The Identity, Dynamics, and Diffusion of MIS

This paper examines the key lines of inquiry that have been used in research focused on the identity, dynamics, and diffusion of MIS, as well as the strengths and weaknesses associated with each approach. We present five primary means: (1) citation analysis, (2) classification analysis, including rneta-analysis, (3) editorials and opinion pieces, (4) historical surveys of previous work, and (5) forums. We use the term “line of inquiry” since this allows us some latitude in considering dissimilar approaches—methods as well as communication channels. Using examples from the published literature on the status of MIS, we define and illustrate the five approaches. Subsequently, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each. Where possible, we extend the discussion to consider the implications of these lines of inquiry for future research.

[1]  L. Wood,et al.  From the Authors , 2003, European Respiratory Journal.

[2]  Ralph Westfall,et al.  An IS Research Relevancy Manifesto , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  RJ Paul,et al.  (IS)3: Is Information Systems an intellectual subject? , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Norma L. Joiner.  CLIENT AND COUNSELOR , 1971 .

[5]  M. Mcluhan.  Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[6]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[7]  Inger V. Eriksson,et al.  Information systems research: the 'infurgic' perspective , 1999 .

[8]  Anthony Debons,et al.  The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[10]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems, 1980-1984: Points of Work and Reference , 1986, MIS Q..

[11]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A Co-Citation Analysis , 1987, MIS Q..

[12]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  Panel: The Identity and Dynamics of MIS , 2006, IFIP TC8 WCC ISS.

[13]  Steven L. Alter.  18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace "The IT Artifact" as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  David G. Stork,et al.  Hal's Legacy: 2001's Computer as Dream and Reality , 1996 .

[15]  Morten Thanning Vendelø,et al.  Past and Future of Information Systems , 2004 .

[16]  J. Cash,et al.  Information Technology and Tomorrow's Manager , 1988 .

[17]  Ron Weber,et al.  Still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[18]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Elisabeth Rosenthal.  Crisis in the ICU. , 1988, Discover.

[21]  David Avison.  The Past and Future of Information Systems: 1976-2006 and Beyond - IFIP 19th World Computer Congress, TC-8, Information System Stream, August 21-23, 2006, Santiago, Chile , 2006, IFIP TC8 WCC ISS.

[22]  David E. Avison,et al.  Is IS an intellectual subject? , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1999 .

[24]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[25]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Information Systems Conceptual Foundations: Looking Backward and Forward , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[26]  Patricia Carlson,et al.  A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline for New Product Development , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for information systems scholars: III , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Ron Weber,et al.  Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[32]  K. Peffers,et al.  Identifying and Evaluating the Universe of Outlets for Information Systems Research: Ranking the Journals , 2003 .

[33]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  A unified classification system for research in the computing disciplines , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[34]  J. Dutton,et al.  SELLING ISSUES TO TOP MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[35]  Blake Ives,et al.  Phylogeny and Power in the IS Domain: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Stu Westin,et al.  Cross-Fertilization of Knowledge: The Case of MIS and its Reference Disciplines , 1994 .

[37]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems , 1998 .

[38]  S. Rendón.  Understanding media : the extensions of man , 1967 .

[39]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co‐citation Context Analysis and the Structure of Paradigms , 1980, J. Documentation.

[40]  Tor J. Larsen,et al.  Searching for management information systems: coherence and change in the discipline , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[41]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[42]  Soongoo Hong,et al.  Quality and Knowledge Contributions of MISQ: A Citation Analysis , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[44]  J. Pfeffer.  Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[45]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The IS Core - VIII: Defining the Core Properties of the IS Disciplines: Not Yet, Not Now , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Exploring the outlands of the MIS discipline , 1999 .

[47]  Guy Fitzgerald.  Information systems: a subject with a particular perspective, no more, no less , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972-1982: a co-citation analysis , 1986 .

[50]  George Bakehouse,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems , 2000 .

[51]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms , 2002 .

[52]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Special Section: Exploring the Outlands of the MIS Discipline , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Diana Crane,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medical History.

[55]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan , 2000 .

[56]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Dealing with Plagiarism in the Information Systems Research Community: A Look at Factors that Drive Plagiarism and Ways to Address Them , 2003, MIS Q..

[58]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[59]  R. Kurzweil.  The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence , 1998 .

[60]  Felix Stalder,et al.  The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence , 2001, CSOC.

[61]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[62]  N. Carr.  IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[63]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Pairin Katerattanakul,et al.  Is information systems a reference discipline? , 2006, CACM.

[65]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[66]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..