Politics of Hazard Mitigation

The formulation, adoption, and implementation of mitigation measures is an intensely political process that hazards professionals need to understand if they are to be effective in reducing community hazard vulnerability. We describe the process by which either focusing events such as disasters, or policy entrepreneurs such as involved professionals, can frame hazard mitigation as a salient issue on the community agenda. In addition, we discuss the demands of policy formulation, particularly the importance of mobilizing a constituency for hazard mitigation among affected stakeholders in the community. Finally, we conclude by showing how a widely used model of policy implementation reveals critical features that community hazard mitigation policies must have if they are to be implemented successfully by administrative bureaucracies.

[1]  Peter J. May,et al.  Disaster Policy Implementation , 1986, Disaster Research in Practice.

[2]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Flood Plain Land-use Management: A National Assessment , 1985 .

[3]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Adoption and Implementation of Hazard Adjustments , 1997 .

[4]  Carl E. Van Horn,et al.  The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework , 1975 .

[5]  P. May.  Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles , 1993 .

[6]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Household Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments: A Comparison of Residents in Two States , 2000, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[7]  Michael K. Lindell.  Are Local Emergency Planning Committees Effective in Developing Community Disaster Preparedness , 1994 .

[8]  H. Gans.  Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time , 1979 .

[9]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  A Social Stage Model of Collective Coping: The Loma Prieta Earthquake and The Persian Gulf War , 1993 .

[10]  M. Goggin,et al.  Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[11]  B. Wood.  Modeling Federal Implementation as a System: The Clean Air Case , 1992 .

[12]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Planning Effectiveness: Effectiveness of Community Planning for Toxic Chemical Emergencies , 1994 .

[13]  T. Birkland.  After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events , 1997 .

[14]  P. Bachrach,et al.  Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework , 1963, American Political Science Review.

[15]  J. E. Anderson.  Public Policymaking: An Introduction , 1975 .

[16]  B. Wood.  Federalism and Policy Responsiveness: The Clean Air Case , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[17]  F. Baumgartner.  Conflict and rhetoric in French policymaking , 1989 .

[18]  T. Beatley,et al.  Planning for Earthquakes: Risk, Politics, and Policy , 1992 .

[19]  M. Lindell,et al.  Planning for Uncertainty: The Case of local Disaster Planning , 1987 .

[20]  Peter J. May,et al.  Disaster Policy Implementation: Managing Programs Under Shared Governance , 1986 .

[21]  H. Glick.  The Right to Die: Policy Innovation and Its Consequences , 1992 .

[22]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Cooperating with nature : confronting natural hazards with land use planning for sustainable communities , 1998 .

[23]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  Implementation and public policy , 1983 .

[24]  Burton Al.  The environment as hazard , 1978 .

[25]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Principles for Managing Community Relocation as a Hazard Mitigation Measure , 1997 .

[26]  M. Lindell,et al.  Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazard , 2000 .

[27]  Richard Stuart Olson,et al.  THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LIFE‐SAFETY: THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND “HAZARDOUS‐STRUCTURE ABATEMENT,” 1973–1981 , 1985 .

[28]  D. Palumbo,et al.  Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening Up the Black Box , 1990 .

[29]  A Lavell,et al.  Opening a Policy Window: The Costa Rican Hospital Retrofit and Seismic Insurance Programs 1986–1992 , 1994, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[30]  Analyzing Mandate Design: State Mandates Governing Hazard-Prone Areas , 1994 .

[31]  Rs Olson,et al.  Trapped in Politics: The Life, Death and Afterlife of the Utah Seismic Safety Advisory Council , 1994 .

[32]  John W. Kingdon,et al.  Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. , 1985 .

[33]  Rs Olson,et al.  'The Rubble's Standing Up' in Oroville, California: The Politics of Building Safety , 1993 .

[34]  R. Cobb,et al.  The politics of problem definition : shaping the policy agenda , 1994 .

[35]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[36]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Coping With Floods: The Land Use Management Paradox , 1981 .

[37]  Robert A. Olson,et al.  Night and Day: Mitigation Policymaking in Oakland, California, Before and After the Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1998 .