Mindful judgment and decision making.

A full range of psychological processes has been put into play to explain judgment and choice phenomena. Complementing work on attention, information integration, and learning, decision research over the past 10 years has also examined the effects of goals, mental representation, and memory processes. In addition to deliberative processes, automatic processes have gotten closer attention, and the emotions revolution has put affective processes on a footing equal to cognitive ones. Psychological process models provide natural predictions about individual differences and lifespan changes and integrate across judgment and decision making (JDM) phenomena. "Mindful" JDM research leverages our knowledge about psychological processes into causal explanations for important judgment and choice regularities, emphasizing the adaptive use of an abundance of processing alternatives. Such explanations supplement and support existing mathematical descriptions of phenomena such as loss aversion or hyperbolic discounting. Unlike such descriptions, they also provide entry points for interventions designed to help people overcome judgments or choices considered undesirable.

[1]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices , 2022, Theory and Decision.

[2]  Scott Flanagan,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2010 .

[3]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Decisions Under Uncertainty: Psychological, Economic, and Neuroeconomic Explanations of Risk Preference , 2009 .

[4]  E. Weber,et al.  Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Ellen E. Furlong,et al.  Cognitive Constraints on How Economic Rewards Affect Cooperation , 2009, Psychological science.

[6]  G. Bower,et al.  The evolution of a cognitive psychologist: a journey from simple behaviors to complex mental acts. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[8]  Selin A. Malkoc,et al.  Discounting Time and Time Discounting: Subjective Time Perception and Intertemporal Preferences , 2008 .

[9]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Ralph Hertwig,et al.  What impacts the impact of rare events , 2008 .

[11]  John W. Payne,et al.  Walking with the scarecrow: The information-processing approach to decision research. , 2008 .

[12]  Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck,et al.  Process Models Deserve Process Data: Comment on Brandstatter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006) , 2008, Psychological review.

[13]  E. Spelke,et al.  Explicit and implicit strategies in decision making , 2008 .

[14]  Mei Wang,et al.  What is behind the priority heuristic? A mathematical analysis and comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006). , 2008, Psychological review.

[15]  M. Birnbaum Evaluation of the priority heuristic as a descriptive model of risky decision making: comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006). , 2008, Psychological review.

[16]  Timothy J. Pleskac Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  W. Gaissmaier,et al.  Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  N. Harvey,et al.  Biased Forecasting of Postdecisional Affect , 2007, Psychological science.

[20]  R. Dhar,et al.  Preference Fluency in Choice , 2007 .

[21]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  How Is the Boss's Mood Today? I Want a Raise , 2007, Psychological science.

[22]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments. , 2007, Psychological review.

[23]  Anders Winman,et al.  The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. , 2007, Psychological review.

[24]  H. Aarts,et al.  Habit Formation and Multiple Means to Goal Attainment: Repeated Retrieval of Target Means Causes Inhibited Access to Competitors , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[25]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Gain-Loss Separability and Coalescing in Risky Decision Making , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[26]  D. Krantz,et al.  Goals and plans in decision making , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[27]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Word count: 3998 Corresponding author: , 2022 .

[28]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Information distortion in the evaluation of a single option , 2007 .

[30]  G. Gaus,et al.  Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? , 2007, Perspectives on Politics.

[31]  Henrik Olsson,et al.  Constructivist Coding , 2007, Psychological science.

[32]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  Are Morally Motivated Decision Makers Insensitive to the Consequences of Their Choices? , 2007, Psychological science.

[33]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Genetic influences on economic preferences , 2007 .

[34]  Jerker Denrell Adaptive learning and risk taking. , 2007, Psychological review.

[35]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Kee-Lee Chou,et al.  Does mood state change risk taking tendency in older adults? , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[37]  Andrew M. Parker,et al.  Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Mário B. Ferreira,et al.  Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  M. Landy,et al.  Humans Rapidly Estimate Expected Gain in Movement Planning , 2006, Psychological science.

[40]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Multiple prospect framing and decision behavior: The mediational roles of perceived riskiness and perceived ambiguity , 2006 .

[42]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Decision by sampling , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Loss Aversion Is an Affective Forecasting Error , 2006, Psychological science.

[44]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Aging and individual differences in rapid two-choice decisions , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Michael R Dougherty,et al.  The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  J. Rieskamp,et al.  SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .

[48]  John R. Anderson,et al.  From recurrent choice to skill learning: a reinforcement-learning model. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  N. Jianakoplos,et al.  Financial Risk Taking by Age and Birth Cohort , 2006 .

[50]  Yuval Rottenstreich,et al.  Affect, Empathy, and Regressive Mispredictions of Others’ Preferences Under Risk , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[51]  P. Slovic,et al.  Affect and decision making: A hot topic , 2006 .

[52]  Yaniv Hanoch,et al.  Domain Specificity in Experimental Measures and Participant Recruitment , 2006, Psychological science.

