One Mouse per Child: interpersonal computer for individual arithmetic practice

Single Display Groupware (SDG) allows multiple people in the same physical space to interact simultaneously over a single communal display through individual input devices that work on the same machine. The aim of this paper is to show how SDG can be used to improve the way resources are used in schools, allowing students to work simultaneously on individual problems at a shared display, and achieve personalized learning with individual feedback within different cultural contexts. We used computational fluency to apply our concept of ‘One Mouse per Child’. It consists of a participatory approach that makes use of personal feedback on an interpersonal computer for the whole classroom. This allows for N simultaneous intelligent tutoring systems, where each child advances at his or her own pace, both within a lecture and throughout the curricular units. Each student must solve a series of mathematical exercises, generated according to his or her performance through a set of pedagogical rules incorporated into the system. In this process, the teacher has an active mediating role, intervening when students require attention. Two exploratory studies were performed. The first study was a multicultural experience between two such distanced socio-economic realities as Chile and India. It showed us that even in different environmental conditions, it is possible to implement this technology with minimal equipment (i.e. a computer, a projector, and one mouse per child). The second study was carried out in a third grade class in a low-income school in Santiago de Chile. The students were asked to solve mainly addition exercises. We established statistically relevant results and observed that the software proved most beneficial for the students with the lowest initial results. This happens because the system adapts to the students' needs, reinforcing the content they most need to work on, thus generating a personalized learning process. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Allison Druin,et al.  Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration , 1999, CHI '99.

[2]  Edward Cutrell,et al.  Quantitative analysis of scrolling techniques , 2002, CHI.

[3]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Paula M. Ahles,et al.  Explaining Helping Behavior in a Cooperative Learning Classroom Setting Using Attribution Theory , 2006 .

[5]  J. Boaler,et al.  Creating Mathematical Futures through an Equitable Teaching Approach: The Case of Railside School , 2008, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Daniel Jackson,et al.  Enhancing Privacy in Public Spaces Through Crossmodal Displays , 2008 .

[7]  Arturo Olivarez,et al.  Efficacy and Pedagogical Interaction in Cooperating and Student Teacher Dyads. , 2007 .

[8]  Cher Ping Lim Global citizenship education, school curriculum and games: Learning Mathematics, English and Science as a global citizen , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[9]  James L. Cooper Cooperative/Collaborative Learning: Research and Practice (Primarily) at the Collegiate Level, Parts I and II. , 1991 .

[10]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Interpersonal Computers for Higher Education , 2009 .

[11]  Mary Hill,et al.  Making Classroom Assessment Work , 2000 .

[12]  Daniel B. Berch,et al.  Making Sense of Number Sense , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  G. Stobart The validity of formative assessment , 2011 .

[14]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Multiple Mice based collaborative one-to-one learning , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  DISHA: Disease and health awareness for children on multiple input devices , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD).

[16]  Kentaro Toyama,et al.  Toward universal mobile interaction for shared displays , 2004, CSCW.

[17]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  A mischief of mice: examining children's performance in single display groupware systems with 1 to 32 mice , 2009, CHI.

[18]  Yu-Hui Ching,et al.  Mobile computer-supported collaborative learning: A review of experimental research , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Multiple mouse text entry for single-display groupware , 2010, CSCW '10.

[20]  Matthew Kam,et al.  Reducing dominance in multiple-mouse learning activities , 2009, CSCL.

[21]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  Mischief: supporting remote teaching in developing regions , 2008, CHI.

[22]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools , 2007, CHI.

[23]  Theodore Panitz,et al.  The Case for Student Centered Instruction via Collaborative Learning Paradigms. , 1999 .

[24]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  The case for multi-user design for computer aided learning in developing regions , 2006, WWW '06.

[25]  Chris Dede,et al.  Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning , 2009, Science.

[26]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[27]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Co-located Collaborative Learning Video Game with Single Display Groupware Co-located Collaborative Learning Video Game with Single Display Groupware , 2022 .