The Efficacy of Several Writing Feedback Systems

Over the years, a number of systems have been developed or adapted for use in grading the work of students in written business communication courses. Although the "perfect" system most likely has not been developed, a number of those currently used fulfill theirgoal of helping students become more profi cientwriters. Some systems undoubtedly fulfill their goal more effectively than others, however. Regardless of which feedback system an instructor uses, he/she needs to be aware of its advantages and disadvantages as well as ways to maximize its effectiveness. This article provides a review of three different systems: written comments, conferences, and peer evaluation.

[1]  Winnifred F. Taylor,et al.  The Effect of Praise upon the Quality and Quantity Of Creative Writing , 1966 .

[2]  Thomas C. Gee.  Students' Responses to Teacher Comments. , 1972 .

[3]  Charles R. Duke.  The Student-Centered Conference and the Writing Process. , 1975 .

[4]  R. Hausner.  INTERACTION OF SELECTED STUDENT PERSONALITY FACTORS AND TEACHERS' COMMENTS IN A SEQUENTIALLY-DEVELOPED COMPOSITION CURRICULUM. , 1975 .

[5]  Sarah Freedman.  The Evaluators of Student Writing. , 1978 .

[6]  Catherine Lynch,et al.  Evaluating Our Evaluations. , 1978 .

[7]  Barbara Fassler.  The Red Pen Revisited: Teaching Composition through Student Conferences. , 1978 .

[8]  Sarah Warshauer Freedman.  College Students Reveal Their Learning Processes. , 1979 .

[9]  C. Knoblauch,et al.  Teacher Commentary on Student Writing: The State of the Art. , 1981 .

[10]  N. Sommers.  Responding to Student Writing , 1982 .

[11]  G. Hillocks,et al.  The Interaction of Instruction, Teacher Comment, and Revision in Teaching the Composing Process. , 1982 .

[12]  Daniel R. Wunsch.  The Effects of Written Feedback, Rewriting, and Group Oral Feedback on Business Letter Writing Ability. , 1982 .

[13]  Linda Weiner.  The Composition Class: Outward Bound. , 1984 .

[14]  Commentary That Worksfor the Learning Business Writer , 1985 .

[15]  George Hillocks,et al.  Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. , 1986 .

[16]  M. Robertson.  "Is Anybody Listening?": Responding to Student Writing , 1986 .

[17]  Robert E. Land,et al.  What Our Students Taught Us about Paper Marking. , 1987 .

[18]  Dana Heller.  Silencing the Soundtrack: An Alternative to Marginal Comments. , 1989 .

[19]  A. Hunt.  Taped Comments and Student Writing. , 1989 .

[20]  Joel P. Bowman,et al.  The Application of Behavioral Techniques to Business Communication Instruction , 1989 .

[21]  Michal Zellermayer,et al.  The study of teachers' written feedback to students' writing: changes in theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts , 1989 .

[22]  Kenneth D. Chastain,et al.  Characteristics of Graded and Ungraded Compositions. , 1990 .

[23]  Ken Hyland,et al.  PROVIDING PRODUCTIVE FEEDBACK , 1990 .

[24]  Mike Gilbert.  Responding to Writers: What I Value. , 1990 .

[25]  Kevin Davis.  Notes from the Inside. , 1991 .

[26]  Steven Golen,et al.  Peer Evaluation of Writing in Business Communication Classes. , 1992 .

[27]  C. G. Pearce,et al.  Audiotaped Feedback in Business Writing: An Exploratory Study , 1995 .

[28]  Karen K. Waner,et al.  Student and Instructor Use of Comments on Business Communication Papers , 1996 .