Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies

Picture naming speed is strongly influenced by the age of acquisition (AoA) of words. Most studies of AoA have relied on adults' AoA ratings. However, objective AoA has been found to be a stronger determinant of picture naming latencies. Whereas objective AoA norms for words have been collected for some language communities, no objective AoA measures for words were previously available in French. The study provides objective AoA norms for a set of 230 object names following the procedures used by Morrison, Chappell, and Ellis (1997) to collect objective AoA measures in English. The relationships between objective AoA measures, rated AoA, other variables used in psycholinguistic experiments (name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, etc.), the English data collected by Morrison et al., and naming latencies are analysed and discussed. In addition, reanalyses of data on picture naming latencies (Bonin, Chalard, Méot, & Fayol, 2002) with the use of objective AoA norms are provided. Stepwise multiple analyses show that objective AoA is a stronger determinant of (spoken and written) naming latencies than rated AoA, whereas objective word frequency is not a reliable independent determinant and does not interact reliably with AoA in any of the analyses.

[1]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks , 1979 .

[2]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[3]  M. Fayol,et al.  Age of Acquisition and Word Frequency in Written Picture Naming , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  The validity of age-of-acquisition ratings , 1980 .

[5]  Anthony F Jorm,et al.  The validity of word age-of-acquisition ratings : a longitudinal study of a child's word knowledge , 1991 .

[6]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Age-of-acquisition and word frequency in the lexical decision task: Further evidence from the french language , 2001 .

[8]  F. Cirrin,et al.  Lexical Search Speed in Children and Adults. , 1984 .

[9]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading , 1988 .

[10]  M. W. Bergman,et al.  Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks ☆ , 1985 .

[11]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  A validation study of the age-of-acquisition norms collected by Ghyselinck, De Moor, & Brysbaert , 2000 .

[12]  M. Vitkovitch,et al.  Sources of Disagreement in Object Naming , 1995 .

[13]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[14]  P. Mousty,et al.  Brulex: une base de donne 'es lexicales informatise 'e pour le franc?ais e 'crit et parle , 1990 .

[15]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[16]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Joan Gay Snodgrass,et al.  Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 1996 .

[18]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Two age of acquisition effects in the reading of Japanese Kanji , 1997 .

[19]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[20]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Imagery, concreteness, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, and meaningfulness values for 205 five-letter words having single-solution anagrams , 1977 .

[21]  J. Pind,et al.  Icelandic norms for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) pictures: name and image agreement, familiarity, and age of acquisition. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[22]  Angel Fernandez,et al.  A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity , 1996 .

[23]  A W Ellis,et al.  Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[24]  David C. Rubin,et al.  51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of verbal behavior , 1980 .

[25]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Picture naming: identical priming and word frequency interact , 1999 .

[26]  J. Grainger Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. , 1990 .

[27]  J. Metsala,et al.  Young children’s age-of-acquisition estimates for spoken words , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[28]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[29]  J. Yamada,et al.  Effect of Ease-of-Acquisition on Naming Latency for Japanese Kanji: A Reanalysis of Yamazaki, et al.'s (1997) Data , 1998, Psychological reports.

[30]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[31]  A. Paivio,et al.  Referential processing: Reciprocity and correlates of naming and imaging , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[32]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[33]  F X Alario,et al.  A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[34]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Word age-of-acquisition, reading latencies and auditory recognition , 1981 .

[35]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Age of Acquisition, Word Frequency, and the Locus of Repetition Priming of Picture Naming , 2001 .

[36]  Arthur W. Lyons,et al.  Age-at-acquisition and word recognition , 1978 .

[37]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  D. Howard,et al.  Aphasic naming: What matters? , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Age-of-acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming , 1999, Cognition.

[40]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[41]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis , 2002 .

[42]  J. Carroll,et al.  Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns , 1973 .

[43]  Boris New,et al.  Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .

[44]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2816 Dutch four- and five-letter nouns , 2000 .

[46]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. , 1998 .

[47]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[49]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[50]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language , 2000 .

[51]  M. Brysbaert Word frequency affects naming latency in Dutch when age of acquisition is controlled. , 1996 .

[52]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[53]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[54]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. , 2000 .

[55]  Roy Lachman,et al.  Language and Cognition: Effects of Stimulus Codability, Name-Word Frequency, and Age of Acquisition on Lexical Reaction Time. , 1974 .

[56]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[57]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[58]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[59]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[60]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  ROLES OF WORD FREQUENCY AND AGE OF ACQUISITION IN WORD NAMING AND LEXICAL DECISION , 1995 .

[61]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[62]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000 .

[63]  R. Lachman Uncertainty effects on time to access the internal lexicon. , 1973 .

[64]  R. C. Oldfield,et al.  The Time it Takes to Name an Object , 1964, Nature.

[65]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. , 2000, British journal of psychology.