Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Current Practice and Future Directions

Simple Summary Acute lymphoblastic leukemia minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to the presence of residual leukemia cells following the achievement of complete remission, but below the limit of detection using conventional morphologic assessment. Up to two thirds of children may have MRD detectable after induction therapy depending on the biological subtype and method of detection. Patients with detectable MRD have an increased likelihood of relapse. A rapid reduction of MRD reveals leukemia sensitivity to therapy and under this premise, MRD has emerged as the strongest independent predictor of individual patient outcome and is crucial for risk stratification. However, it is a poor surrogate for treatment effect on long term outcome at the trial level, with impending need of randomized trials to prove efficacy of MRD-adapted interventions. Abstract Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer and advances in its clinical and laboratory biology have grown exponentially over the last few decades. Treatment outcome has improved steadily with over 90% of patients surviving 5 years from initial diagnosis. This success can be attributed in part to the development of a risk stratification approach to identify those subsets of patients with an outstanding outcome that might qualify for a reduction in therapy associated with fewer short and long term side effects. Likewise, recognition of patients with an inferior prognosis allows for augmentation of therapy, which has been shown to improve outcome. Among the clinical and biological variables known to impact prognosis, the kinetics of the reduction in tumor burden during initial therapy has emerged as the most important prognostic variable. Specifically, various methods have been used to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) with flow cytometric and molecular detection of antigen receptor gene rearrangements being the most common. However, many questions remain as to the optimal timing of these assays, their sensitivity, integration with other variables and role in treatment allocation of various ALL subgroups. Importantly, the emergence of next generation sequencing assays is likely to broaden the use of these assays to track disease evolution. This review will discuss the biological basis for utilizing MRD in risk assessment, the technical approaches and limitations of MRD detection and its emerging applications.

[1]  J. Bartram,et al.  Monitoring MRD in ALL: Methodologies, technical aspects and optimal time points for measurement. , 2020, Seminars in hematology.

[2]  M. Loh,et al.  Successful Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed T Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: Results From Children's Oncology Group AALL0434. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Xiaotu Ma,et al.  Feasibility of monitoring peripheral blood to detect emerging clones in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia† , 2020, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[4]  L. Anelli,et al.  Digital PCR: A Reliable Tool for Analyzing and Monitoring Hematologic Malignancies , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[5]  A. Yeoh,et al.  Identifying IGH disease clones for MRD monitoring in childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia using RNA-Seq , 2020, Leukemia.

[6]  Yong-Mi Kim,et al.  Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[7]  Robin Foà,et al.  Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Technical and Clinical Advances , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[8]  K. Stamatopoulos,et al.  Standardized next-generation sequencing of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations for MRD marker identification in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; a EuroClonality-NGS validation study , 2019, Leukemia.

[9]  L. Anelli,et al.  Next-Generation Sequencing in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[10]  M. Loh,et al.  Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Does Not Improve the Poor Outcome of Children With Hypodiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report From Children's Oncology Group. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  C. Pui,et al.  Outcome of Children With Hypodiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Retrospective Multinational Study. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Yu-Hong Chen,et al.  Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Especially Haploidentical, May Improve Long-Term Survival for High-Risk Pediatric Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Era. , 2019, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[13]  R. Foà,et al.  Digital-Droplet PCR, an Accurate Method for IG/TR PCR-MRD Stratification in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2018, Blood.

[14]  B. Wood,et al.  Validation of Minimal Residual Disease as Surrogate Endpoint for Event-Free Survival in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2018, JNCI cancer spectrum.

[15]  V. Prasad,et al.  Eliminating MRD — FDA approval of blinatumomab for B-ALL in complete remission , 2018, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[16]  M. Loh,et al.  Dasatinib Plus Intensive Chemotherapy in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of Children's Oncology Group Trial AALL0622. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M. Loh,et al.  Measurable residual disease detection by high-throughput sequencing improves risk stratification for pediatric B-ALL. , 2018, Blood.

[18]  K. McKinnon Flow Cytometry: An Overview , 2018, Current Protocols in Immunology.

[19]  R. Wade,et al.  Genotype-Specific Minimal Residual Disease Interpretation Improves Stratification in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  K. McKinnon Multiparameter Conventional Flow Cytometry. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[21]  R. Pieters,et al.  Predictive value of minimal residual disease in Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with imatinib in the European intergroup study of post-induction treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, based on immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor a , 2017, Haematologica.

[22]  B. Wood,et al.  How do we measure MRD in ALL and how should measurements affect decisions. Re: Treatment and prognosis? , 2017, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[23]  D. Berry,et al.  Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Clinical Outcome in Pediatric and Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Meta-analysis , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[24]  M. Trková,et al.  Monitoring of childhood ALL using BCR-ABL1 genomic breakpoints identifies a subgroup with CML-like biology. , 2017, Blood.

