The Role of Emotion and Cognition in Juror Perceptions of Victim Impact Statements

[1]  R. Cramer,et al.  Juror perceptions of African American- and Arabic-named victims , 2013 .

[2]  S. I. Kramer Principles and Practice of Trial Consultation , 2013 .

[3]  A. Pemberton,et al.  Heterogeneity in victim participation: A new perspective on delivering a Victim Impact Statement , 2013 .

[4]  S. Brodsky,et al.  Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions. , 2012, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[5]  Dario N. Rodriguez,et al.  The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario , 2011 .

[6]  Meiring de Villiers The Impartiality Doctrine: Constitutional Meaning and Judicial Impact , 2011 .

[7]  D. Mancini The CSI Effect Reconsidered: Is It Moderated by Need for Cognition? , 2011 .

[8]  R. Paternoster,et al.  A HEAVY THUMB ON THE SCALE: THE EFFECT OF VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE ON CAPITAL DECISION MAKING* , 2011 .

[9]  M. Bourgeois,et al.  Anger as a cue to truthfulness , 2010 .

[10]  P. Cassell In Defense of Victim Impact Statements , 2009 .

[11]  C. Haney,et al.  Capital Jury Deliberation: Effects on Death Sentencing, Comprehension, and Discrimination , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[12]  B. Bottoms,et al.  Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law. , 2009, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[13]  J. Lieberman,et al.  The effects of labelling, expert testimony, and information processing mode on juror decisions in SVP civil commitment trials , 2009 .

[14]  B. Bornstein,et al.  Emotion and the Law: A Field Whose Time Has Come , 2009 .

[15]  Charles Doyle Crime Victims' Rights Act , 2008 .

[16]  B. McAuliff,et al.  Juror need for cognition and sensitivity to methodological flaws in expert evidence , 2008 .

[17]  Joel D. Lieberman,et al.  Determining dangerousness in sexually violent predator evaluations: cognitive-experiential self-theory and juror judgments of expert testimony. , 2007, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[18]  S. Brodsky,et al.  The Influence of Victim Impact Statements on Sentencing in Capital Cases , 2007 .

[19]  S. Szmania,et al.  Addressing the Court, the Offender, and the Community: A Communication Analysis of Victim Impact Statements in a Non-Capital Sentencing Hearing1 , 2006 .

[20]  Iain Pardoe,et al.  Sentencing Convicted Felons in the United States: A Bayesian Analysis Using Multilevel Covariates , 2006 .

[21]  J. DeCoster Applied Linear Regression Notes set 1 , 2006 .

[22]  V. Quinsey,et al.  The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. , 2005, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[23]  R. Dodhia A Review of Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.) , 2005 .

[24]  E. Greene,et al.  THE PREJUDICIAL NATURE OF VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENTS Implications for Capital Sentencing Policy , 2004 .

[25]  B. Bornstein The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors’ liability verdicts , 2004 .

[26]  Joel D. Lieberman,et al.  The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases. , 2004, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[27]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Bryan Myers,et al.  Who Is the Victim Anyway? The Effects of Bystander Victim Impact Statements on Mock Juror Sentencing Decisions , 2004, Violence and Victims.

[29]  L. Forsterlee,et al.  The effects of a victim impact statement and gender on juror information processing in a criminal trial: Does the punishment fit the crime? , 2004 .

[30]  L. Horowitz,et al.  How the Need for Cognition Scale Predicts Behavior in Mock Jury Deliberations , 2004, Law and human behavior.

[31]  N. Rayburn,et al.  Bystanders' Perceptions of Perpetrators and Victims of Hate Crime , 2003, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[32]  S. Lynn,et al.  Victim Impact Testimony and Juror Judgments: The Effects of Harm Information and Witness Demeanor1 , 2002 .

[33]  G. Maio,et al.  The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[34]  Chris Guthrie,et al.  Inside the Judicial Mind , 2001 .

[35]  J. Arbuthnot,et al.  The Effects of Victim Impact Evidence on the Verdicts and Sentencing Judgments of Mock Jurors , 1999 .

[36]  E. Greene The many guises of victim impact evidence and effects on jurors' Judgments , 1999 .

[37]  D. Thomson,et al.  Should victim impact influence sentences? Understanding the community's justice reasoning. , 1999, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[38]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Cognitive-experiential self-theory. , 1998 .

[39]  E. Greene,et al.  Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Cases: Does the Victim's Character Matter? , 1998 .

[40]  Barbara E. Johnson,et al.  Rape Myth Acceptance and Sociodemographic Characteristics: A Multidimensional Analysis , 1997 .

[41]  J. Luginbuhl,et al.  Victim impact evidence in a capital trial: Encouraging votes for death , 1995 .

[42]  S Epstein,et al.  Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: further evidence for two conceptual systems. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  R. MacCoun Experimental Research on Jury Decision-Making , 1989, Science.

[44]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Processes of Social Influence: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1985 .

[45]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[46]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[47]  R. McFatter Sentencing strategies and justice: Effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions. , 1978 .

[48]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .