Rapid Electronic Provider Documentation Design and Implementation in an Academic Pediatric Emergency Department

Background Many emergency departments are transitioning from paper charting to full electronic health records, which include both computerized provider order entry and provider documentation. Implementation of electronic provider documentation (EPD), in particular, has been challenging. Known benefits include legibility, medicolegal and compliance safeguards, and improved access to patient charts. Offsetting these benefits may be reductions in efficiency, patient throughput, and less provider-patient interaction. Methods We used a rapid design process coupled with Lean principles, simulation, aggressive training, and continuous process improvement to design and implement a novel EPD system with real-time voice recognition dictation in the pediatric emergency department (PED). We used statistical process control methodologies to compare mean PED lengths of stay (LOSs) for admitted and discharged patients before and after EPD GoLive. Results We were able to design, test, train, and implement a novel EPD to the PED within 7 months. There was special cause variation, with a 2.7% (5-minute) increase in overall LOS after EPD implementation. There was a temporary 9.3% (15-minute) increase in discharge LOS for 6 weeks after GoLive, with a subsequent return to a new baseline of 4.3% (7-minute) increase. There were no significant changes in admission LOS. There was overall consistent use of the voice recognition system several months after EPD rollout. There have been improving rates of compliance with chart completion over time, as a result of easier tracking and electronic reminders to complete. Conclusion Despite the inherent challenges involved in transitioning from paper charting to EPD, our study showed that an academic ED, EPD, can be rapidly designed and implemented while not significantly negatively impacting ED metrics such as LOS. We had consistent use of the voice dictation system after implementation. Time spent documenting after clinical shift was not reliably captured and is an important area of future research for successful EPD implementation.

[1]  F Barrueto,et al.  34 Analyzing the Impact of Electronic Charting on Physician Productivity and Charge Capture Using Statistical Process Control: A Pilot Study , 2012 .

[2]  Bryan J. Weiner,et al.  Stage 1 of the meaningful use incentive program for electronic health records: a study of readiness for change in ambulatory practice settings in one integrated delivery system , 2014, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[3]  Sun Young Park,et al.  The effects of EMR deployment on doctors' work practices: A qualitative study in the emergency department of a teaching hospital , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  David D. McDonald,et al.  Programs , 1984, CL.

[5]  R. G. Zick,et al.  Voice recognition software versus a traditional transcription service for physician charting in the ED. , 2001, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[6]  Mark W Friedberg,et al.  Factors Affecting Physician Professional Satisfaction and Their Implications for Patient Care, Health Systems, and Health Policy. , 2013, Rand health quarterly.

[7]  J. Milbrandt,et al.  Typed Versus Voice Recognition for Data Entry in Electronic Health Records: Emergency Physician Time Use and Interruptions , 2014, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[8]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. , 2014, Health affairs.

[9]  Robert G Hill,et al.  4000 clicks: a productivity analysis of electronic medical records in a community hospital ED. , 2013, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[10]  R. Jeanmonod,et al.  The nature of emergency department interruptions and their impact on patient satisfaction , 2010, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[11]  R. Perla,et al.  The run chart: a simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[12]  Robert M. Issenman,et al.  Use of Voice Recognition Software in an Outpatient Pediatric Specialty Practice , 2004, Pediatrics.

[13]  Zainab Kazmi Effects of exam room EHR use on doctor-patient communication: a systematic literature review. , 2013, Informatics in primary care.

[14]  D. Mathison,et al.  Evaluating the impact of the electronic health record on patient flow in a pediatric emergency department. , 2011, Applied clinical informatics.

[15]  Stephen Andrew Spooner,et al.  Impact of electronic health record implementation on patient flow metrics in a pediatric emergency department , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  M. D. Del Beccaro,et al.  Use of continuous performance improvement in academics: a culture change. , 2011, The Journal of pediatrics.

[17]  K. Saleh,et al.  Comparison of Procedural Sedation for the Reduction of Dislocated Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2014, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[18]  James Hendricks,et al.  Modifying the Toyota Production System for continuous performance improvement in an academic children's hospital. , 2009, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[19]  Nicholas Genes,et al.  Quality and safety implications of emergency department information systems. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.