Functional and clinical outcomes of telemedicine in patients with spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE To compare the 6-month outcomes of telerehabilitation intervention with those of standard care for spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN Multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING Home, nursing, or unspecialized hospital care provided after discharge from a spinal cord unit. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients with nonprogressive, complete, or incomplete SCI discharged for the first time from the spinal cord unit to their homes (Belgium and Italy) or to their homes or another facility (England). INTERVENTIONS All patients received the standard care they would have normally received after discharge from the spinal cord unit. In addition, patients in the telemedicine group received 8 telemedicine weekly sessions in the first 2 months, followed by biweekly telemedicine sessions for 4 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Functional status at 6 months, clinical complications during the postdischarge period, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS No significant differences in the occurrence of clinical complications were found between the study groups. A higher improvement of functional scores in the telemedicine group was found only at the Italian site: FIM total score 3.38+/-4.43 (controls) versus 7.69+/-6.88 (telemedicine group), FIM motor score 3.24+/-4.38 (controls) versus 7.55+/-7.00 (telemedicine group; P<.05). Items contributing to this difference were grooming, dressing upper body, dressing lower body, and bed/chair/wheelchair transfer. Higher satisfaction with care was reported by patients in the telemedicine group across all sites. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides some of the first quantitative evidence, based on results from 1 site, that telerehabilitation may offer benefits to patients discharged from a spinal cord unit compared with standard care in terms of functional improvement. Further research is warranted to confirm or disprove this finding.

[1]  William D. Dupont,et al.  Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. , 1990, Controlled clinical trials.

[2]  J J Eng,et al.  A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[3]  T. L. Williams,et al.  Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Cross-cultural validity of FIM in spinal cord injury , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[5]  Rita Kobb,et al.  Enhancing elder chronic care through technology and care coordination: report from a pilot. , 2003, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  The contribution of telemedicine to cardiology , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  W. Hersh,et al.  Telemedicine for the medicare population: update. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[8]  H. Pain,et al.  Using telemedicine to provide post-discharge support for patients with spinal cord injuries , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  D. Hailey,et al.  Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  S Vesmarovich,et al.  Use of telerehabilitation to manage pressure ulcers in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 1999, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[11]  Chester H Ho,et al.  Spinal cord injury medicine. 6. Economic and societal issues in spinal cord injury. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Michelle E. Cohen,et al.  Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  C. Urquhart,et al.  Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. , 2000, Nursing times.

[14]  J. Wyndaele,et al.  Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[15]  Helen C Noel,et al.  Home telehealth reduces healthcare costs. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[16]  A. Catz,et al.  SCIM – spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[17]  G. Scivoletto,et al.  A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[18]  Steven Kirshblum,et al.  Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  James J. Cimino,et al.  Research Paper: A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: 5 Year Results of the IDEATel Study , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  James Wallace,et al.  Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review , 2001, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[21]  Justin Starren,et al.  Research Paper: A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  Benjamin Powers,et al.  Hypertension Intervention Nurse Telemedicine Study (HINTS): testing a multifactorial tailored behavioral/educational and a medication management intervention for blood pressure control. , 2007, American heart journal.

[23]  A. Catz,et al.  Rasch analysis of the Catz-Itzkovich spinal cord independence measure , 2002, Spinal Cord.

[24]  D. K. Williams,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Telemedicine-based Collaborative Care for Depression , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[25]  J S Kreutzer,et al.  Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Duration and functional outcome of spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the Netherlands. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[27]  V. Phillips,et al.  Telehealth: Reaching Out to Newly Injured Spinal Cord Patients , 2001, Public health reports.

[28]  G. Savić,et al.  Utilization, access and satisfaction with primary care among people with spinal cord injuries: a comparison of three countries , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[29]  R. Beyth,et al.  The effectiveness of a care coordination home telehealth program for veterans with diabetes mellitus: a 2-year follow-up. , 2006, The American journal of managed care.

[30]  Marinella Galea,et al.  Telerehabilitation in spinal cord injury persons: a novel approach. , 2006, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.