Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus

BackgroundThis paper reports the process and outcome of a consensus finding project, which began with a meeting at the Brocher Foundation in May 2015. The project sought to generate and reach consensus on standards of practice for Empirical Bioethics research. The project involved 16 academics from 5 different European Countries, with a range of disciplinary backgrounds.MethodsThe consensus process used a modified Delphi approach.ResultsConsensus was reached on 15 standards of practice, organised into 6 domains of research practice (Aims, Questions, Integration, Conduct of Empirical Work, Conduct of Normative Work; Training & Expertise).ConclusionsThrough articulating these standards we outline a position that encourages responses, and through those responses we will be able to identify points of agreement and contestation that will drive the conversation forward. In that vein, we would encourage researchers, funders and journals to engage with what we have proposed, and respond to us, so that our community of practice of empirical bioethics research can develop and evolve further.

[1]  Martine C. de Vries,et al.  Reflective Equilibrium and Empirical Data: Third Person Moral Experiences in Empirical Medical Ethics , 2009 .

[2]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus , 2007 .

[3]  S. Salloch,et al.  Research across the disciplines: a road map for quality criteria in empirical ethics research , 2014, BMC medical ethics.

[4]  Robin Williams,et al.  Sociology, ethics, and the priority of the particular: learning from a case study of genetic deliberations. , 2007, The British journal of sociology.

[5]  S. Reiter-Theil Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? “The embedded researcher” as a methodological approach , 2004, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[6]  Symbiotic Empirical Ethics: A Practical Methodology , 2012, Bioethics.

[7]  M. Parker,et al.  Toward Methodological Innovation in Empirical Ethics Research , 2012, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[8]  M. Dixon-Woods,et al.  The problem of appraising qualitative research. , 2004 .

[9]  J. Ives A Method of Reflexive Balancing in a Pragmatic, Interdisciplinary and Reflexive Bioethics , 2014, Bioethics.

[10]  J. Schildmann,et al.  Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies , 2018, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[11]  J. Ives,et al.  Empirical Bioethics: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives , 2017 .

[12]  R. D. de Vries,et al.  Assessing the Public's Views in Research Ethics Controversies: Deliberative Democracy and Bioethics as Natural Allies , 2009, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[13]  J. A. Smith,et al.  The problem of appraising qualitative research , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[14]  G. Widdershoven,et al.  Don’t Solve the Issues! , 2012, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[15]  G. Widdershoven,et al.  Empirical Ethics as Dialogical Practice , 2009, Bioethics.

[16]  P. Borry,et al.  The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. , 2005, Bioethics.

[17]  P. Alderson,et al.  Examining Ethics in Practice: health service professionals’ evaluations of in-hospital ethics seminars , 2002, Nursing ethics.

[18]  M. Solomon Realizing Bioethics' Goals in Practice: Ten Ways "Is" Can Help "Ought" , 2005, The Hastings Center report.

[19]  Anne M. Stiggelbout,et al.  Scientific Contribution. Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics , 2004, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[20]  Jan Schildmann,et al.  Empirical research in medical ethics: How conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice , 2012, BMC medical ethics.

[21]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[22]  S. Hurst What ‘Empirical Turn in Bioethics’? , 2010, Bioethics.

[23]  H. Draper,et al.  Publishing research in empirical ethics : quality, disciplines and expertise , 2017 .

[24]  J. Ives,et al.  A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies , 2015, BMC Medical Ethics.

[25]  Lucy Dillon,et al.  Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. A quality framework. , 2003 .

[26]  Pascal Borry,et al.  Nobody Tosses a Dwarf! The Relation between the Empirical and the Normative Reexamined , 2009, Bioethics.

[27]  C. Herrera Is it Time for Bioethics to Go Empirical? , 2008, Bioethics.

[28]  J. Ives,et al.  Methodology, Epistemology, and Empirical Bioethics Research: A Constructive/ist Commentary , 2009, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[29]  Johannes J. M. van Delden,et al.  Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative-Empirical Model in Bioethics , 1998 .