Contributions to a decision support system based on depth of anesthesia signals

In the clinical practice the concerns about the administration of hypnotics and analgesics for minimally invasive diagnostics and therapeutic procedures have enormously increased in the past years. The automatic detection of changes in the signals used to evaluate the depth of anesthesia is hence of foremost importance in order to decide how to adapt the doses of hypnotics and analgesics that should be administered to patients. The aim of this work is to online detect drifts in the referred depth of anesthesia signals of patients undergoing general anesthesia. The performance of the proposed method is illustrated using BIS records previously collected from patients subject to abdominal surgery. The results show that the drifts detected by the proposed method are in accordance with the actions of the clinicians in terms of times where a change in the hypnotic or analgesic rates had occurred. This detection was performed under the presence of noise and sensor faults. The presented algorithm was also online validated. The results encourage the inclusion of the proposed algorithm in a decision support system based on depth of anesthesia signals.

[1]  Laurent Beydon,et al.  Closed-Loop Coadministration of Propofol and Remifentanil Guided by Bispectral Index: A Randomized Multicenter Study , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  Robin De Keyser,et al.  Closed loop anesthesia: are we getting close to finding the holy grail? , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  Samo Ribaric,et al.  Monitoring the Depth of Anaesthesia , 2010, Sensors.

[4]  George A. Mashour,et al.  A novel electronic algorithm for detecting potentially insufficient anesthesia: implications for the prevention of intraoperative awareness , 2009, Journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[5]  João Gama,et al.  Issues in evaluation of stream learning algorithms , 2009, KDD.

[6]  Margarida M. Silva,et al.  Total Mass TCI driven by parametric estimation , 2009, 2009 17th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[7]  Pere Caminal,et al.  Validation of the Index of Consciousness (IoC) during sedation/analgesia for ultrasonographic endoscopy , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  P. Kalia Monitoring the Depth of Anaesthesia , 2008 .

[9]  H. Mouss,et al.  Test of Page-Hinckley, an approach for fault detection in an agro-alimentary production system , 2004, 2004 5th Asian Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04EX904).

[10]  A. Yli-Hankala,et al.  Description of the Entropy™ algorithm as applied in the Datex‐Ohmeda S/5™ Entropy Module , 2004, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  S. Roberts,et al.  EEG signal processing in anaesthesia. Use of a neural network technique for monitoring depth of anaesthesia. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  N. T. Smith,et al.  Performance of the ARX-derived Auditory Evoked Potential Index as an Indicator of Anesthetic Depth: A Comparison with Bispectral Index and Hemodynamic Measures during Propofol Administration , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[13]  Martin Luginbühl,et al.  Detection of awareness with the bispectral index: two case reports. , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[14]  S L Shafer,et al.  Response Surface Model for Anesthetic Drug Interactions , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[15]  D. Notterman,et al.  Adverse Sedation Events in Pediatrics: A Critical Incident Analysis of Contributing Factors , 2000, Pediatrics.

[16]  I. Rampil A Primer for EEG Signal Processing in Anesthesia , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[17]  Peter S. Sebel,et al.  Bispectral Index Monitoring Allows Faster Emergence and Improved Recovery from Propofol, Alfentanil, and Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia , 1997 .

[18]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Applications. , 1995 .

[19]  E. S. Page CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES , 1954 .