[25]  E. Froňková,et al.  Next-generation sequencing indicates false-positive MRD results and better predicts prognosis after SCT in patients with childhood ALL , 2017, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[26]  A Orfao,et al.  Next Generation Flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma , 2017, Leukemia.

[27]  Quentin Lecrevisse,et al.  Standardized flow cytometry for highly sensitive MRD measurements in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2017, Blood.

[28]  Pui,et al.  Clinical Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Children with Different Subtypes of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Response-Adapted Therapy , 2016, Leukemia.

[29]  R. Pieters,et al.  Successful Therapy Reduction and Intensification for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring: Study ALL10 From the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  S. Adachi,et al.  Impact of pretransplant minimal residual disease on the post‐transplant outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2016, Pediatric transplantation.

[31]  R. Foà,et al.  Comparative analysis between RQ‐PCR and digital‐droplet‐PCR of immunoglobulin/T‐cell receptor gene rearrangements to monitor minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia , 2016, British journal of haematology.

[32]  J. Harbott,et al.  Dexamethasone vs prednisone in induction treatment of pediatric ALL: results of the randomized trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000. , 2016, Blood.

[33]  R. Wade,et al.  Excellent outcome of minimal residual disease-defined low-risk patients is sustained with more than 10 years follow-up: results of UK paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia trials 1997–2003 , 2016, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[34]  J. Downing,et al.  Outcome of children with hypodiploid ALL treated with risk-directed therapy based on MRD levels. , 2015, Blood.

[35]  M. Loh,et al.  Capizzi-Style Methotrexate with Pegasparagase (C-MTX) Is Superior to High-Dose Methotrexate (HDMTX) in T-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL): Results from Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL0434 , 2015 .

[36]  Traci M. Blonquist,et al.  Intravenous pegylated asparaginase versus intramuscular native Escherichia coli L-asparaginase in newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (DFCI 05-001): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[37]  J. Downing,et al.  Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Progress Through Collaboration. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  M. Loh,et al.  Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease in high risk B-ALL: a report from Children's Oncology Group study AALL0232. , 2015, Blood.

[39]  Alberto Orfao,et al.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies. , 2015, Blood.

[40]  C. Desmarais,et al.  IgH-V(D)J NGS-MRD measurement pre- and early post-allotransplant defines very low- and very high-risk ALL patients. , 2015, Blood.

[41]  M. Loh,et al.  T-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) Shows Excellent Outcome, Lack of Significance of the Early Thymic Precursor (ETP) Immunophenotype, and Validation of the Prognostic Value of End-Induction Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Study AALL0434 , 2014 .

[42]  D. Roth V(D)J Recombination: Mechanism, Errors, and Fidelity. , 2014, Microbiology spectrum.

[43]  R. Wade,et al.  Outcome for children and young people with Early T‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated on a contemporary protocol, UKALL 2003 , 2014, British journal of haematology.

[44]  H. Abel,et al.  Detection of gene rearrangements in targeted clinical next-generation sequencing. , 2014, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[45]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Outcome of childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL): Results from DFCI protocol 05-001. , 2014 .

[46]  S. Shurtleff,et al.  Impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on minimal residual disease and outcome in childhood Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2014, Cancer.

[47]  S. Hunger,et al.  Current Concepts in Pediatric Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2014, Front. Oncol..

[48]  N. Heerema,et al.  Long-term follow-up of imatinib in pediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children's Oncology Group Study AALL0031 , 2014, Leukemia.

[49]  N. Heerema,et al.  Philadelphia chromosome-negative very high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents: results from Children’s Oncology Group Study AALL0031 , 2014, Leukemia.

[50]  M. Loh,et al.  Integrated Genomic and Mutational Profiling Of Adolescent and Young Adult ALL Identifies a High Frequency Of BCR-ABL1-Like ALL with Very Poor Outcome , 2013 .

[51]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  An Analysis Of Ph-Like ALL In Japanese Patients , 2013 .

[52]  M. Valsecchi,et al.  Philadelphia-Like Signature In Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: The AIEOP Experience , 2013 .

[53]  W. Evans,et al.  Independent prognostic value of BCR-ABL1-like signature and IKZF1 deletion, but not high CRLF2 expression, in children with B-cell precursor ALL. , 2013, Blood.

[54]  M. Loh,et al.  Assessment of end induction minimal residual disease (MRD) in childhood B precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to eliminate the need for day 14 marrow examination: A Children’s Oncology Group study. , 2013 .

[55]  R. Wade,et al.  Treatment reduction for children and young adults with low-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia defined by minimal residual disease (UKALL 2003): a randomised controlled trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[56]  M. Loh,et al.  Tyrosine kinome sequencing of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group TARGET Project. , 2013, Blood.