[53]  R. Hertwig,et al.  The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. , 2006, Psychological review.

[54]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Index , 2006 .

[55]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[56]  Tobias Richter,et al.  Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Using Cognitive Models to Map Relations Between Neuropsychological Disorders and Human Decision-Making Deficits , 2005, Psychological science.

[58]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  A Comparison of Five Models that Predict Violations of First-Order Stochastic Dominance in Risky Decision Making , 2005 .

[59]  Faruk Gul,et al.  The Case for Mindless Economics , 2005 .

[60]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[61]  Timothy J. Pleskac,et al.  Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. , 2005, Psychological review.

[62]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena. , 2005, Psychological review.

[63]  I. Erev,et al.  On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. , 2005, Psychological review.

[64]  E. Higgins,et al.  Value From Regulatory Fit , 2005 .

[65]  P. Tetlock Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? , 2005 .

[66]  R. Hertwig,et al.  How forgetting aids heuristic inference. , 2005, Psychological review.

[67]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist , 2005 .

[68]  E. Weber,et al.  Communicating Asset Risk: How Name Recognition and the Format of Historic Volatility Information Affect Risk Perception and Investment Decisions , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[69]  Laura L. Carstensen,et al.  At the Intersection of Emotion and Cognition , 2005 .

[70]  E. Weber,et al.  ‘How Do I Choose Thee? Let me Count the Ways’: A Textual Analysis of Similarities and Differences in Modes of Decision-making in China and the United States , 2005, Management and Organization Review.

[71]  G. Chapman,et al.  The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? , 2005 .

[72]  E. Soane,et al.  Personality and domain‐specific risk taking , 2005 .

[73]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Resource Slack and Propensity to Discount Delayed Investments of Time Versus Money , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[74]  J. Payne It is Whether You Win or Lose: The Importance of the Overall Probabilities of Winning or Losing in Risky Choice , 2005 .

[75]  Andrew M. Parker,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/bdm.481 Decision-making Competence: External Validation through an Individual-differences Approach , 2005 .

[76]  Werner Reinartz,et al.  The Short- and Long-Term Effects of Measuring Intent to Repurchase , 2004 .

[77]  A. Dijksterhuis Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[78]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Separate Neural Systems Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary Rewards , 2004, Science.

[79]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Resource Slack and Propensity to Discount Delayed Investments of Time Versus Money , 2004 .

[80]  K. Forster,et al.  Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention. , 2004, Psychological review.

[81]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Cognitive modeling analysis of decision-making processes in cocaine abusers , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[82]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.

[83]  David R Shanks,et al.  On the role of recognition in decision making. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[84]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. , 2004, Psychological review.

[85]  J. Baron,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp Omission bias, individual differences, and normality , 2003 .

[86]  Margo Wilson,et al.  Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[87]  D. Read,et al.  Time discounting over the lifespan , 2004 .

[88]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Distinction Bias: Misprediction and Mischoice Due to Joint Evaluation , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[89]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Construction of Preferences by Constraint Satisfaction , 2022 .

[90]  E. Weber,et al.  Predicting Risk-Sensitivity in Humans and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation , 2004, Psychological review.

[91]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Arithmetic and the Brain This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited the Intraparietal Sulcus and Number Sense Number Sense in the Animal Brain , 2022 .

[92]  Francis J. Flynn,et al.  It’s the Thought That Counts: On Perceiving How Helpers Decide to Lend a Hand , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[93]  V. Reyna CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE How People Make Decisions That Involve Risk A Dual-Processes Approach , 2022 .

[94]  M. Lee,et al.  Evidence accumulation in decision making: Unifying the “take the best” and the “rational” models , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[95]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[96]  R. Thaler,et al.  Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[97]  Valerie M. Chase,et al.  How to keep children safe in traffic: find the daredevils early. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[98]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Do Defaults Save Lives? , 2006 .

[99]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Not so fast! (and not so frugal!): rethinking the recognition heuristic , 2003, Cognition.

[100]  C. González-Vallejo,et al.  Context effects: the proportional difference model and the reflection of preference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[101]  M. Dougherty,et al.  Probability judgment and subadditivity: The role of working memory capacity and constraining retrieval , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[102]  Mara Mather,et al.  Aging and Attentional Biases for Emotional Faces , 2003, Psychological science.

[103]  Jonathan D. Nelson,et al.  What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[104]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  Mood in foreign exchange trading: Cognitive processes and performance , 2003 .

[105]  T. Connolly,et al.  Omission bias in vaccination decisions: Where’s the “omission”? Where’s the “bias”? , 2003 .

[106]  A. Bröder Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox": influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[107]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[108]  Valerie F Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy‐Trace Theory, Risk Communication, and Product Labeling in Sexually Transmitted Diseases , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[109]  M. Strosberg,et al.  Presumed consent and other predictors of cadaveric organ donation in Europe. , 2003, Progress in transplantation.

