An Experimental Study of Haptic Feedback in a Teleoperated Assembly Task

Haptic feedback is known to improve teleoperation task performance for a number of tasks, and one important question is which haptic cues are the most important for each specific task. This research quantifies human performance in an assembly task for two types of haptic cues: low-frequency (LF) force feedback and high-frequency (HF) force feedback. A human subjects study was performed with those two main factors: LF force feedback on/off and HF force (acceleration) feedback on/off. All experiments were performed using a three degree-of-freedom teleoperator where the slave device has a low intrinsic stiffness, while the master device on the other hand is stiff. The results show that the LF haptic feedback reduces impact forces, but does not influence low-frequency contact forces or task completion time. The HF information did not improve task performance, but did reduce the mental load of the teleoperator, but only in combination with the LF feedback.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[2]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Tactile Display of Vibratory Information in Teleoperation and Virtual Environments , 1995, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Improving contact realism through event-based haptic feedback , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[4]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[6]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Performance evaluation of a six-axis generalized force-reflecting teleoperator , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  The Low-Stiffness Teleoperator Slave — a Trade-off between Stability and Performance , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Tactile Display of High-Frequency Information in Teleoperation and Virtual Environments. , 1995 .

[10]  R H LaMotte,et al.  Softness discrimination with a tool. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  'Toy problem' as the benchmark test for teleoperation systems , 2003, Adv. Robotics.

[12]  M. Goldfarb,et al.  The effect of virtual surface stiffness on the haptic perception of detail , 2004, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[13]  Jerry Pratt,et al.  Series elastic actuators for high fidelity force control , 2002 .

[14]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Isotropy and actuator optimization in haptic interface design , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[15]  Ying Tang,et al.  Size discrimination in haptic teleoperation - influence of teleoperator stiffness , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..