Epenthesis positioning and syllable contact in Chaha

If an epenthetic vowel is required for syllable structure reasons, its position in a string may be determined by ‘directionality’, with the construction of maximal syllables beginning from a word edge (Itô 1986, 1989, Farwaneh 1995). Arabic has served as the prime example of directionality, but other Semitic languages have also played a role, such as Harari (Kenstowicz & Kisseberth 1979, Itô 1986) and Tigrinya (Denais 1990, Berhane 1991). In these languages the sonority of heterosyllabic (coda–onset) consonant sequences neither conditions insertion nor affects the site of the epenthetic vowel. Epenthesis is triggered by constraints on maximal syllable size, and the position of the epenthetic vowel is determined by directionality. As a result, violations of SYLLABLE CONTACT abound. Syllable contact can be defined as the requirement that a coda be more sonorous than a following onset (Murray & Vennemann 1983, Vennemann 1988). In this article, I provide new data from Chaha, an Ethiopian Semitic language of the Gurage family, which demonstrate an intriguing difference from Semitic languages such as Harari, Tigrinya and Arabic.

[1]  M. Kenstowicz.  Base-Identity and Uniform Exponence: Alternatives to Cyclicity , 1995 .

[2]  Draga Zec.  Sonority constraints on syllable structure , 1995, Phonology.

[3]  Vicki Carstens,et al.  Advances in African Linguistics , 2000 .

[4]  Jean Lowenstamm,et al.  Constituent structure and government in phonology , 1990, Phonology.

[5]  E. Broselow.  Parametric variation in Arabic dialect phonology , 1992 .

[6]  Sharon Rose.  Rethinking Geminates, Long-Distance Geminates, and the OCP , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[7]  Theo Vennemann,et al.  Sound Change and Syllable Structure in Germanic Phonology , 1983 .

[8]  Outi Bat-El.  Selecting the best of the worst: the grammar of Hebrew blends , 1996, Phonology.

[9]  Junko Ito,et al.  A prosodic theory of epenthesis , 1989 .

[10]  伊藤 順子.  Syllable theory in prosodic phonology , 1986 .

[11]  K. Crosswhite,et al.  Segmental vs. prosodic correspondence in Chamorro , 1998, Phonology.

[12]  Suzanne Urbanczyk,et al.  Patterns of Reduplication in Lushootseed , 2001 .

[13]  B. Laks,et al.  Current Trends in Phonology : Models and Methods , 1996 .

[14]  John Harris,et al.  Segmental complexity and phonological government , 1990, Phonology.

[15]  John J. Ohala,et al.  Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints , 1997 .

[16]  Stuart Davis,et al.  The Syllable Contact Constraint in Korean: An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis , 1999 .

[17]  P. Lacy,et al.  Papers in optimality theory , 1995 .

[18]  Laura Benua.  Identity Effects in Morphological Truncation , 1995 .

[19]  Chris Golston,et al.  DIRECT OPTIMALITY THEORY : REPRESENTATION AS PURE MARKEDNESS , 1996 .

[20]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Generative Phonology: Description and Theory , 1979 .

[21]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Paradigm Uniformity and the Phonetics-Phonology Boundary , 1996 .

[22]  Keren Rice,et al.  On deriving sonority: a structural account of sonority relationships , 1992, Phonology.

[23]  E. Broselow.  Syllable Structure in Two Arabic Dialects in Studies in Arabic Linguistics. , 1980 .

[24]  Bushra Adnan Zawaydeh,et al.  On an Optimality-Theoretic Account of Epenthesis and Syncope in Arabic Dialects , 1997 .

[25]  Degif Petros Banksira.  Sound Mutations: The morphophonology of Chaha , 2000 .

[26]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology , 1994 .

[27]  J. Greenberg.  The Patterning of Root Morphemes in Semitic , 1950 .

[28]  Stuart Davis.  Syllable Contact in Optimality Theory , 1998 .

[29]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology , 1990 .

[30]  Sharon Rose.  Theoretical issues in comparative Ethio-Semitic phonology and morphology , 2000 .

[31]  J. McCarthy.  OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination , 1986 .

[32]  Wolf Leslau.  The Jussive in Chaha , 1964 .

[33]  J. Angoujard.  Metrical Structure of Arabic , 1990 .

[34]  J. Hooper.  An introduction to natural generative phonology , 1976 .

[35]  A. Green.  The prosodic structure of Irish, Scots Gaelic, and Manx , 1997 .

[36]  Alan S. Kaye,et al.  Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XII , 1998 .

[37]  Alan Prince,et al.  Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural , 1990 .

[38]  Directional Syllabification in Generalized Alignment , 1994 .

[39]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Faithfulness and reduplicative identity , 1995 .

[40]  E. Battistella,et al.  Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change , 1988 .

[41]  Hagit Borer,et al.  Theoretical issues in the grammar of Semitic languages , 1981 .

[42]  G. Clements.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification , 1990 .