On the Syntax of Prepositional Phrases

(2007) in Spath, A. (ed.) Interface and Interface Conditions. Berlin. de Gruyter. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABSTRACT The standard view about the uniformity of Case assignment by verbs and prepositions is challenged with data from German and an analysis according to which P has a feature structure which involves a Case feature that may not only participate in Case checking but may supply the Case that is missing in the complement of P. Adopting a probe/goal relation of agreement a fair number of peculiarities of the syntax of PPs can be explained such as obligatory pied piping, semantic selection, copy movement, operator scope and the role of adverbial proforms in pronominal PPs. Finally, the asymmetry in Case assignment between V and P is supported by novel data from sentence processing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1]  青木 昌吉.  Deutsche Grammatik = 獨逸小文典 , 1921 .

[2]  Helmut Weiß,et al.  A Quantifier Approach to Negation in Natural Languages , 2002, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[3]  Josef Bayer,et al.  Case and Linking in Language Comprehension: Evidence from German , 2006 .

[4]  J. Hopf,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials and Case Information in Syntactic Ambiguities , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Peter Gallmann,et al.  Die Steuerung der Flexion in der DP , 1996 .

[6]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[7]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Partial Movement Constructions, Pied Piping, and Higher Order Choice Functions , 2002 .

[8]  Hilda Koopman,et al.  Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles: the structure of Dutch PPs , 2003 .

[9]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[10]  Josef Bayer,et al.  Morphological underspecification meets oblique case : syntactic and processing effects in German , 2001 .

[11]  J. Zwart.  The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[12]  Jochen Zeller,et al.  Lexical particles, semi-lexical postpositions , 2001 .

[13]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Wh-Scope Marking , 2000 .

[14]  H. V. Riemsdijk.  Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections , 1998 .

[15]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Against LF Pied-Piping , 1996 .

[16]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[17]  Markus Steinbach,et al.  On The (Absence Of A) Base Position For Dative Objects In German , 1995 .

[18]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[19]  David Lewis,et al.  Formal semantics of Natural Language: Adverbs of quantification , 2008 .

[20]  Henk C. van Riemsdijk,et al.  A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases , 1978 .

[21]  James Mccloskey,et al.  On the syntax of person-number inflection in modern Irish , 1984, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

[22]  K. Hale,et al.  Ken Hale: A Life in Language , 2001 .

[23]  Dana Mcdaniel.  Partial and multiple Wh-movement , 1989 .

[24]  J. Bayer,et al.  Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-situ , 1995 .

[25]  Minimale Annahmen in Syntax und Morphologie , 2002 .