Rethinking STEM Education: An Interdisciplinary STEAM Curriculum

Abstract The State University of New York at Potsdam, with support from Lockheed Martin, has developed a multidisciplinary program intended to foster creative thinking by combining studies in the arts, humanities, and STEM fields. The College has a long tradition of innovative education in the arts, natural and social sciences, computer science, and mathematics. This “STEAM” approach will support the development of versatile professionals for the evolving workplace. To develop this program, a team of STEAM faculty members examined existing literature on the development of creativity as well as multidisciplinary models in industry, business, and education. Through academic restructuring of traditional educational models, this curriculum will be at the forefront of engaging learners in team-based multidisciplinary problem solving through mentoring, learning communities, research projects, and partnerships with outside agencies. The program is a model for the education of scientists who will be able to create innovations in modern science and technology necessary to address the complex problems facing human society.

[1]  A. Lenz,et al.  Encouraging Connections: Integrating Expressive Art and Drama Into Therapeutic Social Skills Training With Adolescents , 2010 .

[2]  Paula Olszewski-Kubilius,et al.  Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education , 2011, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[3]  M. Mumford,et al.  The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review , 2004 .

[4]  Richard S. Mansfield,et al.  The Effectiveness of Creativity Training , 1978 .

[5]  Brad Hokanson,et al.  Creativity in the training and practice of instructional designers: the Design/Creativity Loops model , 2012 .

[6]  Peter Coaldrake,et al.  Implications for Higher Education of the Public Sector Reform Agenda. , 1995 .

[7]  Chunfang Zhou,et al.  Integrating creativity training into Problem and Project-Based Learning curriculum in engineering education , 2012 .

[8]  Alexander Karp,et al.  Teachers of the Mathematically Gifted Tell About Themselves and Their Profession , 2010 .

[9]  Ellen Winner,et al.  Does studying the arts engender creative thinking? Evidence for near but not far transfer , 2000 .

[10]  Ryan Hargrove,et al.  Fostering creativity in the design studio: A framework towards effective pedagogical practices , 2012 .

[11]  Sergey Kukushkin,et al.  The problem of engineering creativity in Russia: a critical review , 2012 .

[12]  Martin L. Perl DEVELOPING CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE , 2008 .

[13]  Jeffery D. Houghton,et al.  Narrowing the Creativity Gap: The Moderating Effects of Perceived Support for Creativity , 2011, The Journal of psychology.

[14]  Linda L. Autry,et al.  Artistic Representation: Promoting Student Creativity and Self-Reflection , 2011 .

[15]  T. Rickards Creativity and problem solving at work , 1990 .

[16]  Hsen-Hsing Ma A Synthetic Analysis of the Effectiveness of Single Components and Packages in Creativity Training Programs , 2006 .

[17]  A. Koestler The Act of Creation , 1964 .

[18]  Ellen Winner,et al.  Does Studying the Arts Engender Creative Thinking , 1999 .

[19]  Pamela Burnard,et al.  Reframing creativity and technology: promoting pedagogic change in music education , 2007 .

[20]  Bill Crow,et al.  Changing conceptions of educational creativity: a study of student teachers’ experience of musical creativity , 2008 .

[21]  Robyn Gibson,et al.  The ‘art’ of creative teaching: implications for higher education , 2010 .

[22]  John F. Feldhusen,et al.  Assessing and Accessing Creativity: An Integrative Review of Theory, Research, and Development , 1995 .

[23]  Rene Victor Valqui Vidal,et al.  Creativity and problem Solving , 2004 .

[24]  J. Avery Critical review. , 2006, The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society.