Induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy are the most two effective treatments for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study was to compare the efficacy of induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. METHODS From August 2002 to April 2005, 408 patients were randomly divided into the induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC/CCRT) group and the induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy (IC/RT) group. Patients in both groups received the same induction chemotherapy, including two cycles of floxuridine (FuDR) plus carboplatin (FuDR750 mg/m2, d1-5; carboplatin AUC=6). All the patients underwent radiotherapy one week after completing the induction chemotherapy. The patients in the IC/CCRT group also received carboplatin (AUC=6) on day 7, 28, and 49 during radiotherapy. Eight patients did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded. The remaining 400 cases were analyzed. RESULTS Grade III/IV toxicity was found in 28.4% of the patients in the IC/CCRT group and 13.1% in the IC/RT group (P < 0.001). After a median follow up time of 3.9 years, the three-year overall survival was 75.9% and 83.4% (P = 0.12) in the IC/CCRT and IC/RT groups, respectively. No significant differences in the failure-free survival rate, the locoregional control rate, and the distant control rate were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION The IC/CCRT program does not improve the overall survival rate in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC compared with the IC/RT program.