The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure

Starting from the premise that vulnerability curves are an indispensable ingredient of earthquake loss assessment, this paper focuses on establishing the relative effect of strong-motion variability and random structural parameters on the ensuing vulnerability curves. Moreover, the effect of the selection of statistical models used to present simulation results is studied. A three story ordinary moment resisting reinforced concrete frame, previously shake-table tested, is used as a basis for the fragility analysis. The analytical environment and the structural model are verified through comparison with shaking-table test results. The selection of ground motion sets, definition of limit states, statistical manipulation of simulation results, and the effect of material variability are investigated. No approximations are used to reduce the sample size or minimize the analytical effort, in order that attention is focused on the parameters under investigation. Notwithstanding the limited scope of the study, the results presented indicate that the effect of randomness in material response parameters is far less significant than the effect of strong-motion characteristics. Therefore, the importance of scrupulous selection and scaling of strong-motion and use of appropriate limit states and statistical models is emphasized.

[1]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .

[2]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Modelling of material non‐linearities in steel structures subjected to transient dynamic loading , 1993 .

[3]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Seismic resistance of composite beam-columns in multi-storey structures. Part 2: Analytical model and discussion of results , 1994 .

[4]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Effect of peak ground acceleration to velocity ratio on ductility demand of inelastic systems , 1988 .

[5]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Inelastic spectra for displacement based seismic design , 2001 .

[6]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT OF AN IRREGULAR RC FRAME FOR FULL-SCALE 3D PSEUDO-DYNAMIC TESTING PART I: ANALYTICAL MODEL VERIFICATION , 2005 .

[7]  A. S. Elnashai,et al.  Confined concrete model under cyclic load , 1997 .

[8]  Amr S. Elnashai DO WE REALLY NEED INELASTIC DYNAMIC ANALYSIS? , 2002 .

[9]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT OF AN IRREGULAR RC FRAME FOR FULL-SCALE 3D PSEUDO-DYNAMIC TESTING PART II: CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND TEST DEPLOYMENT , 2005 .

[10]  Giampiero Orsini A Model for Buildings' Vulnerability Assessment Using the Parameterless Scale of Seismic Intensity (PSI) , 1999 .

[11]  D. H. Lee,et al.  Zeus NL - A System for Inelastic Analysis of Structures , 2004 .

[12]  J. Bommer,et al.  THE EFFECTIVE DURATION OF EARTHQUAKE STRONG MOTION , 1999 .

[13]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Seismic Fragility of LRC Frames with and without Masonry Infill Walls , 1997 .

[14]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Performance of composite steel/concrete members under earthquake loading. Part I: Analytical model , 1993 .

[15]  J. G. Macgregor,et al.  Variability of Mechanical Properties of Reinforcing Bars , 1985 .

[16]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods for Estimating Seismic Deformation of Inelastic Structures: SDF Systems , 1999 .

[17]  James G. MacGregor,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE IN STRUCTURES , 1996 .

[18]  Marios K. Chryssanthopoulos,et al.  Probabilistic evaluation of behaviour factors in EC8-designed R/C frames , 2000 .

[19]  A. G. Brady,et al.  A STUDY ON THE DURATION OF STRONG EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 1975 .

[20]  Vasileios A. Drosos Synthesis of earthquake ground motions for the new madrid seismic zone , 2003 .