Automatic construction of an anatomical coordinate system for three-dimensional bone models of the lower extremities--pelvis, femur, and tibia.

Automated methods for constructing patient-specific anatomical coordinate systems (ACSs) for the pelvis, femur and tibia were developed based on the bony geometry of each, derived from computed tomography (CT). The methods used principal axes of inertia, principal component analysis (PCA), cross-sectional area, and spherical and ellipsoidal surface fitting to eliminate the influence of rater's bias on reference landmark selection. Automatic ACSs for the pelvis, femur, and tibia were successfully constructed on each 3D bone model using the developed algorithm. All constructions were performed within 30s; furthermore, between- and within- rater errors were zero for a given CT-based 3D bone model, owing to the automated nature of the algorithm. ACSs recommended by the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) were compared with the automatically constructed ACS, to evaluate the potential differences caused by the selection of the coordinate system. The pelvis ACSs constructed using the ISB-recommended system were tilted significantly more anteriorly than those constructed automatically (range, 9.6-18.8°). There were no significant differences between the two methods for the femur. For the tibia, significant differences were found in the direction of the anteroposterior axis; the anteroposterior axes identified by ISB were more external than those in the automatic ACS (range, 17.5-25.0°).

[1]  K Manal,et al.  Knee moment profiles during walking: errors due to soft tissue movement of the shank and the influence of the reference coordinate system. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[2]  Alon Wolf,et al.  Cup Alignment Error Model for Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Yoshiaki Toyama,et al.  A novel and reproducible reference axis for distal tibial axial rotation. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  H. Rubash,et al.  Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  J. Tamura,et al.  In Vivo Three-Dimensional Knee Kinematics Using a Biplanar Image-Matching Technique , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Bone position and orientation errors: pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark identification reliability , 1997 .

[9]  J. S. Rovick,et al.  External knee joint design based on normal motion. , 1985, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  S. B. Mostofi.,et al.  Pelvis and Lower Limb , 2012 .

[11]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Scott Tashman,et al.  In-vivo measurement of dynamic joint motion using high speed biplane radiography and CT: application to canine ACL deficiency. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  Joseph J Crisco,et al.  Automatic determination of anatomical coordinate systems for three-dimensional bone models of the isolated human knee. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  W. Huda,et al.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. , 2008, Radiology.

[15]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  Tibial anatomy and functional axes , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[20]  Jörg Peters,et al.  Computing moments of objects enclosed by piecewise polynomial surfaces , 1998, TOGS.

[21]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  An anatomic coordinate system of the femoral neck for highly reproducible BMD measurements using 3D QCT. , 2005, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.

[22]  Y Hirasawa,et al.  Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  Chiaki Hamanishi,et al.  An Anteroposterior Axis of the Tibia for Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[25]  Burkhard Lembeck,et al.  Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[26]  C. Olcott,et al.  The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  V M Spitzer,et al.  Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Distal Part of the Femur Viewed in Virtual Reality , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  C. Olcott,et al.  Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty , 1999 .

[30]  Y. Koga,et al.  Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  G. Li,et al.  Variability of a three-dimensional finite element model constructed using magnetic resonance images of a knee for joint contact stress analysis. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[32]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark calibration precision and its propagation to bone geometry and joint angles , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.