The Role of Emotion and Cognition in Juror Perceptions of Victim Impact Statements
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Cramer,et al. Juror perceptions of African American- and Arabic-named victims , 2013 .
[2] S. I. Kramer. Principles and Practice of Trial Consultation , 2013 .
[3] A. Pemberton,et al. Heterogeneity in victim participation: A new perspective on delivering a Victim Impact Statement , 2013 .
[4] S. Brodsky,et al. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions. , 2012, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
[5] Dario N. Rodriguez,et al. The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario , 2011 .
[6] Meiring de Villiers. The Impartiality Doctrine: Constitutional Meaning and Judicial Impact , 2011 .
[7] D. Mancini. The CSI Effect Reconsidered: Is It Moderated by Need for Cognition? , 2011 .
[8] R. Paternoster,et al. A HEAVY THUMB ON THE SCALE: THE EFFECT OF VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE ON CAPITAL DECISION MAKING* , 2011 .
[9] M. Bourgeois,et al. Anger as a cue to truthfulness , 2010 .
[10] P. Cassell. In Defense of Victim Impact Statements , 2009 .
[11] C. Haney,et al. Capital Jury Deliberation: Effects on Death Sentencing, Comprehension, and Discrimination , 2009, Law and human behavior.
[12] B. Bottoms,et al. Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law. , 2009, Behavioral sciences & the law.
[13] J. Lieberman,et al. The effects of labelling, expert testimony, and information processing mode on juror decisions in SVP civil commitment trials , 2009 .
[14] B. Bornstein,et al. Emotion and the Law: A Field Whose Time Has Come , 2009 .
[15] Charles Doyle. Crime Victims' Rights Act , 2008 .
[16] B. McAuliff,et al. Juror need for cognition and sensitivity to methodological flaws in expert evidence , 2008 .
[17] Joel D. Lieberman,et al. Determining dangerousness in sexually violent predator evaluations: cognitive-experiential self-theory and juror judgments of expert testimony. , 2007, Behavioral sciences & the law.
[18] S. Brodsky,et al. The Influence of Victim Impact Statements on Sentencing in Capital Cases , 2007 .
[19] S. Szmania,et al. Addressing the Court, the Offender, and the Community: A Communication Analysis of Victim Impact Statements in a Non-Capital Sentencing Hearing1 , 2006 .
[20] Iain Pardoe,et al. Sentencing Convicted Felons in the United States: A Bayesian Analysis Using Multilevel Covariates , 2006 .
[21] J. DeCoster. Applied Linear Regression Notes set 1 , 2006 .
[22] V. Quinsey,et al. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. , 2005, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.
[23] R. Dodhia. A Review of Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.) , 2005 .
[24] E. Greene,et al. THE PREJUDICIAL NATURE OF VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENTS Implications for Capital Sentencing Policy , 2004 .
[25] B. Bornstein. The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors’ liability verdicts , 2004 .
[26] Joel D. Lieberman,et al. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases. , 2004, Behavioral sciences & the law.
[27] M. R. Leippe,et al. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.
[28] Bryan Myers,et al. Who Is the Victim Anyway? The Effects of Bystander Victim Impact Statements on Mock Juror Sentencing Decisions , 2004, Violence and Victims.
[29] L. Forsterlee,et al. The effects of a victim impact statement and gender on juror information processing in a criminal trial: Does the punishment fit the crime? , 2004 .
[30] L. Horowitz,et al. How the Need for Cognition Scale Predicts Behavior in Mock Jury Deliberations , 2004, Law and human behavior.
[31] N. Rayburn,et al. Bystanders' Perceptions of Perpetrators and Victims of Hate Crime , 2003, Journal of interpersonal violence.
[32] S. Lynn,et al. Victim Impact Testimony and Juror Judgments: The Effects of Harm Information and Witness Demeanor1 , 2002 .
[33] G. Maio,et al. The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. , 2001, Journal of personality.
[34] Chris Guthrie,et al. Inside the Judicial Mind , 2001 .
[35] J. Arbuthnot,et al. The Effects of Victim Impact Evidence on the Verdicts and Sentencing Judgments of Mock Jurors , 1999 .
[36] E. Greene. The many guises of victim impact evidence and effects on jurors' Judgments , 1999 .
[37] D. Thomson,et al. Should victim impact influence sentences? Understanding the community's justice reasoning. , 1999, Behavioral sciences & the law.
[38] Seymour Epstein,et al. Cognitive-experiential self-theory. , 1998 .
[39] E. Greene,et al. Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Cases: Does the Victim's Character Matter? , 1998 .
[40] Barbara E. Johnson,et al. Rape Myth Acceptance and Sociodemographic Characteristics: A Multidimensional Analysis , 1997 .
[41] J. Luginbuhl,et al. Victim impact evidence in a capital trial: Encouraging votes for death , 1995 .
[42] S Epstein,et al. Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: further evidence for two conceptual systems. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[43] R. MacCoun. Experimental Research on Jury Decision-Making , 1989, Science.
[44] John T. Cacioppo,et al. Processes of Social Influence: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1985 .
[45] C. F. Kao,et al. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.
[46] J. Cacioppo,et al. The need for cognition. , 1982 .
[47] R. McFatter. Sentencing strategies and justice: Effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions. , 1978 .
[48] Jacob Cohen,et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .