Regional physics-based simulation of ground motion within the Rhȏne Valley, France, during the MW 4.9 2019 Le Teil earthquake

[1]  H. Jomard,et al.  Estimation of the Local Seismic Amplification on an Industrialized Site in the French Rhône Valley , 2022, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[2]  L. Bollinger,et al.  Seismic swarms in Tricastin, lower Rhône Valley (France): review of historical and instrumental seismicity and models , 2021, Comptes Rendus. Géoscience.

[3]  É. Bertrand,et al.  EMS98 intensities distribution of the “Le Teil” earthquake, France, 11 November 2019 (Mw 4.9) based on macroseismic surveys and field investigations , 2021, Comptes Rendus. Géoscience.

[4]  F. Pacor,et al.  An empirical model for the vertical‐to‐horizontal spectral ratios for Italy , 2021, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[5]  A. Deschamps,et al.  Constraining the point source parameters of the 11 November 2019 Mw 4.9 Le Teil earthquake using multiple relocation approaches, first motion and full waveform inversions , 2021, Comptes Rendus. Géoscience.

[6]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  A non-ergodic ground-motion model of Fourier amplitude spectra for France , 2021, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[7]  M. Infantino,et al.  Spatial correlation of broadband ground motions from physics‐based numerical simulations , 2021, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[8]  E. Şen,et al.  Volcanic unrest possibilities in response to recent Obruk seismic swarm on and around Hasandağ stratovolcano (Central Anatolia, Turkey) , 2021, Comptes Rendus. Géoscience.

[9]  F. Casu,et al.  Author Correction: Coincident locations of rupture nucleation during the 2019 Le Teil earthquake, France and maximum stress change from local cement quarrying , 2021, Communications Earth & Environment.

[10]  Houjun Tang,et al.  EQSIM—A multidisciplinary framework for fault-to-structure earthquake simulations on exascale computers part I: Computational models and workflow , 2020, Earthquake Spectra.

[11]  L. Baillet,et al.  Exceptional ground motion during the shallow Mw 4.9 2019 Le Teil earthquake, France , 2020, Communications Earth & Environment.

[12]  R. Paolucci,et al.  Earthquake ground motion modeling of induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field , 2020, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[13]  J. Ampuero,et al.  Comment on "Coincident locations of rupture nucleation during the 2019 Le Teil earthquake, France and maximum stress change from local cement quarrying" by De Novellis et al. , 2020 .

[14]  F. Casu,et al.  Coincident locations of rupture nucleation during the 2019 Le Teil earthquake, France and maximum stress change from local cement quarrying , 2020, Communications Earth & Environment.

[15]  P. Allemand,et al.  Rapid response to the M w 4.9 earthquake of November 11, 2019 in Le Teil, Lower Rhône Valley, France , 2020, Comptes Rendus. Géoscience.

[16]  F. Vernon,et al.  Seismic Stereometry Reveals Preparatory Behavior and Source Kinematics of Intermediate‐Size Earthquakes , 2020, Geophysical research letters.

[17]  B. Delouis,et al.  Surface rupture and shallow fault reactivation during the 2019 Mw 4.9 Le Teil earthquake, France , 2020, Communications Earth & Environment.

[18]  R. Paolucci,et al.  3D Physics-Based Numerical Simulations of Ground Motion in Istanbul from Earthquakes along the Marmara Segment of the North Anatolian Fault , 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[19]  Dino Bindi,et al.  A regionally-adaptable ground-motion model for shallow crustal earthquakes in Europe , 2020, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  M. Cara,et al.  The French seismic CATalogue (FCAT-17) , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[21]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Scenario dependence of linear site effect factors for short-period response spectral ordinates , 2017 .

[22]  Stéphane Baize,et al.  Transposing an active fault database into a seismic hazard fault model for nuclear facilities – Part 1: Building a database of potentially active faults (BDFA) for metropolitan France , 2017 .

[23]  G. Ameri,et al.  Site-specific partially nonergodic PSHA for a hard-rock critical site in southern France: adjustment of ground motion prediction equations and sensitivity analysis , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[24]  S. Gaudio,et al.  Physics-based seismic input for engineering applications: a case study in the Aterno river valley, Central Italy , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[25]  Tobias Scheffer,et al.  A Nonergodic Ground‐Motion Model for California with Spatially Varying Coefficients , 2016 .

[26]  K. Pitilakis,et al.  Aggravation factors for seismic response of sedimentary basins: A code-oriented parametric study , 2016 .

[27]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting Vertical-Component PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA from Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 2016 .

[28]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  Anatomy of strong ground motion: near-source records and three-dimensional physics-based numerical simulations of the Mw 6.0 2012 May 29 Po Plain earthquake, Italy , 2015 .

[29]  Chiara Smerzini,et al.  SPEED: SPectral Elements in Elastodynamics with Discontinuous Galerkin: a non‐conforming approach for 3D multi‐scale problems , 2013 .

[30]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  Comparison of 3D, 2D and 1D numerical approaches to predict long period earthquake ground motion in the Gubbio plain, Central Italy , 2011 .

[31]  Martin Käser,et al.  Regular versus irregular meshing for complicated models and their effect on synthetic seismograms , 2010 .

[32]  D. Boore.  Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion , 2010 .

[33]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  Near-Fault Earthquake Ground-Motion Simulation in the Grenoble Valley by a High-Performance Spectral Element Code , 2009 .

[34]  J. Bielak,et al.  A Theoretical Method for Computing Near-Fault Ground Motions in Layered Half-Spaces Considering Static Offset Due to Surface Faulting, with a Physical Interpretation of Fling Step and Rupture Directivity , 2003 .

[35]  A. Deschamps,et al.  SI-Hex: a new catalogue of instrumental seismicity for metropolitan France , 2015 .

[36]  Ralph J. Archuleta,et al.  UCSB Method for Simulation of Broadband Ground Motion from Kinematic Earthquake Sources , 2015 .

[37]  P. Renault,et al.  Importance and Impact of Host-to-Target Conversions for Ground Motion Prediction Equations in PSHA , 2012 .

[38]  John G. Anderson,et al.  QUANTITATIVE MEASURE OF THE GOODNESS-OFFIT OF SYNTHETIC SEISMOGRAMS , 2002 .

[39]  Ezio Faccioli,et al.  Complex site effects and building codes: Making the leap , 2000 .