Online detection and quantification of ergot bodies in cereals using near infrared hyperspectral imaging

The occurrence of ergot bodies (sclerotia of Claviceps purpurea) in cereals presents a high toxicity risk for animals and humans due to the alkaloid content. To reduce this risk, the European Commission fixed an ergot concentration limit of 0.1% in all feedstuffs containing unground cereals, and a limit of 0.05% in ‘intervention’ cereals destined for humans. This study sought to develop a procedure based on near infrared hyperspectral imaging and multivariate image analysis to detect and quantify ergot contamination in cereals. Hyperspectral images were collected using an NIR hyperspectral line scan combined with a conveyor belt. All images consisted of lines of 320 pixels that were acquired at 209 wavelength channels (1100–2400 nm). To test the procedure, several wheat samples with different levels of ergot contamination were prepared. The results showed a correlation higher than 0.99 between the predicted values obtained using chemometric tools such as partial least squares discriminant analysis or support vector machine and the reference values. For a wheat sample with a level of ergot contamination as low as 0.01 %, it was possible to identify groups of pixels detected as ergot to conclude that the sample was contaminated. In addition, no false positives were obtained with non-contaminated samples. The limit of detection was found to be 145 mg/kg and the limit of quantification 341 mg/kg. The reproducibility tests of the measurements performed over several weeks showed that the results were always within the limits allowed. Additional studies were done to optimise the parameters in terms of number of samples analysed per unit of time or conveyor belt speed. It was shown that ergot can be detected using a speed of 1–100 mm/s and that a sample of 250 g can be analysed in 1 min.

[1]  Paul Geladi Are Pixels Sample Cells? Hyperspectral Diffuse near Infrared Imaging Experiments with Pinholes , 2008 .

[2]  Pierre Dardenne,et al.  Authentication and Traceability of Agricultural and Food Products Using Vibrational Spectroscopy , 2010 .

[3]  Volker Thomsen,et al.  Limits of Detection in Spectroscopy , 2003 .

[4]  J. Kybal,et al.  Ergot alkaloids , 2008, Folia Microbiologica.

[5]  Vincent Baeten,et al.  Applications of Near‐infrared Imaging for Monitoring Agricultural Food and Feed Products , 2007 .

[6]  M. A. Jonker,et al.  Worldwide regulations for mycotoxins in food and feed in 2003 , 2004 .

[7]  D. Massart,et al.  Looking for natural patterns in data: Part 1. Density-based approach , 2001 .

[8]  Geoffrey Brown Undesirable substances in animal feed , 2014 .

[9]  José Manuel Amigo,et al.  Study of pharmaceutical samples by NIR chemical-image and multivariate analysis , 2008 .

[10]  J. Pierna,et al.  NIR Hyperspectral Imaging Methods for Quality and Safety Control of Food and Feed Products: Contributions to Four European Projects , 2010 .

[11]  J. Pierna,et al.  Hyperspectral Imaging Techniques: an Attractive Solution for the Analysis of Biological and Agricultural Materials , 2007 .

[12]  R. Krska,et al.  Significance, chemistry and determination of ergot alkaloids: A review , 2008, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[13]  P. Scott Ergot alkaloids: extent of human and animal exposure , 2009 .

[14]  Vincent Baeten,et al.  Combination of support vector machines (SVM) and near‐infrared (NIR) imaging spectroscopy for the detection of meat and bone meal (MBM) in compound feeds , 2004 .

[15]  J.G.J. Mol,et al.  Contaminants in Food and Feed: Inexpensive Detection for Control of Exposure (CONffIDENCE) , 2009 .