Features, Functions and Components of a Library Classification System in the LIS tradition for the e-Environment

This paper describes qualities of a library classification system that are commonly discussed in the LIS tradition and literature, and explains such a system’s three main functions, namely knowledge mapping, information retrieval, and shelf arrangement. In this vein, the paper states the functional requirements of bibliographic classifications, which broadly are subject collocation and facilitation of browsing the collection. It explains with details the components of a library classification system and their functions. The major components are schedules, notations, and index. It also states their distinguished features, such as generalia class, form divisions, book numbers, and devices for number synthesis which are not required in a knowledge classification. It illustrates with examples from the WebDewey good examples of added features of an online library classification system. It emphasizes that institu tional backup and a revision machinery are essential for a classification to survive and remain relevant in the print and e-environment.

[1]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan.  Choice of Scheme for Classification , 1968 .

[2]  Derek Austin,et al.  Itself an education : six lectures on classification , 1962 .

[3]  Arlene G. Taylor,et al.  The Organization of Information , 1999 .

[4]  B. C. Vickery,et al.  Faceted classification schemes , 1966 .

[5]  Phil Mullen.  Organizing Knowledge: An Introduction to Managing Access to Information (3rd ed.) , 2008 .

[6]  Mohinder Partap Satija.  Library classification : An essay in terminology , 2000 .

[7]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan.  SELF‐PERPETUATING SCHEME OF CLASSIFICATION , 1949 .

[8]  Rajendra Kumbhar.  Library Classification Trends in the 21st Century , 2011 .

[9]  Anthony G. Curwen,et al.  Revision of classification schemes: policies and practices , 1978 .

[10]  Brian Buchanan,et al.  Theory of Library Classification , 1980 .

[11]  B. Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Cataloguing and classification for object libraries , 1992, SOEN.

[12]  Keith V. Trickey.  Classification Made Simple (3rd ed.) , 2010 .

[13]  A. J. Wells,et al.  The Fundamentals of Library Classification , 2021 .

[14]  M. P. Satija,et al.  Use of classification in organizing and searching the web , 2014 .

[15]  Aida Slavic,et al.  A Dictionary of Knowledge Organization , 2005, J. Documentation.

[16]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan,et al.  Prolegomena to Library Classification , 1967 .

[17]  Marko Becker.  A Modern Outline Of Library Classification , 2016 .

[18]  Melvil Dewey,et al.  Manual on the use of the Dewey decimal classification, edition 19 , 1982 .

[19]  Aida Slavic,et al.  Faceted Classification: Management and Use , 2008, ArXiv.

[20]  Victoria L. Rubin,et al.  Stretching Conceptual Structures in Classifications Across Languages and Cultures , 2003 .

[21]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Is Facet Analysis Based on Rationalism? A Discussion of Satija (1992), Tennis (2008), Herre (2013), Mazzocchi (2013b), and Dousa & Ibekwe-SanJuan (2014) , 2014 .

[22]  Krishan Kumar,et al.  Theory of Classification , 1983 .

[23]  Jean M. Henscheid,et al.  The Fundamentals , 2013 .

[24]  Vanda Broughton,et al.  The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval , 2006, Aslib Proc..

[25]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[26]  Eric J. Hunter.  Classification Made Simple , 1988 .