[110]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication Effects Blockinof Blockinfear Blockinand Blockinanger Blockinon Blockinperceived Blockinrisks Blockinof Terrorism Blockina Blockinnational Blockinfield Blockinexperiment , 2022 .

[111]  N. Chater,et al.  Prospect relativity: how choice options influence decision under risk. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[112]  D. Ariely,et al.  “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences , 2003 .

[113]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion. , 2003 .

[114]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research: Memory, Development, and Rationality: An Integrative Theory of Judgment and Decision Making , 2003 .

[115]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research: Values, Affect, and Processes in Human Decision Making: A Differentiation and Consolidation Theory Perspective , 2003 .

[116]  J. Shanteau,et al.  Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research: List of Contributors , 2003 .

[117]  James Shanteau,et al.  Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research , 2003 .

[118]  Nick Chater,et al.  Fast, frugal, and rational: How rational norms explain behavior , 2003 .

[119]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Temporal construal. , 2003, Psychological review.

[120]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Regret in Decision Making , 2002 .

[121]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[122]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice , 2002 .

[123]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[124]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  When Web Pages Influence Choice: Effects of Visual Primes on Experts and Novices , 2002 .

[125]  A. Diederich,et al.  Survey of decision field theory , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..

[126]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. , 2002, Psychological review.

[127]  Risk perception and risk attitude in informed consent , 2002 .

[128]  I. Levin,et al.  A New Look at Framing Effects: Distribution of Effect Sizes, Individual Differences, and Independence of Types of Effects , 2002 .

[129]  B. Mellers,et al.  The Great Rationality Debate , 2002 .

[130]  C. González-Vallejo Making trade-offs: a probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior. , 2002, Psychological review.

[131]  Gregory L. Stuart,et al.  Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[132]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. , 2002, Psychological review.

[133]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. , 2002, Psychological assessment.

[134]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Maximizing Versus Satisficing : Happiness Is a Matter of Choice , 2002 .

[135]  F. Strack,et al.  The Semantics of Anchoring , 2001 .

[136]  N. Epley,et al.  Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors , 2001, Psychological science.

[137]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects? An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration , 2001, Psychological science.

[138]  J. Lerner,et al.  Fear, anger, and risk. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[139]  D. Read Is Time-Discounting Hyperbolic or Subadditive? , 2001 .

[140]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Content Effects on Decision Making. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[141]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[142]  R. Hastie Problems for judgment and decision making. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[143]  Brian Wansink,et al.  Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think , 2001 .

[144]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[145]  David Laibson,et al.  Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach , 2001 .

[146]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Joint comment on "when does duration matter in judgment and decision making?" (Ariely & Loewenstein, 2000). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[147]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Personality and risk-taking: common biosocial factors. , 2000, Journal of personality.

[148]  D. Ariely,et al.  Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and Sellers , 2000 .

[149]  Kenneth R. Hammond,et al.  Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice , 2000 .

[150]  K. Fiedler Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. , 2000, Psychological review.

[151]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[152]  N. Schwarz Emotion, cognition, and decision making , 2000 .

[153]  J. Payne,et al.  Coping with Unfavorable Attribute Values in Choice. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[154]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Predecisional Distortion of Information by Auditors and Salespersons , 2000 .

[155]  R. Luce Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches , 2000 .

[156]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[157]  I. Ritov,et al.  Emotion-based choice , 1999 .

[158]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[159]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Goal-Based Construction of Preferences: Task Goals and the Prominence Effect , 1999 .

[160]  P. Slovic Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment Battlefield , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[161]  Lola L. Lopes,et al.  The Role of Aspiration Level in Risky Choice: A Comparison of Cumulative Prospect Theory and SP/A Theory. , 1999, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[162]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[163]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction , 1999 .

[164]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[165]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Goals as Reference Points , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[166]  C. Gettys,et al.  MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. , 1999 .

[167]  N. Jianakoplos,et al.  ARE WOMEN MORE RISK AVERSE , 1998 .

[168]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception,But Cross-Cultural Similarities in Attitudes Towards Perceived Risk , 1998 .

[169]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  Experience-Weighted Attraction Learning in Coordination Games: Probability Rules, Heterogeneity, and Time-Variation. , 1998, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[170]  I. Erev,et al.  Signal detection by human observers: a cutoff reinforcement learning model of categorization decisions under uncertainty. , 1998, Psychological review.

[171]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting , 1997 .

[172]  E. Weber,et al.  Reasons for Rank-Dependent Utility Evaluation , 1997 .

[173]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self-Others Discrepancies in Risk Preference , 1997 .

[174]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[175]  A. Tversky,et al.  Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. , 1994 .

[176]  A. Damasio,et al.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex , 1994, Cognition.

[177]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[178]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[179]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[180]  M. Birnbaum Base Rates in Bayesian Inference: Signal Detection Analysis of the Cab Problem , 1983 .

[181]  H. Simon,et al.  Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought , 1978 .

[182]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .