Information sharing and coordination in make-to-order supply chains

Abstract This research, based on our observations of an industrial vendor–manufacturer relationship, investigates the impact of information sharing and physical flow coordination in a make-to-order supply chain. We mathematically model and develop simulation-based rolling schedule procedures for analyzing the manufacturer's ordering policies, transportation activities, and the vendor's manufacturing and order fulfillment processes under five alternative integration strategies. Our objective is to measure the value of information sharing and system coordination across the strategies, identify whether the source of the benefits come from information sharing or coordination, study the allocation of system benefits among channel members, and analyze the impact of environmental factors on system cost performance. The experimental results indicate a 47.58% cost reduction moving from a traditional supply chain to a fully integrated system. While information sharing reduces costs, the main economic benefit comes from coordinated decision-making. The savings associated with system integration are not equally allocated among channel members, and vary by strategy. The procedures developed in the research provide economic insight that fosters the sharing of technological and strategic efforts.

[1]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Foundations of Inventory Management , 2000 .

[2]  Jeff Hoi Yan Yeung,et al.  Parameters affecting the effectiveness of MRP systems: A review , 1998 .

[3]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  Supply chain benefits from advanced customer commitments , 1999 .

[4]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[5]  B J La Londe,et al.  THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY 2000 SURVEY OF CAREER PATTERNS IN LOGISTICS , 2000 .

[6]  John B. Houlihan International supply chain management , 1985 .

[7]  William L. Berry,et al.  MEASURING MASTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULE STABILITY UNDER ROLLING PLANNING HORIZONS , 1988 .

[8]  Li-Lian Gao,et al.  Uncapacitated facility location: General solution procedure and computational experience , 1994 .

[9]  Dean H. Kropp,et al.  A comparison of strategies to dampen nervousness in MRP systems , 1986 .

[10]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability with Scheduled Ordering Policies , 1999 .

[11]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain , 2000 .

[12]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Customer-order information, leadtimes, and inventories , 1995 .

[13]  J. Fransoo,et al.  Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain , 2000 .

[14]  Frank Y. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information.: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information. , 2000 .

[15]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[16]  Klaus Zoller,et al.  Efficient heuristics for dynamic lot sizing , 1988 .

[17]  David Frederick Ross Supply Chain Inventory Management , 1998 .

[18]  Joseph A. Orlicky,et al.  Material Requirements Planning: The New Way of Life in Production and Inventory Management , 1975 .

[19]  Felipe K. Tan Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem with Periodic Ordering , 1974 .

[20]  William L. Berry,et al.  Manufacturing Planning and Control Systems , 1984 .

[21]  David F. Pyke,et al.  Exploiting timely demand information to reduce inventories , 1996 .

[22]  Powell E. Robinson,et al.  Flow Coordination and Information Sharing in Supply Chains: Review, Implications, and Directions for Future Research , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[23]  Li-Lian Gao,et al.  A Dual Ascent Procedure for Multiproduct Dynamic Demand Coordinated Replenishment with Backlogging , 1996 .

[24]  Herbert E. Scarf,et al.  Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem , 1960, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Morris A. Cohen,et al.  The Stabilizing Effect of Inventory in Supply Chains , 1998, Oper. Res..

[26]  R. Kapuściński,et al.  Value of Information in Capacitated Supply Chains , 1999 .

[27]  James M Masters,et al.  THE 1992 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY SURVEY OF CAREER PATTERNS IN LOGISTICS. , 1990 .

[28]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 1997 .

[29]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[30]  V. Sridharan,et al.  Freezing the Master Production Schedule Under Rolling Planning Horizons , 1987 .

[31]  F. Barry Lawrence,et al.  Coordinated Capacitated Lot-Sizing Problem with Dynamic Demand: A Lagrangian Heuristic , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[32]  Harvey M. Wagner,et al.  Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information , 2000 .

[34]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  A Comparison of Reorder Point and Material Requirements Planning Inventory Control Logic , 1992 .

[35]  Seungjin Whang,et al.  Coordination in operations: A taxonomy , 1995 .

[36]  David Taylor Measurement and Analysis of Demand Amplification Across the Supply Chain , 1999 .

[37]  S. Graves A multiechelon inventory model with fixed replenishment intervals , 1996 .

[38]  M. Reiman,et al.  Echelon Reorder Points, Installation Reorder Points, and the Value of Centralized Demand Information , 1998 .

[39]  Hartmut Stadtler,et al.  Improved rolling schedules for the dynamic single level lot sizing problem , 2000 .

[40]  Michael J. Fry,et al.  Focused Issue: The Use of Information in Managing Supply Chains, Part 2 of 2: Coordinating Production and Delivery Under a (z, Z)-Type Vendor-Managed Inventory Contract , 2001, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..