Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice

Biodiversity offsets are an increasingly popular yet controversial tool in conservation. Their popularity lies in their potential to meet the objectives of biodiversity conservation and of economic development in tandem; the controversy lies in the need to accept ecological losses in return for uncertain gains. The offsetting approach is being widely adopted, even though its methodologies and the overriding conceptual framework are still under development. This review of biodiversity offsetting evaluates implementation to date and synthesizes outstanding theoretical and practical problems. We begin by outlining the criteria that make biodiversity offsets unique and then explore the suite of conceptual challenges arising from these criteria and indicate potential design solutions. We find that biodiversity offset schemes have been inconsistent in meeting conservation objectives because of the challenge of ensuring full compliance and effective monitoring and because of conceptual flaws in the approach itself. Evidence to support this conclusion comes primarily from developed countries, although offsets are increasingly being implemented in the developing world. We are at a critical stage: biodiversity offsets risk becoming responses to immediate development and conservation needs without an overriding conceptual framework to provide guidance and evaluation criteria. We clarify the meaning of the term biodiversity offset and propose a framework that integrates the consideration of theoretical and practical challenges in the offset process. We also propose a research agenda for specific topics around metrics, baselines and uncertainty.

[1]  J. Kiesecker,et al.  Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks , 2010, Environmental management.

[2]  William J. Mitsch,et al.  Improving the Success of Wetland Creation and Restoration with Know‐How, Time, and Self‐Design , 1996 .

[3]  C. Lant,et al.  The Effect of Wetland Mitigation Banking on the Achievement of No-Net-Loss , 1999, Environmental management.

[4]  Alan Hanson,et al.  Wetland mitigation and compensation: Canadian experience , 2009, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[5]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Kerry ten Kate,et al.  Biodiversity offsets : views, experience, and the business case , 2004 .

[7]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments , 2006, PLoS biology.

[8]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Treatment of uncertainty in conservation under climate change , 2013 .

[9]  Roger K. A. Morris,et al.  The creation of compensatory habitat—Can it secure sustainable development? , 2006 .

[10]  Kelly A. Carscadden,et al.  Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services , 2011 .

[11]  R. Bayón,et al.  Conservation and Biodiversity Banking: A Guide to Setting Up and Running Biodiversity Credit Trading Systems , 2012 .

[12]  Shelley Burgin,et al.  BioBanking: an environmental scientist’s view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservation , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[13]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Methods for allocation of habitat management, maintenance, restoration and offsetting, when conservation actions have uncertain consequences , 2012 .

[14]  L. Wallis Crossing the divide. , 1998, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[15]  M. Power,et al.  Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems , 2012, PLoS biology.

[16]  J. J. Price,et al.  Crossing the divide , 2006 .

[17]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  A TAXONOMY AND TREATMENT OF UNCERTAINTY FOR ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY , 2002 .

[18]  Amy Pocewicz,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Development by design : blending landscape-level planning with the mitigation hierarchy , 2009 .

[19]  P. Hay,et al.  A Question Of Balance In Integrated Impact Assessment: Negotiating Away The Environmental Interest In Australia'S Basslink Project , 2007 .

[20]  R. Ambrose Wetlands mitigation in the United States: assessing the success of mitigation policies , 2010 .

[21]  A. Purvis,et al.  Getting the measure of biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[22]  Jason T Quigley,et al.  Effectiveness of Fish Habitat Compensation in Canada in Achieving No Net Loss , 2006, Environmental management.

[23]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Offsets for land clearing: No net loss or the tail wagging the dog? , 2007 .

[24]  Margaret S. Race,et al.  Fixing Compensatory Mitigation: What Will it Take? , 1996 .

[25]  Frank Lupi,et al.  Relating tradable credits for biodiversity to sustainability criteria in a dynamic landscape , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies , 2012 .

[27]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Measuring biodiversity value for conservation : Sustainability issues , 1995 .

[28]  L. Krämer The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive , 2008 .

[29]  Fabien Quétier,et al.  Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: Key issues and solutions , 2011 .

[30]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Conserving biodiversity with tradable permits under changing conservation costs and habitat restoration time lags , 2011 .

[31]  W. Niering,et al.  Comparison of created and natural freshwater emergent wetlands in Connecticut (USA) , 1992, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[32]  D J Harper,et al.  No Net Loss of Fish Habitat: A Review and Analysis of Habitat Compensation in Canada , 2005, Environmental management.

[33]  Navinder J. Singh,et al.  Conservation when nothing stands still: moving targets and biodiversity offsets , 2013 .

[34]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[35]  A. Watts,et al.  The Myths of Restoration Ecology , 2005 .

[36]  Ascelin Gordon,et al.  Assessing the impacts of biodiversity offset policies , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[37]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  The habitat hectares approach to vegetation assessment: An evaluation and suggestions for improvement , 2004 .

[38]  David A Norton,et al.  Biodiversity Offsets: Two New Zealand Case Studies and an Assessment Framework , 2009, Environmental management.

[39]  S. Hirakuri Can Law Save the Forest?: Lessons from Finland and Brazil , 2003 .

[40]  Amy Pocewicz,et al.  A Framework for Implementing Biodiversity Offsets: Selecting Sites and Determining Scale , 2009 .

[41]  Yakov Ben-Haim,et al.  How Much Compensation is Enough? A Framework for Incorporating Uncertainty and Time Discounting When Calculating Offset Ratios for Impacted Habitat , 2009 .

[42]  A. G. Endress,et al.  Performance Criteria, Compliance Success, and Vegetation Development in Compensatory Mitigation Wetlands , 2008, Environmental management.

[43]  William G. Lee,et al.  Why bartering biodiversity fails , 2009 .

[44]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments , 2004 .

[45]  D. Godden,et al.  Theoretical Issues in Using Offsets for Managing Biodiversity , 2003 .

[46]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank , 2010 .

[47]  Lucy Bastin,et al.  When do conservation planning methods deliver? Quantifying the consequences of uncertainty , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[48]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  A Conceptual Analysis of the Application of Tradable Permits to Biodiversity Conservation , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[49]  Chris Wilcox,et al.  Compensatory mitigation as a solution to fisheries bycatch–biodiversity conservation conflicts , 2007 .

[50]  J. Lubchenco Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science , 1998 .

[51]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Applying tradable permits to biodiversity conservation: effects of space-dependent conservation benefits and cost heterogeneity on habitat allocation. , 2009 .

[52]  Frank Lupi,et al.  Landscape Equivalency Analysis: Methodology for Estimating Spatially Explicit Biodiversity Credits , 2005, Environmental management.

[53]  Jason T Quigley,et al.  Compliance with Canada’s Fisheries Act: A Field Audit of Habitat Compensation Projects , 2006, Environmental management.

[54]  James E. Salzman,et al.  Currencies and the Commodification of Environmental Law , 2000 .

[55]  J. Fox,et al.  Status of Species Conservation Banking in the United States , 2005 .

[56]  David A. Keith,et al.  Observer variation in field assessments of vegetation condition: Implications for biodiversity conservation , 2009 .