The large volumes of point cloud data collected by a Mobile Mapping System(MMS) equipped with a laser scanner have attracted
the attention of the research community, primarily towards developing automated algorithms to help when processing this data. This
has resulted in insufficient attention being paid to quantifying the capabilities of these systems, and due to the relative youth of this
technology there is no concrete understanding of the point density that different hardware configurations and operating parameters will
exhibit on objects at specific distances. Obtaining the required point density for a project impacts on survey time, processing time, data
storage and is the underlying limit of automated algorithms. Lack of understanding of these systems makes defining point density in
project specifications a complicated process. We are in the process of developing a method for determining the quantitative resolution
of point clouds collected by a MMS with respect to known objects at specified distances. We have previously demonstrated the effect
that scanner orientation in one axis, scanner configuration and scanner operating speed have on scan profiles. We have also focused on
the effect on scan profiles of the combined vertical and horizontal rotations of the scanner (dual-axis rotations) and also incorporated
point spacing for planar surfaces at different scanner mirror speeds, pulse repetition rates and field of view as a function of range
into our model. The subject of this paper is to investigate the effect that a dual-axis scanner rotation has on profile spacing and to
design a theoretical system to calculate the angular change on profiles exhibited on horizontal and vertical surfaces for different system
configurations. The second goal of the research presented in this paper is to include in our calculations a method for incorporating
surfaces that are not parallel to the direction of travel or that are not perfectly vertical, such as walls facing away from the road or
sloped surfaces. Profile angle impacts on profile spacing and is a major factor in calculating point density on arbitrary objects, such
as road signs, poles or buildings, all important features in asset management surveys. A number of tests were designed to investigate
these issues and the results show that these tests have justified our methods, but it has been made apparent that vehicle dynamics play a
larger role than anticipated.
[1]
Fadi Dornaika,et al.
EXTRACTING B UILDING FOOTPRINTS FROM 3D POINT CLOUDS USING TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING AT STREET LEVEL
,
2009
.
[2]
Sarah Smith-Voysey,et al.
Geometric validation of a ground-based mobile laser scanning system
,
2008
.
[3]
Juha Hyyppä,et al.
Detection of Vertical Pole-Like Objects in a Road Environment Using Vehicle-Based Laser Scanning Data
,
2010,
Remote. Sens..
[4]
N. Haala,et al.
Mobile LiDAR mapping for 3D point cloud collecation in urban areas : a performance test
,
2008
.
[5]
Conor P. McElhinney,et al.
MOBILE MAPPING SYSTEM LIDAR DATA FRAMEWORK
,
2010
.
[6]
F. Goulette,et al.
An integrated on-board laser range sensing system for on-the-way city and road modelling
,
2006
.
[7]
George Vosselman,et al.
Accuracy of 3D city models: EuroSDR comparison
,
2005
.
[8]
Timothy J McCarthy,et al.
Mobile mapping system performance - an analysis of the effect of laser scanner configuration and vehicle velocity on scan profiles
,
2010
.
[9]
François Goulette,et al.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BASED ON SIMULATION FOR THE DESIGN OF LASER TERRESTRIAL MOBILE MAPPING SYSTEMS
,
2009
.
[10]
Juha Hyyppä,et al.
ROAD ENVIRONMENT MAPPING SYSTEM OF THE FINNISH GEODETIC INSTITUTE - FGI ROAMER -
,
2007
.
[11]
François Goulette,et al.
Simulation-based comparative analysis for the design of Laser Terrestrial Mobile Mapping Systems
,
2008
.
[12]
Norbert Haala,et al.
GRAMMAR SUPPORTED FACADE RECONSTRUCTION FROM MOBILE LIDAR MAPPING
,
2009
.
[13]
Claus Brenner,et al.
Quality assessment of automatically generated feature maps for future driver assistance systems
,
2009,
GIS.
[14]
Yuwei Chen,et al.
Mobile mapping system and computing methods for modelling of road environment
,
2009,
2009 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event.
[15]
Pedro Arias,et al.
Standard artifact for the geometric verification of terrestrial laser scanning systems
,
2011
.
[16]
George Vosselman,et al.
EXTRACTING WINDOWS FROM TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING
,
2007
.