A comprehensive approach to environmental and human factors into product/service design and development. A review from an ergoecological perspective.

This article presents the results of a documentary-exploratory review of design methods and concepts associated with human and environmental factors, based on a qualitative-quantitative analysis of coincidences with the fundamentals of ergoecology and in line with sustainable dynamics, with a view to putting the principles of ergoecology into practice in product/service design and development. 61.6% of 696 documents found represent work on conceptual developments, while the remaining 38.4% refer to design methods. Searches were refined using Nvivo-10 software, and 101 documents were obtained about theoretical aspects while 17 focused on the application of methods, and these formed the analysis universe. The results show how little concern there is for working comprehensively on human and environmental aspects, and a trend toward segmentation of human and environmental aspects in the field of product/service design and development can be seen, at both concept and application/methodology levels. It was concluded from the above that comprehensive, simultaneous work is needed on human and environmental aspects, clarity and conceptual unity, in order to achieve sustainability in practical matters and ensure that ergoecology-compatible design methods are applied.

[1]  Feng Jiang,et al.  Eco-effectiveness, eco-efficiency, and the metabolism of a city: A multi-sectoral analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[2]  K.K.B. Hon,et al.  Structure and output mechanisms in Design for Environment (DfE) tools , 2012 .

[3]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  A Practical Method for Quantifying Eco‐efficiency Using Eco‐design Support Tools , 2005 .

[4]  Gabriel García-Acosta,et al.  Ergoecology: fundamentals of a new multidisciplinary field , 2014 .

[5]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[6]  M. Braungart,et al.  Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions - a strategy for eco-effective product and system design , 2007 .

[7]  Christopher D. Dudfield,et al.  Environmentally friendly power sources for aerospace applications , 2008 .

[8]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[9]  Gabriel García-Acosta,et al.  Ergoecology: evolution and challenges. , 2012, Work.

[10]  Neil Thorpe,et al.  Attitudes towards and perceptions of eco-driving and the role of feedback systems , 2013, Ergonomics.

[11]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Human and Ecological Life Cycle Tools for the Integrated Assessment of Systems (HELIAS) , 2006 .

[12]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Towards a sustainable world through human factors and ergonomics: it is all about values , 2014, Ergonomics.

[13]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Green ergonomics: definition and scope , 2013, Ergonomics.

[14]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  What Does Human Factors Research Have to do with Environmental Management? , 1992 .

[15]  Q. Yang,et al.  Eco-Design for Product Lifecycle Sustainability , 2006, 2006 4th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics.

[16]  Thomas Dyllick,et al.  Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability , 2002 .

[17]  K Martin,et al.  Designing for sustainability: ergonomics – carpe diem. , 2013, Ergonomics.

[18]  Neville Moray,et al.  Ergonomics and the global problems of the twenty-first century , 1995 .

[19]  Márcio Matias,et al.  The usability of a product can be an ally of sustainability. , 2012, Work.

[20]  Seung-Cheol Yang,et al.  Knowledge-based Methods for Integrating Carbon Footprint Prediction Techniques into New Product Designs and Engineering Changes , 2010 .

[21]  David Ernesto Puentes Lagos,et al.  Tendencias en diseño y desarrollo de productos desde el factor humano: una aproximación a la responsabilidad social , 2013 .

[22]  Michele Germani,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment simplification for modular products , 2007 .

[23]  Sajed M. Abukhader Eco-efficiency in the era of electronic commerce – should ‘Eco-Effectiveness’ approach be adopted? , 2008 .

[24]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[25]  Klaus J Zink,et al.  Designing sustainable work systems: the need for a systems approach. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  Chien-Tzu Tsai,et al.  Dynamic open innovation model of Research And Development management for enterprise globalization , 2011, First International Technology Management Conference.

[27]  Gui-Ling Wang,et al.  Integrating eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness into the design of sustainable industrial systems in China , 2011 .

[28]  K. Masui,et al.  DfE for products distributed across borders , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment.

[29]  Dave Moore,et al.  With Eloquence and Humanity? Human Factors/Ergonomics in Sustainable Human Development , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Karen Lange Morales,et al.  "Addressing Human Factors and Ergonomics in Design Process, Product Life Cycle and Innovation: Trends in Consumer Product Design" , 2011 .

[31]  Fabrice Mathieux,et al.  ReSICLED: a new Recovery Conscious Design method for complex products based on a multicriteria assessment of the recoverability. , 2008 .

[32]  Andrea Raggi,et al.  Implementing a new model to measure and assess eco-effectiveness as an indicator of sustainability , 2008 .

[33]  Volker Mauerhofer,et al.  3-D Sustainability: An approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a Sustainable Development , 2008 .

[34]  Srikanth Devanathan,et al.  Function Impact Matrix for Sustainable Concept Generation: A Designer’s Perspective , 2010 .

[35]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Tapping environmental accounting potentials of beer brewing: Information needs for successful cleaner production , 2012 .

[36]  Klaus Fischer,et al.  Do we need sustainability as a new approach in human factors and ergonomics? , 2013, Ergonomics.