Pilot of a theoretically grounded psychologist‐delivered intervention for fear of cancer recurrence (Conquer Fear)

Dear Editor,IntroductionFear of cancer recurrence (FCR), defined as the fear orworry that cancer could return or progress in the sameplace or another part of the body [1], is a commonand debilitating problem among cancer survivors. A re-cent systematic review found that across different cancersites and assessment strategies, the following on aver-age: 73% of cancer survivors report some degree ofFCR (range=39–97%); 49% report moderate to highFCR (range=22–87%); and 7% report high FCR(range=0–15%) [2]. FCR is stable over time and hasbeen shown to impact negatively on quality of life(QOL), psychological adjustment, emotional distressand anxiety, ability to establish future plans and carerQOL [2]. High FCR has also been associated withgreater medical service usage and costs [2]. Despitethe high prevalence, morbidity and potential cost ofFCR, survivors commonly report strong unmet needsfor help managing FCR [2]. This suggests many cancerservices are currently providing inadequate care in thisarea. Indeed, clinicians in psycho-oncology report diffi-culties dealing with high FCR [3]. There is a clear needfor interventions specifically targeting FCR, but veryfew have been developed and evaluated to date [4–6].This paper reports on the pilot testing of a novel, theo-retically based intervention for FCR.MethodsInterventionThe manualised intervention (Conquer Fear) aims to re-duce the impact of FCR and is based on the common-sense model (CSM) of illness [7], self-regulatory execu-tive function (S-REF) model [8] and Relational FrameTheory (RFT) [9]. Key intervention objectives includethe following: (a) teaching strategies for controllingworry and excessive threat monitoring (S-REF), (b)modifying unhelpful beliefs about worry (S-REF), (c)developing appropriate monitoring and screeningbehaviours (CSM), (d) providing information aboutfollow-up care and empirically supported behaviouralchange (e.g. weight loss and exercise) to reduce riskof recurrence (CSM), (e) addressing cancer-related exis-tential changes (RFT), and (f) promoting values-basedgoal-setting (RFT). The intervention comprises five60–90 min, individual face-to-face sessions with atrained psychologist/psychiatrist (therapist). Home-basedpractice and reading (≈2 h/week) is encouraged to con-solidate skills. See Table 1 for an overview of sessioncontent. More details are provided in Butow et al. [10].Study designThe feasibility, acceptability and likely efficacy ofConquer Fear were evaluated in a small longitudinalsingle-arm pilot study approved by relevant local ethicscommittees.

[1]  Z. Rosberger,et al.  Addressing fear of cancer recurrence among women with cancer: a feasibility and preliminary outcome study , 2014, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[2]  P. Butow,et al.  Current approaches to managing fear of cancer recurrence; a descriptive survey of psychosocial and clinical health professionals , 2014, Psycho-oncology.

[3]  C. Mihalopoulos,et al.  Conquer fear: protocol of a randomised controlled trial of a psychological intervention to reduce fear of cancer recurrence , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[4]  Gerry Humphris,et al.  Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of quantitative studies , 2013, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[5]  A. Dinkel,et al.  Evaluation of two group therapies to reduce fear of progression in cancer patients , 2010, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[6]  D. Osoba,et al.  Meta-analysis provides evidence-based effect sizes for a cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, the FACT-G. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  J. Savard,et al.  Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory: development and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of fear of cancer recurrence , 2009, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[8]  G. Humphris,et al.  The AFTER intervention: a structured psychological approach to reduce fears of recurrence in patients with head and neck cancer. , 2008, British journal of health psychology.

[9]  G. Norman,et al.  The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look , 2004, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[10]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[11]  A. Wells,et al.  Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: the S-REF model. , 1996, Behaviour research and therapy.

[12]  Howard Leventhal,et al.  Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions , 1992, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[13]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  M. Horowitz,et al.  Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress , 1979, Psychosomatic medicine.

[15]  S. Hayes,et al.  Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. , 2006, Behaviour research and therapy.

[16]  Suzanne M. Johnson Vickberg,et al.  The concerns about recurrence scale (CARS): A systematic measure of women’s fears about the possibility of breast cancer recurrence , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.