Five Factor Model in Iranian Culture: A Psychometrics Analysis of NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)

This study aimed to investigate the construct validity and factor structure of NEO-Five Factor Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1992) in Iranian population. Participants were 1639 (780 male, 859 female) Tehran people aged 15-71. The results of explanatory factor analysis showed no notable differences between the factor structures extracted by oblique and orthogonal rotations and didn‟t replicate the scoring key. The Openness and Agreeableness had more psychometric problems (low internal consistency and high deleted items). The female‟s NEO-FFI factor structure (with 41 items of60 loaded on intended factors)was clearer than males‟ (with 37 items). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the male‟s latent modeling of the 31-item but failed to fit the female‟s model. The women scored significantly higher in the Neuroticism, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness than men who scored significantly higher in the Extraversion. As previous findings, the current results showed the NEO-FFI‟s cultural limitations assessing the universality of the Five Factor Model.

[1]  P. Costa,et al.  A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory , 2004 .

[2]  W. Hofstee.  Structures of Personality Traits , 2003 .

[3]  A. Snell,et al.  Efficient Assessment of the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Structural Validity Analyses of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (Form S). , 1999 .

[4]  G. Becker.  NEO-FFI scores in college men and women: A view from McDonald’s unified treatment of test theory , 2006 .

[5]  J. Block.  A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  A. S. Levine.  Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study. , 1952 .

[7]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[8]  P. Costa,et al.  NEO inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) : professional manual , 2010 .

[9]  I. Deary,et al.  The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E , 2000 .

[10]  Bart Cambré,et al.  Adjustment for Acquiescence in the Assessment of the Construct Equivalence of Likert-Type Score Items , 2003 .

[11]  Psychometric Properties of a Korean Version of the Revised Neo-Personality Inventory , 1998 .

[12]  Bernadette N Setiadi,et al.  Ongoing themes in psychology and culture , 2004 .

[13]  P. Costa,et al.  Rotation to Maximize the Construct Validity of Factors in the NEO Personality Inventory. , 1989, Multivariate behavioral research.

[14]  David C. Funder,et al.  Lay Conceptions of the Five-Factor Model and its Indicators , 1998 .

[15]  H. Triandis,et al.  Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology , 1985 .

[16]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[17]  J. Rollnik,et al.  Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO-FFI in psychosomatic outpatients , 2001 .

[18]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[19]  Constantinos M. Kokkinos,et al.  Searching for the ''Big Five'' in a Greek context: the NEO-FFI under the microscope , 2004 .

[20]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[21]  Ronald R. Holden,et al.  The NEO five-factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women , 1994 .

[22]  I. Deary,et al.  Models of job-related stress and personal achievement among consultant doctors. , 1996, British journal of psychology.

[23]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Descriptive consistency and social desirability in self‐and peer reports , 1989 .

[24]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Four ways five factors are not basic , 1992 .

[25]  C. Sneed,et al.  Reliability and Factor Structure of the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory for Australian Adolescents , 2002 .

[26]  B. Fink,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratio and the 'big five' personality factors , 2004 .

[27]  T. Singelis,et al.  Metric Equivalence of the Bidimensional Acculturation Scale, the Satisfaction With Life Scale, and the Self-Construal Scale Across Spanish and English Language Versions , 2006 .

[28]  L. R. Goldberg.  The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[29]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[30]  H. Stumpf,et al.  A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments , 1998 .

[31]  Peter Borkenau,et al.  Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the 5-factor model of personality , 1990 .

[32]  J. Rossier,et al.  Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples , 2005 .

[33]  F.J.R. van de Vijver,et al.  Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research , 1997 .

[34]  R. McCrae,et al.  Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture , 2004 .

[35]  John P. Donnelly,et al.  Big Five or Big Two? Superordinate factors in the NEO Five Factor Inventory and the Antisocial Personality Questionnaire , 2004 .

[36]  E. Ferguson,et al.  The five factor model of personality: Openness a distinct but related construct , 1998 .

[37]  M. Hřebíčková,et al.  The NEO Five-factor Inventory in Czech, Polish, and Slovak contexts , 2002 .

[38]  Gilles E. Gignac,et al.  Implications relevant to CFA model misfit, reliability, and the five-factor model as measured by the NEO-FFI , 2007 .

[39]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Quartic rotation criteria and algorithms , 1988 .

[40]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q‐Set and the five‐factor model , 1986 .

[41]  J. M. Digman.  Higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  G. Saucier.  Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. , 1994, Journal of personality assessment.

[43]  Eric D. Heggestad,et al.  Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  J. Derksen,et al.  Development of the Revised-Neo Personality Inventory for Indonesia: A Preliminary Study , 2004 .

[45]  John W. Berry,et al.  Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. , 1989 .

[46]  H. Stumpf,et al.  A psychometric examination of the French translations of the NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI. , 1998 .

[47]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Adjective Check List Scales and the Five-Factor Model , 1991 .

[48]  A. T. Church,et al.  Identifying Cultural Differences in Items and Traits , 1997 .

[49]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[50]  K. Yoshimura,et al.  Validation of the Japanese Version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a Large Community Sample , 2001, Psychological reports.