The benefits of virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic surgery

Purpose of review Virtual reality is a computer-generated system that provides a representation of an environment. This review will analyse the literature with regard to any benefit to be derived from training with virtual reality equipment and to describe the current equipment available. Recent findings Virtual reality systems are not currently realistic of the live operating environment because they lack tactile sensation, and do not represent a complete operation. The literature suggests that virtual reality training is a valuable learning tool for gynaecologists in training, particularly those in the early stages of their careers. Furthermore, it may be of benefit for the ongoing audit of surgical skills and for the early identification of a surgeon's deficiencies before operative incidents occur. It is only a matter of time before realistic virtual reality models of most complete gynaecological operations are available, with improved haptics as a result of improved computer technology. Summary It is inevitable that in the modern climate of litigation virtual reality training will become an essential part of clinical training, as evidence for its effectiveness as a training tool exists, and in many countries training by operating on live animals is not possible. Abbreviation MIST–VR: Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer–Virtual Reality.

[1]  D. Scott,et al.  Construct and face validity of MIST-VR, Endotower, and CELTS , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[2]  Paul G Gauger,et al.  Laparoscopic Skills Are Improved With LapMentor™ Training: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[3]  C. Kum,et al.  Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy , 1993, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  Virtual reality simulation training can improve technical skills during laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  Ronald C Merrell,et al.  Training in laparoscopic suturing skills using a new computer-based virtual reality simulator (MIST-VR) provides results comparable to those with an established pelvic trainer system. , 2002, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[6]  Teodor P Grantcharov,et al.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[7]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[8]  R. Hart,et al.  Is laparoscopic surgery really worth it? The views of patients, hospital doctors and health care managers , 2001 .

[9]  C Sutton,et al.  Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface. , 1999, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[10]  J. Ayerdi,et al.  Training Background as a Factor in the Conversion Rate of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy , 2001, The American surgeon.

[11]  H. Lönroth,et al.  The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[12]  A. Darzi,et al.  Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. , 1998, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[13]  Ian Hammond,et al.  Training, assessment and competency in gynaecologic surgery. , 2006, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[14]  Richard M Satava,et al.  Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  A. Gallagher,et al.  A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skill acquisition. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[16]  R. E Richardson,et al.  Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time? , 1995, The Lancet.

[17]  M. Canis,et al.  The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[18]  A. Duffy,et al.  Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[19]  K. B. Johnson,et al.  Quantifying the Literature of Computer‐aided Instruction in Medical Education , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[20]  J. Donnez,et al.  Results of eVALuate study of hysterectomy techniques: High rate of complications needs explanation , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  R. Hart,et al.  The cost of a hysterectomy in a UK hospital. , 1999, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[22]  M. Ornstein,et al.  Virtual reality and laparoscopic surgery , 1995, The British journal of surgery.

[23]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[24]  S. Mason,et al.  EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[25]  C. Cox,et al.  Laparoscopic surgical management of ectopic pregnancy: a district general hospital experience. , 2000, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[26]  L. Lundell,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[27]  M. Lewis,et al.  Assessment of basic surgical trainees: can we do more? , 2003, Postgraduate medical journal.

[28]  Robert Stone,et al.  Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for assessment in gynaecology , 2003, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[29]  P. Finn,et al.  Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[30]  A. Darzi,et al.  The role of the Basic Surgical Skills course in the acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skill , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[31]  Charles Vincent,et al.  Systems Approaches to Surgical Quality and Safety: From Concept to Measurement , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[32]  A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  R. Clayman,et al.  Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[34]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Simulation for the Operating Room: Proficiency-Based Training as a Paradigm Shift in Surgical Skills Training , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[35]  Daniel B. Jones,et al.  Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[36]  T Grantcharov,et al.  Virtual reality simulation training can improve technical skills during laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[37]  Andrea Manca,et al.  Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[38]  E. Steinberg,et al.  Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  An Evidence-Based Virtual Reality Training Program for Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[40]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Objective Psychomotor Skills Assessment of Experienced, Junior, and Novice Laparoscopists with Virtual Reality , 2001, World Journal of Surgery.

[41]  A Darzi,et al.  Virtual reality and laparoscopic surgery , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[42]  C. Flamigni,et al.  Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[43]  W. Watson.  Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[44]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[45]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Virtual Reality Training in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Assessment of Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer Virtual Reality (MIST VR) , 1999, Endoscopy.

[46]  D. Doherty,et al.  The value of virtual reality-simulator training in the development of laparoscopic surgical skills. , 2006, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[47]  R McCloy,et al.  Virtual reality in surgery , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[48]  M P Schijven,et al.  Determination of face validity for the Simbionix LAP mentor virtual reality training module. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[49]  Nader N Massarweh,et al.  Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough? , 2004, The Journal of surgical research.

[50]  G. Ramsay,et al.  Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial , 1994, The Lancet.

[51]  Daniel B. Jones,et al.  Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? , 2000, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.