Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of lesion size on the positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy in MRI-detected breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was performed of 666 consecutive nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions that had MRI-guided localization. MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5-T magnet. Lesions were measured by the interpreting radiologist before biopsy. Malignancy rate versus lesion size was determined. RESULTS The median MRI lesion size was 1 cm (range, 0.3-7.0 cm). Malignancy was present in 149/666 (22%) lesions, of which 80 (54%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 66 (44%) were invasive cancer, and three (2%) were lymphoma. The frequency of malignancy increased significantly (p = 0.0005) with lesion size, with malignancy found in one (3%) of 37 lesions less than 5 mm, 44 (17%) of 254 lesions 5-9 mm, 37 (25%) of 151 lesions 10-14 mm, 21 (28%) of 74 lesions 15-19 mm, and 46 (31%) of 150 lesions 20 mm or larger. Lesions less than 5 mm accounted for 37 (6%) of 666 lesions that had a biopsy and one (< 1%) of 149 cancers (one DCIS). Among lesions less than 10 mm, the likelihood of malignancy was highest in postmenopausal women (22% malignant) and in the extent of disease setting (22% malignant), and lowest in premenopausal women (10% malignant) and in the high-risk screening setting (10% malignant). CONCLUSION The PPV of biopsy for lesions identified at breast MRI using a 1.5-T magnet significantly increased with increasing lesion size. Biopsy is rarely necessary for lesions smaller than 5 mm because of their low (3%) likelihood of cancer. Further work is needed to develop an algorithm that uses size in addition to other patient and lesion factors to guide biopsy recommendations for MRI-detected breast lesions.

[1]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Carles Arús,et al.  Adult primitive neuroectodermal tumor: proton MR spectroscopic findings with possible application for differential diagnosis. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  L. Liberman,et al.  Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast‐enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  E A Sickles,et al.  Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M S Soo,et al.  Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  G. Glover,et al.  Breast lesion localization: a freehand, interactive MR imaging-guided technique. , 1998, Radiology.

[11]  E Grabbe,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Guided Localization and Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Lesions , 1998, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[12]  C K Kuhl,et al.  Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device. , 1997, Radiology.

[13]  M D Schnall,et al.  Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. , 1997, Radiology.

[14]  E Grabbe,et al.  Stereotaxic add-on device for MR-guided biopsy of breast lesions. , 1996, Radiology.

[15]  C. Floyd,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[17]  E Grabbe,et al.  MR imaging-guided breast intervention: experience with two systems. , 1995, Radiology.

[18]  H. Bruhn,et al.  MR‐Guided Localization of Suspected Breast Lesions Detected Exclusively by Postcontrast MRI , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  E. Sickles.  Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. , 1994, Radiology.

[20]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.