Genetic relationships between calving interval and body condition score conditional on milk yield.

Body condition score (BCS) is a useful tool in assessing the energy status of dairy cattle. Previous research has shown that it is heritable and genetically correlated to reproductive performance. Currently, interest exists in developing selection indexes for fertility that include BCS information. Before such indexes are developed, it is important to assess the genetic covariance between BCS and fertility after fully accounting for the covariance of both traits with milk yield, as indices to predict selection responses require knowledge of these (co)variances. In the present study, calving interval (CI) was used as a measure of reproductive performance. The genetic correlations between BCS and CI before and after genetically adjusting for milk yield were -0.48 and -0.22, respectively. Thus, cows with low BCS have longer CI, which is exacerbated by high levels of milk production. Using selection index theory, we showed that selecting for milk yield alone will result in an increase of 768 kg of milk, an increase of 4.46 d in CI and a reduction of 0.41 BCS units for every standard deviation change in the index. Restricting BCS to no genetic change, whereas still selecting for milk yield will result in an increase of 653.1 kg of milk per standard deviation of the selection index. However, CI will still continue to increase at a rate of 3.20 d per standard deviation of the selection index. The selection indices used here are not optimum, in that they are not economically driven and do not consider all traits that contribute to profitability. However, they demonstrate that, even though restricting BCS may be seen as an attractive way of limiting reliance of body tissue mobilization to fuel milk production, this is unlikely to result in improvements in CI, although the rate of increase in CI will be reduced.

[1]  Eildert Groeneveld,et al.  A Generalized Computing Procedure for Setting Up and Solving Mixed Linear Models , 1990 .

[2]  J. Young,et al.  Increased milk production versus reproductive and energy status of high producing dairy cows. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  J.A.M. van Arendonk,et al.  Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers , 1991 .

[4]  J. Hillers,et al.  Relationships of body condition score to production variables in high producing Holstein dairy cattle. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  J. Hoekstra,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk production and fertility traits in upgraded dairy cattle , 1994 .

[6]  C. J. Wilcox,et al.  Genetic parameters for yield and reproductive traits of Holstein and Jersey cattle in Florida. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic correlations between linear type traits, feed intake, liveweight and condition score in Holstein Freisian dairy cattle , 1995 .

[8]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  Genetic correlations between linear type traits, food intake, live weight and condition score in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle , 1997 .

[9]  N. Cameron,et al.  Selection Indices and Prediction of Genetic Merit in Animal Breeding , 1997 .

[10]  K. Macmillan,et al.  Performance and genetic parameters for fertility of seasonal dairy cows in New Zealand , 1997 .

[11]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle , 1997 .

[12]  E. Noordhuizen-Stassen,et al.  Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review , 1998 .

[13]  R F Veerkamp,et al.  Selection for economic efficiency of dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: a review. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  The economics of fertility in the dairy herd , 1999 .

[15]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  Genetic evaluation of Holstein Friesian sires for daughter condition-score changes using a random regression model , 1999 .

[16]  W. R. Butler,et al.  Effects of energy balance on follicular development and first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows. , 2019, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[17]  Robin Thompson,et al.  Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle , 2000 .

[18]  J E Pryce,et al.  The genetic relationship between calving interval, body condition score and linear type and management traits in registered Holsteins. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic correlation between days until start of luteal activity and milk yield, energy balance, and live weights. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  A. Groen,et al.  Definition of animal breeding goals for sustainable production systems. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[21]  G. C. Emmans,et al.  Genetic evaluation of dairy bulls for energy balance traits using random regression , 2001 .

[22]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic correlations among body condition score, yield, and fertility in first-parity cows estimated by random regression models. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  The incorporation of fertility indices in genetic improvement programmes , 2001 .

[24]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic analysis of body condition score of lactating Dutch Holstein and Red-and-White heifers. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  G. Simm,et al.  The relationship between body condition score and reproductive performance. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  U. Emanuelson,et al.  Genetic and Environmental Correlations Among Female Fertility Traits and Milk Production in Different Parities of Swedish Red and White Dairy Cattle , 2001 .