the sun , 1978 .

[12]  G. F. Arkin,et al.  A Light Interception Method for Measuring Row Crop Ground Cover , 1977 .

[13]  C. Wiegand,et al.  Modelling planting configuration and canopy architecture effects on diurnal light absorption changes in cotton , 1988 .

[14]  John B. Schutt,et al.  A laboratory investigation of a physical rnechanisim for the extended infrared absorption ('red shift') in wheat , 1984 .

[15]  D. J. Fitter,et al.  STAND STRUCTURE AND LIGHT PENETRATION , 1980 .

[16]  R. Jackson Total reflected solar radiation calculated from multi-band sensor data , 1984 .

[17]  Kenneth J. Ranson,et al.  Interpreting vegetation reflectance measurements as a function of solar zenith angle , 1979 .

[18]  Margaret C. Anderson Stand Structure and Light Penetration. II. A Theoretical Analysis , 1966 .