[57]  B. Wood,et al.  Flow cytometric monitoring of residual disease in acute leukemia. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[58]  J. Chen,et al.  Early T-cell precursor leukemia: a subtype of high risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2012, Frontiers of Medicine.

[59]  G. Lucchini,et al.  Imatinib after induction for treatment of children and adolescents with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL): a randomised, open-label, intergroup study , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[60]  Asha B. Pillai,et al.  Detectable minimal residual disease before hematopoietic cell transplantation is prognostic but does not preclude cure for children with very-high-risk leukemia. , 2012, Blood.

[61]  Xiaomin Lu,et al.  Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children's oncology group. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[62]  M. Kneba,et al.  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: monitoring minimal residual disease as a therapeutic principle. , 2012, Seminars in oncology.

[63]  D. Campana,et al.  Clinical significance of early T‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of the Tokyo Children’s Cancer Study Group Study L99‐15 , 2012, British journal of haematology.

[64]  Doron Levy,et al.  The dynamics of drug resistance: a mathematical perspective. , 2012, Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy.

[65]  J. V. van Dongen,et al.  Late MRD response determines relapse risk overall and in subsets of childhood T-cell ALL: results of the AIEOP-BFM-ALL 2000 study. , 2011, Blood.

[66]  D. Campana,et al.  Clinical significance of low levels of minimal residual disease at the end of remission induction therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2010, Blood.

[67]  N. Tosic,et al.  Clinical features of the most common fusion genes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2010, Medical oncology.

[68]  J. V. van Dongen,et al.  Molecular response to treatment redefines all prognostic factors in children and adolescents with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results in 3184 patients of the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study. , 2010, Blood.

[69]  M. Haber,et al.  Clinical significance of minimal residual disease at day 15 and at the end of therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia , 2009, British journal of haematology.

[70]  M. D. Boer,et al.  Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated within the Interfant-99 protocol , 2009, Leukemia.

[71]  Cheng Cheng,et al.  Early T-cell precursor leukaemia: a subtype of very high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[72]  E. Mejstrikova,et al.  Quantification of fusion transcript reveals a subgroup with distinct biological properties and predicts relapse in BCR/ABL-positive ALL: implications for residual disease monitoring , 2009, Leukemia.

[73]  A. Borkhardt,et al.  Prognostic value of minimal residual disease quantification before allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the ALL-REZ BFM Study Group. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[74]  Giuseppe Basso,et al.  Standardization of flow cytometric minimal residual disease evaluation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Multicentric assessment is feasible , 2008, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[75]  S. Hunger,et al.  Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children's Oncology Group study. , 2008, Blood.

[76]  J. Cayuela,et al.  Analysis of minimal residual disease by Ig/TCR gene rearrangements: guidelines for interpretation of real-time quantitative PCR data , 2007, Leukemia.

[77]  Elaine Coustan-Smith,et al.  A simplified flow cytometric assay identifies children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who have a superior clinical outcome. , 2006, Blood.

[78]  G. Basso,et al.  Drug-induced immunophenotypic modulation in childhood ALL: implications for minimal residual disease detection , 2005, Leukemia.

[79]  J. Gabert,et al.  Detection of minimal residual disease in hematologic malignancies by real-time quantitative PCR: principles, approaches, and laboratory aspects , 2003, Leukemia.

[80]  A. Biondi,et al.  Monitoring minimal residual disease using chromosomal translocations in childhood ALL. , 2002, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[81]  N. Beaubier,et al.  Comparison of Capillary Electrophoresis and Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis for the Evaluation of T and B Cell Clonality by Polymerase Chain Reaction , 2000, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[82]  W. Hop,et al.  Prognostic value of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood , 1998, The Lancet.

[83]  J. Hancock,et al.  Minimal residual disease status before allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is an important determinant of successful outcome for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 1998, Blood.

[84]  J. Gribben,et al.  A novel nested-PCR strategy for the detection of rearranged immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes in B cell tumors , 1997, Leukemia.

[85]  H. Cavé,et al.  Prospective monitoring and quantitation of residual blasts in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by polymerase chain reaction study of delta and gamma T-cell receptor genes. , 1994, Blood.

[86]  A. Morley,et al.  Outcome prediction in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by molecular quantification of residual disease at the end of induction , 1994, The Lancet.

[87]  J. Condon,et al.  Detection and quantitation of neoplastic cells in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, by use of the polymerase chain reaction , 1991, British journal of haematology.

[88]  F. Galibert,et al.  In vitro amplification of T cell gamma gene rearrangements: a new tool for the assessment of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemias. , 1989, Leukemia.