Stratigraphic and structural connectivity

Abstract The connectivity of a reservoir to a well-bore represents a fundamental initial condition for drainage of an oil or gas field. The size of the static connected volume is a function of the stratigraphic and structural architecture of the reservoir. The most important stratigraphic factor affecting connectivity is a net-to-gross threshold which determines whether a reservoir is highly or poorly connected. Other stratigraphic factors affecting connectivity are those that impact the reservoir dimensionality (for example, compartmentalizing continuous mudstones or parallel channel deposits) and the size of geobodies relative to the total reservoir size. Structural compartmentalization may cause fault compartments that are too small in volume to support reservoir connectivity: as the size of the geobodies approaches compartment size, connectivity is typically less predictable. Static connected volumes alone do not predict flow performance, but are a component in predicting flow performance. To more completely address predictions of flow performance, dynamic connectivity is sometimes considered. However, dynamic connectivity, which is dependent on fluid type, permeability heterogeneity, time and other factors, confuses connectivity with tortuosity and sweep- and displacement-efficiency and is probably best avoided. Finally a connectivity flow diagram is proposed as a guide to help formulate key questions concerning uncertain reservoir parameters affecting reservoir connectivity.

[1]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  The Influence of Sample Size and Permeability Distribution on Heterogeneity Measures , 1988 .

[2]  David K. Larue,et al.  The controversy concerning stratigraphic architecture of channelized reservoirs and recovery by waterflooding , 2005, Petroleum Geoscience.

[3]  J A Sethian,et al.  A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Henry W. Posamentier,et al.  Seismic Geomorphology and Stratigraphy of Depositional Elements in Deep-Water Settings , 2003 .

[5]  Peter R. King,et al.  The Connectivity and Conductivity of Overlapping Sand Bodies , 1990 .

[6]  D. Larue,et al.  Connectivity of channelized reservoirs: a modelling approach , 2006, Petroleum Geoscience.

[7]  K. B. Hird,et al.  Quantification of reservoir connectivity for reservoir description applications , 1995 .

[8]  P. R. Ballin,et al.  New Reservoir Dynamic Connectivity Measurement for Efficient Well Placement Strategy Analysis Under Depletion , 2002 .

[9]  J. A. Sethian,et al.  Fast Marching Methods , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[10]  D. Larue,et al.  Flow units, connectivity, and reservoir characterization in a wave-dominated deltaic reservoir: Meren reservoir, Nigeria , 2004 .

[11]  A. Journel,et al.  Reservoir Modeling Using Multiple-Point Statistics , 2001 .

[12]  James A. Sethian,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods , 1999 .

[13]  P. Alstrøm,et al.  COMPLEXITY AND CRITICALITY , 2004 .

[14]  R. Ainsworth Sequence stratigraphic-based analysis of reservoir connectivity: influence of sealing faults – a case study from a marginal marine depositional setting , 2006, Petroleum Geoscience.

[15]  D. Larue Outcrop and Waterflood Simulation Modeling of the 100-Foot Channel Complex, Texas, and the Ainsa II Channel Complex, Spain: Analogs to Multistory and Multilateral Channelized Slope Reservoirs , 2004 .

[16]  J. Allen,et al.  Studies in fluviatile sedimentation: an exploratory quantitative model for the architecture of avulsion-controlled alluvial suites , 1978 .

[17]  David K. Larue,et al.  Static characterizations of reservoirs: refining the concepts of connectivity and continuity , 2007, Petroleum Geoscience.

[18]  Quentin J. Fisher,et al.  Treatment of faults in production simulation models , 2007 .

[19]  Mohan Kelkar,et al.  Conditional Simulation Method for Reservoir Description Using Spatial and Well-Performance Constraints , 1994 .

[20]  Hong Tang,et al.  Incorporation of Spatial Characteristics Into Volcanic Facies and Favorable Reservoir Prediction , 2006 .

[21]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  A review of heterogeneity measures used in reservoir characterization , 1989 .

[22]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  Conditional Indicator Simulation: Application to a Saskatchewan uranium deposit , 1984 .

[23]  Eulogio Pardo-Igúzquiza,et al.  CONNEC3D: a computer program for connectivity analysis of 3D random set models☆ , 2003 .

[24]  C. Rossen,et al.  Course Notes 40: Deep-Water Sandstones, Brushy Canyon Formation, West Texas , 1999 .

[25]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  A Statistical Study of Reservoir Permeability: Distributions, Correlations, and Averages , 1987 .