Factivity and presupposition in Dependent Type Semantics

Dependent type theory has been applied to natural language semantics in order to provide a formally precise and computationally adequate account of dynamic aspects of meaning. One of the frameworks of natural language semantics based on dependent type theory is Dependent Type Semantics (DTS), whose focus is on the compositional interpretations of anaphoric expressions. In this paper, we extend the framework of DTS with a mechanism to handle entailment and presupposition associated with factive verbs such as "know". Using the notion of proof objects as first-class objects, we provide a fully compositional account of presuppositional inferences triggered by factive verbs. The proposal also gives a formal reconstruction of the type-distinction between propositions and facts and thereby accounts for the lexical semantic differences between factive and non-factive verbs in a type-theoretical setting.

[1]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  Resolving questions, I , 1995 .

[2]  Pla Paul Piwek,et al.  Presupposition Projection as Proof Construction , 1999 .

[3]  G. Sundholm,et al.  Constructive generalized quantifiers , 1989, Synthese.

[4]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .

[5]  Richard Montague,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English , 1973 .

[6]  Mark Steedman,et al.  The syntactic process , 2004, Language, speech, and communication.

[7]  Zhaohui Luo,et al.  Formal semantics in modern type theories with coercive subtyping , 2012, Linguistics and Philosophy.

[8]  Christian Retoré.  The Montagovian Generative Lexicon Lambda Ty_n: a Type Theoretical Framework for Natural Language Semantics , 2013, TYPES.

[9]  Josef van Genabith,et al.  Discourse representation theory , 1988 .

[10]  Koji Mineshima,et al.  Resolving Modal Anaphora in Dependent Type Semantics , 2014, JSAI-isAI Workshops.

[11]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Semantic analysis of wh-complements , 1982 .

[12]  Res Cogitans: An Essay in Rational Psychology , 1976 .

[13]  Koji Mineshima,et al.  Context-Passing and Underspecification in Dependent Type Semantics , 2017 .

[14]  Paul Egré,et al.  QUESTION-EMBEDDING AND FACTIVITY , 2008 .

[15]  Zhaohui Luo,et al.  Natural Language Inference in Coq , 2014, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[16]  J. Armstrong.  Knowledge and Belief , 1953 .

[17]  Yusuke Kubota,et al.  Scope Parallelism in Coordination in Dependent Type Semantics , 2015, JSAI-isAI Workshops.

[18]  Line Mikkelsen.  Copular Clauses: Specification, predication and equation , 2005 .

[19]  W. van der Hoek,et al.  Epistemic logic for AI and computer science , 1995, Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science.

[20]  D. Fara.  Further Steps towards a Theory of Descriptions as Predicates , 2016 .

[21]  Irene Heim,et al.  41. Definiteness and indefiniteness , 2011 .

[22]  Wataru Uegaki,et al.  Content Nouns and the Semantics of Question-Embedding , 2015, J. Semant..

[23]  Daisuke Bekki,et al.  Calculating Projections via Type Checking , 2015 .

[24]  Daisuke Bekki,et al.  Logical Polysemy and Subtyping , 2012, JSAI-isAI Workshops.

[25]  N. A. Mccawley,et al.  The structure of the Japanese language , 1973 .

[26]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Formalization ov Coercions in Lexical Semantics , 2013 .

[27]  Rob A. van der Sandt,et al.  Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution , 1992, J. Semant..

[28]  L. Karttunen.  Syntax and Semantics of Questions , 1977 .

[29]  Terence Parsons,et al.  ON DENOTING PROPOSITIONS AND FACTS , 1993 .

[30]  Irene Heim,et al.  On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions , 2008 .

[31]  Santa Cruz,et al.  SPECIFYING WHO: ON THE STRUCTURE, MEANING, AND USE OF SPECIFICATIONAL COPULAR CLAUSES , 2004 .

[32]  Per Martin-Löf,et al.  Intuitionistic type theory , 1984, Studies in proof theory.

[33]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Quantification and Syntactic Theory , 1983 .

[34]  Aarne Ranta.  Type-Theoretical Grammar , 1995 .

[35]  Yuki Nakano,et al.  Constructive Generalized Quantifiers Revisited , 2013, JSAI-isAI Workshops.

[36]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[37]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Lexical Meaning in Context - A Web of Words , 2011 .

[38]  Koji Mineshima,et al.  An Analysis of Selectional Restrictions with Dependent Type Semantics , 2016, JSAI-isAI Workshops.

[39]  Daisuke Bekki.  Representing Anaphora with Dependent Types , 2014, LACL.

[40]  Zhaohui Luo,et al.  Common Nouns as Types , 2012, LACL.

[41]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. , 1965 .

[42]  K. Sakuma.  The structure of the Japanese language , 1951 .

[43]  J. Hintikka.  Semantics for Propositional Attitudes , 1969 .

[44]  G. Sundholm.  Proof Theory and Meaning , 1986 .