A microfluidic pipette array for mechanophenotyping of cancer cells and mechanical gating of mechanosensitive channels.

Micropipette aspiration measures the mechanical properties of single cells. A traditional micropipette aspiration system requires a bulky infrastructure and has a low throughput and limited potential for automation. We have developed a simple microfluidic device which is able to trap and apply pressure to single cells in designated aspiration arrays. By changing the volume flow rate using a syringe pump, we can accurately exert a pressure difference across the trapped cells for pipette aspiration. By examining cell deformation and protrusion length into the pipette under an optical microscope, several important cell mechanical properties, such as the cortical tension and the Young's modulus, can be measured quantitatively using automated image analysis. Using the microfluidic pipette array, the stiffness of breast cancer cells and healthy breast epithelial cells was measured and compared. Finally, we applied our device to examine the gating threshold of the mechanosensitive channel MscL expressed in mammalian cells. Together, the development of a microfluidic pipette array could enable rapid mechanophenotyping of individual cells and for mechanotransduction studies.

[1]  Shoji Takeuchi,et al.  A trap-and-release integrated microfluidic system for dynamic microarray applications , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms of Cellular Mechanosensing , 2013, Nature materials.

[3]  Ho Cheung Shum,et al.  Syringe-pump-induced fluctuation in all-aqueous microfluidic system implications for flow rate accuracy. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[4]  Daniel A Fletcher,et al.  Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  S. Quake,et al.  Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. , 2000, Science.

[6]  Christine Unger,et al.  In vitro cell migration and invasion assays. , 2013, Mutation research.

[7]  Kuo-Kang Liu,et al.  Optical tweezers for single cells , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  Frederick Sachs,et al.  Energetic and Spatial Parameters for Gating of the Bacterial Large Conductance Mechanosensitive Channel, MscL , 1999, The Journal of general physiology.

[9]  David Erickson,et al.  A serial micropipette microfluidic device with applications to cancer cell repeated deformation studies. , 2013, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[10]  D. Ingber,et al.  Probing transmembrane mechanical coupling and cytomechanics using magnetic twisting cytometry. , 1995, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[11]  Steven M. Block,et al.  Making light work with optical tweezers , 1992, Nature.

[12]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Pinched-flow hydrodynamic stretching of single-cells. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[13]  Changhuei Yang,et al.  A high-efficiency microfluidic device for size-selective trapping and sorting. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[14]  David Erickson,et al.  Elucidating mechanical transition effects of invading cancer cells with a subnucleus-scaled microfluidic serial dimensional modulation device. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[15]  Hongshen Ma,et al.  Microfluidic micropipette aspiration for measuring the deformability of single cells. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[16]  C Kung,et al.  Hydrophilicity of a single residue within MscL correlates with increased channel mechanosensitivity. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Mechanosensitive channels: what can they do and how do they do it? , 2011, Structure.

[18]  Xudong Fan,et al.  Optofluidic Microsystems for Chemical and Biological Analysis. , 2011, Nature photonics.

[19]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Water Permeation Drives Tumor Cell Migration in Confined Microenvironments , 2014, Cell.

[20]  R M Nerem,et al.  The application of a homogeneous half-space model in the analysis of endothelial cell micropipette measurements. , 1988, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  E. Schmelz,et al.  Evaluation of the influence of growth medium composition on cell elasticity. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  Microfluidics-based assessment of cell deformability. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  Daniel A Fletcher,et al.  Analyzing cell mechanics in hematologic diseases with microfluidic biophysical flow cytometry. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[24]  D. Chen,et al.  Parameter Screening in Microfluidics Based Hydrodynamic Single-Cell Trapping , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[25]  D. Psaltis,et al.  Developing optofluidic technology through the fusion of microfluidics and optics , 2006, Nature.

[26]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  H. Gong,et al.  The effect of the endothelial cell cortex on atomic force microscopy measurements. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Daniel T Chiu,et al.  A microfluidic model for single-cell capillary obstruction by Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Jaume Casademunt,et al.  Dynamical organization of the cytoskeletal cortex probed by micropipette aspiration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Chang Lu,et al.  Microfluidic electroporative flow cytometry for studying single-cell biomechanics. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  Traction force microscopy on-chip: shear deformation of fibroblast cells. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[33]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells , 2007 .

[34]  C. Kung,et al.  Feeling the hidden mechanical forces in lipid bilayer is an original sense , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  S. Suresh,et al.  Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials , 2003, Nature materials.

[36]  Richard Superfine,et al.  Mechanical stiffness grades metastatic potential in patient tumor cells and in cancer cell lines. , 2011, Cancer research.

[37]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  Nathan Cermak,et al.  Characterizing deformability and surface friction of cancer cells , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  C. Lim,et al.  Deformability study of breast cancer cells using microfluidics , 2009, Biomedical microdevices.

[40]  A. Valero,et al.  Optimization of microfluidic single cell trapping for long-term on-chip culture. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[41]  Yu Sun,et al.  Automated Micropipette Aspiration of Single Cells , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  N. Yuldasheva,et al.  Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force , 2014, Nature.

[43]  J. Tinevez,et al.  Role of cortical tension in bleb growth , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Hongshen Ma,et al.  Microfluidic analysis of cellular deformability of normal and oxidatively damaged red blood cells , 2013, American journal of hematology.

[45]  Shu Chien,et al.  Piezo1, a mechanically activated ion channel, is required for vascular development in mice , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Cheri X Deng,et al.  Activation of a Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channel in Mammalian Cells by Cytoskeletal Stress , 2014, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[47]  Hongshen Ma,et al.  Microfluidic biomechanical assay for red blood cells parasitized by Plasmodium falciparum. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[48]  Byungkyu Kim,et al.  Cell Stiffness Is a Biomarker of the Metastatic Potential of Ovarian Cancer Cells , 2012, PloS one.