Using business-process simulation within a business-process reengineering approach

This paper presents a case study of the use of business-process simulation within the context of a business-process-reengineering approach to change. The process-based change methodology provides context to the simulation technique in that it connects the aims of a business-process simulation (BPS) study to the strategic aims of the organisation and incorporates a consideration of human factors in order to achieve successful implementation of redesigned processes. Conversely, the ability of BPS to incorporate system variability, scenario analysis and a visual display to communicate process performance makes it a useful technique to provide a realistic assessment of the need for, and results of, change.

[1]  Daniel T. Brunner,et al.  Inside simulation software: how it works and why it matters: inside discrete-event simulation software: how it works and why it matters , 2002, WSC '02.

[2]  Mohsen M. Fathee,et al.  The effects of complexity on business processes reengineering: values and limitations of modeling and simulation technologies , 1998, 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).

[3]  M. Aguilar,et al.  Business process simulation: a fundamental step supporting process centered management , 1999, WSC'99. 1999 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings. 'Simulation - A Bridge to the Future' (Cat. No.99CH37038).

[4]  Sharon Johnson,et al.  Applying the axiomatic approach to business process redesign , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[5]  Jay Bal,et al.  Process analysis techniques and tools for business improvements , 1998, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[6]  S Robinson Medal awards 2000 , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  A. Levas,et al.  Panel discussion on the role of modeling and simulation in business process reengineering , 1995, Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings, 1995..

[8]  Rohit Verma,et al.  Redesigning check-processing operations using animated computer simulation , 2000, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[9]  Stephen Campbell,et al.  New developments in re‐engineering organizations , 1997 .

[10]  A. Akin Aksu,et al.  Re-engineering revisited: a simulation approach , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[11]  Alan Harrison,et al.  Investigating business processes: does process simplification always work? , 1998, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[12]  Randall P. Sadowski,et al.  Simulation with Arena , 1998 .

[13]  David A. Buchanan,et al.  Representing process: the contribution of a re‐engineering frame , 1998 .

[14]  Andrew Greasley,et al.  Using simulation modelling for BPR: resource allocation in a police custody process , 1998 .

[15]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Decision-makers' perceptions of the value and impact of visual interactive modelling , 1999 .

[16]  Vlatka Hlupic Discrete-Event Simulation Software: What the Users Want , 1999, Simul..

[17]  B. Nordgren THE PROBLEM WITH WAITING TIMES , 1999 .

[18]  Vlatka Hlupic,et al.  Successful Simulation: A Practical Approach to Simulation Projects , 1995 .

[19]  David Profozich,et al.  Managing Change with Business Process Simulation , 1997 .

[20]  Anthony Levas Panel discussion on the role of modeling and simulation in business process reengineering , 1995, WSC '95.

[21]  Kerim Tumay,et al.  Simulation modeling methods , 2000 .

[22]  J. Peppard,et al.  The Essence of Business Process Re-Engineering , 1995 .

[23]  Andrew Greasley Costing police custody operations , 2001 .

[24]  T. J. Schriber,et al.  Inside simulation software: how it works and why it matters , 1996, Proceedings Winter Simulation Conference.

[25]  Marc Aguilar,et al.  Business process simulation: a fundamental step supporting process centered management , 1999, WSC '99.

[26]  Stewart Robinson,et al.  Soft with a hard centre: discrete-event simulation in facilitation , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..