The effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on recollection: the case of vaccine misinformation

Designing effective communication strategies for correcting vaccines misinformation requires an understanding of how the target group might react to information from different sources. The present study examined whether erroneous inferences about vaccination could be effectively corrected by a perceived credible (i.e. expert or trustworthy) source. Two experiments are reported using a standard continued influence paradigm, each featuring two correction conditions on vaccine misinformation. Participants were presented with a story containing a piece of information that was later retracted by a perceived credible or not so credible source. Experiment 1 showed that providing a correction reduced participants’ use of the original erroneous information, yet the overall reliance on misinformation did not significantly differ between the low- and high-expertise correction groups. Experiment 2 revealed that a correction from a high-trustworthy source decreased participants’ reliance on misinformation when making inferences; nonetheless, it did not positively affect the reported intent to vaccinate one’s child. Overall, source trustworthiness was more relevant than source expertise.

[1]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Protecting consumers from fraudulent health claims: A taxonomy of psychological drivers, interventions, barriers, and treatments. , 2020, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation , 2013, Memory & Cognition.

[3]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  D. Albarracín,et al.  Conceptualizing the Influence of Social Agents of Behavior Change: a Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Hiv-prevention Interventionists for Different Groups , 2022 .

[5]  Unidentified.  The Debunking Handbook , 2012 .

[6]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and coping with the post-truth era , 2017 .

[7]  Mark J. Hurlstone,et al.  Going with the Grain of Cognition: Applying Insights from Psychology to Build Support for Childhood Vaccination , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[8]  Melissa M. Eitzen,et al.  Vaccines for Biodefense and Emerging and Neglected Diseases , 2009 .

[9]  Dan Sarel,et al.  Comparative Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Involvement and Source Credibility , 1991 .

[10]  Frank M. Russell,et al.  Civility, credibility, and health information: The impact of uncivil comments and source credibility on attitudes about vaccines , 2019, Public understanding of science.

[11]  E. Shapiro,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Mothers' Decision-Making About Vaccines for Infants: The Importance of Trust , 2006, Pediatrics.

[12]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn’t, and Why? An Experimental Study of the Mechanisms of Cultural Cognition , 2010, Law and human behavior.

[13]  W. Crano,et al.  Mass media and drug prevention : classic and contemporary theories and research , 2002 .

[14]  Sylvain Billiard,et al.  Beyond Rational Decision-Making: Modelling the Influence of Cognitive Biases on the Dynamics of Vaccination Coverage , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  S. Ratzan,et al.  Addressing the vaccine confidence gap , 2011, The Lancet.

[16]  N. Sevdalis,et al.  Attitudes to vaccination: a critical review. , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[17]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Joanne M. Miller,et al.  Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust , 2016 .

[19]  D. Hammond,et al.  Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[20]  L. Moulton,et al.  Factors associated with refusal of childhood vaccines among parents of school-aged children: a case-control study. , 2005, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[21]  Cornelia Betsch,et al.  Using Behavioral Insights to Increase Vaccination Policy Effectiveness , 2015 .

[22]  B. A. Conway,et al.  The effects of laforin, malin, Stbd1, and Ptg deficiencies on heart glycogen levels in Pompe disease mouse models , 2015 .

[23]  J. Pepper,et al.  Source Credibility in Tobacco Control Messaging. , 2016, Tobacco regulatory science.

[24]  Angeline C. Scheinbaum,et al.  Enhancing Brand Credibility Via Celebrity Endorsement , 2017, Journal of Advertising Research.

[25]  Stephen M. Ritchie,et al.  Writing Stories to Enhance Scientific Literacy , 2011 .

[26]  B. Nyhan,et al.  Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information. , 2015, Vaccine.

[27]  C. D. Ward,et al.  Better Liked than Right , 1980 .

[28]  Chanthika Pornpitakpan.  The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence , 2004 .

[29]  C. Vincent,et al.  Omission bias and vaccine rejection by parents of healthy children: implications for the influenza A/H1N1 vaccination programme. , 2010, Vaccine.

[30]  Hollyn M. Johnson,et al.  Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. , 1994 .

[31]  Xiaoli Nan.  Perceived Source Credibility and Advertising Persuasiveness: An Investigation of Moderators and Psychological Processes , 2013 .

[32]  Thomas Koch,et al.  When Debunking Scientific Myths Fails (and When It Does Not) , 2016 .

[33]  S. Benegal.  Overconfidence and the discounting of expertise: A commentary. , 2018, Social science & medicine.

[34]  Timothy Callaghan,et al.  Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. , 2018, Social science & medicine.

[35]  A. Newmark,et al.  Motivated Reasoning, Political Sophistication, and Associations between President Obama and Islam , 2012, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[36]  E. Akl,et al.  Using narratives to impact health policy-making: a systematic review , 2019, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[37]  J. Wardle,et al.  Trust and Experience as Predictors of HPV Vaccine Acceptance , 2007, Human vaccines.

[38]  Priya Shetty,et al.  Experts concerned about vaccination backlash , 2010, The Lancet.

[39]  D. Albarracín,et al.  The Effects of Source Credibility in the Presence or Absence of Prior Attitudes: Implications for the Design of Persuasive Communication Campaigns. , 2010, Journal of applied social psychology.

[40]  L. Ross,et al.  Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information , 1980 .

[41]  Helena Miton,et al.  Cognitive Obstacles to Pro-Vaccination Beliefs , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  L. Archer.  Validating Vaccines: Understanding the Rhetorical Dynamics of Expertise Amid a Manufactured Controversy , 2014 .

[43]  Michael F. Dahlstrom.  Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  H. Larson,et al.  Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy - A systematic review. , 2015, Vaccine.

[45]  Lucy Avraamidou,et al.  Tell me a Story: the use of narrative as a learning tool for natural selection , 2017 .

[46]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  The Role of Familiarity in Correcting Inaccurate Information , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  M. Myers,et al.  Misinformation about Vaccines , 2009 .

[48]  S. Clark,et al.  Sources and Perceived Credibility of Vaccine-Safety Information for Parents , 2011, Pediatrics.

[49]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  “Attention: Myth Follows!” Facilitated Communication, Parent and Professional Attitudes towards Evidence-based Practice, and the Power of Misinformation , 2015 .

[50]  M. Fallah,et al.  Overcoming distrust to deliver universal health coverage: lessons from Ebola , 2019, BMJ.

[51]  B. Nyhan,et al.  Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial , 2014, Pediatrics.

[52]  S. Della Sala,et al.  Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies , 2017, PloS one.

[53]  A. Wilkes,et al.  Editing Episodic Memory following the Identification of Error , 1988 .

[54]  Lisa Geraci,et al.  Correcting erroneous inferences in memory: The role of source credibility , 2013 .

[55]  A. A. Lumsdaine.  Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[56]  K. Wilson,et al.  Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental beliefs and attitudes toward childhood vaccination identifies common barriers to vaccination. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[57]  R. Rappuoli,et al.  A Crisis of Public Confidence in Vaccines , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[58]  K. Jamieson,et al.  Intentions to use a novel Zika vaccine: the effects of misbeliefs about the MMR vaccine and perceptions about Zika , 2018, Journal of public health.

[59]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[60]  Caroline Watt,et al.  Parents’ beliefs in misinformation about vaccines are strengthened by pro-vaccine campaigns , 2019, Cognitive Processing.

[61]  Heidi J. Larson,et al.  The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation , 2018, Nature.

[62]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Misinformation and Its Correction , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.