Prevention from Sharp Injuries in the Hospital Sector: An Italian National Observatory on the Implementation of the Council Directive 2010/32/EU before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Sharp injuries, determining the risk of bloodborne infections and psychological distress in healthcare workers, may be prevented by a set of strategies, legally enforced in Europe through the Directive 2010/32/EU. To assess its level of implementation in Italy, a national survey was conducted in 2017 and again in 2021, evaluating the progress and possible drawbacks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Altogether, 285 safety managers and 330 nurses from a representative sample of 97 and 117 public hospitals were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire. Knowledge of the Directive requirements decreased significantly, with <60% of participants answering correctly in 2021, and nurses’ attendance in specific courses dropped to 25% in 2021 compared to 54% in 2017. Over 75% of hospitals introduced multiple safety-engineered devices (SED), though total replacement occurred in <50% of cases; routine SED availability increased for blood collection (89%) and venous access devices (83%). Incorrect behaviors in handling sharps decreased significantly over time. Nurses’ HBV vaccination coverage was high (89% in both surveys); in the last year, 97% were vaccinated against COVID, and 47% against influenza. Average annual injuries per hospital did not increase significantly (32 in 2021 vs. 26 in 2017). In 2017, nurses’ perceived safety barriers were working in emergency situations (49%) and lack of resources (40%); in 2021, understaffing (73%), physical fatigue (62%), and handling difficulties while wearing full protective equipment (59%). Safety measures were implemented in Italian hospitals, and although the average injuries per hospital did not show a decrease, these measures could have helped protect healthcare workers during the pandemic, mitigating its potential impact on the increase in situations at risk of injury.

[1]  L. Benzakour,et al.  How things changed during the COVID-19 pandemic’s first year: A longitudinal, mixed-methods study of organisational resilience processes among healthcare workers , 2022, Safety Science.

[2]  Joaquim Góis,et al.  Underreporting of work accidents associated with blood-borne risk factors. , 2022, La Medicina del lavoro.

[3]  V. Dimonte,et al.  The first COVID-19 new graduate nurses generation: findings from an Italian cross-sectional study , 2022, BMC Nursing.

[4]  Danya E. Keene,et al.  Stressors on frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a focus on moral injury and implications for the future , 2022, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health.

[5]  O. Kaya,et al.  What were the changes during the COVID-19 pandemic era concerning occupational risks among health care workers? , 2021, Journal of Infection and Public Health.

[6]  E. d’Aloja,et al.  COVID-19 and Italian Healthcare Workers From the Initial Sacrifice to the mRNA Vaccine: Pandemic Chrono-History, Epidemiological Data, Ethical Dilemmas, and Future Challenges , 2021, Frontiers in Public Health.

[7]  N. Koudas,et al.  Astrid , 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment.

[8]  A. Nienhaus,et al.  Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  James Stanford The Hub , 2019 .

[10]  P. Argentero,et al.  Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy—comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices , 2019, BMJ Open.

[11]  D. Kriebel,et al.  Prevention of Needle-Stick Injuries in Healthcare Facilities: A Meta-Analysis , 2015, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[12]  Alexander Alonso Cementing Sharps Safety in the European Union: The Importance of Complyingwith the 2010 EU Council Directive on Sharps Injury Prevention , 2014 .

[13]  A. Coelho,et al.  Age and years in practice as factors associated with needlestick and sharps injuries among health care workers in a Portuguese hospital. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  M. Conaway,et al.  Percutaneous injuries before and after the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  F. L’hériteau,et al.  Needlestick Injury Rates According to Different Types of Safety-Engineered Devices: Results of a French Multicenter Study , 2010, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[16]  E. Bouvet,et al.  Role of Safety-Engineered Devices in Preventing Needlestick Injuries in 32 French Hospitals , 2007, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[17]  C. Paterson,et al.  Sharps injuries in UK health care: a review of injury rates, viral transmission and potential efficacy of safety devices. , 2006, Occupational medicine.

[18]  J. Bagg,et al.  Potential for reported needlestick injury prevention among healthcare workers through safety device usage and improvement of guideline adherence: expert panel assessment. , 2006, The Journal of hospital infection.

[19]  K. Sepkowitz,et al.  Efficacy of safety-engineered device implementation in the prevention of percutaneous injuries: a review of published studies. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[20]  M. Jaakkola,et al.  Needle stick injuries among nurses in sub‐Saharan Africa , 2005, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[21]  Sean P Clarke,et al.  Organizational climate, staffing, and safety equipment as predictors of needlestick injuries and near-misses in hospital nurses. , 2002, American journal of infection control.

[22]  G. Ippolito,et al.  Risk of Exposure to Bloodborne Infection for Italian Healthcare Workers, by Job Category and Work Area , 2001, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[23]  G. Chandy,et al.  Impact of introduction of sharps containers and of education programmes on the pattern of needle stick injuries in a tertiary care centre in India. , 2001, The Journal of hospital infection.

[24]  L R Murphy,et al.  Hospital safety climate and its relationship with safe work practices and workplace exposure incidents. , 2000, American journal of infection control.

[25]  G. Ippolito,et al.  Surveillance of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens in health care workers: the Italian national programme. , 1999, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[26]  D. Cardo,et al.  A Case-Control Study of HIV Seroconversion in Health Care Workers After Percutaneous Exposure , 1998 .

[27]  D. Cardo,et al.  A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Needlestick Surveillance Group. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  K. Clemons,et al.  Percutaneous Injury Analysis: Consistent Categorization, Effective Reduction Methods, and Future Strategies , 1995, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[29]  G. Ippolito,et al.  Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers. , 1994, JAMA.

[30]  D. Vlahov,et al.  Temporal association between implementation of universal precautions and a sustained, progressive decrease in percutaneous exposures to blood. , 1994, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[31]  G. Pugliese Canada Adopts Nationwide Needlestick Surveillance System-EPINet , 1993, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[32]  G. Ippolito,et al.  The Risk of Occupational Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Health Care Workers: Italian Multicenter Study , 1993 .

[33]  G. Ippolito,et al.  The risk of occupational human immunodeficiency virus infection in health care workers. Italian Multicenter Study. The Italian Study Group on Occupational Risk of HIV infection. , 1993, Archives of internal medicine.

[34]  D. Stevens,et al.  A Five-Year Study of Needlestick Injuries: Significant Reduction Associated With Communication, Education, and Convenient Placement of Sharps Containers , 1992, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[35]  C. Linnemann,et al.  Effect of Educational Programs, Rigid Sharps Containers, and Universal Precautions on Reported Needlestick Injuries in Healthcare Workers , 1991, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[36]  H. Lane,et al.  Risk for occupational transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) associated with clinical exposures. A prospective evaluation. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[37]  R. Pearson,et al.  Rates of needle-stick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  J. Verbeek,et al.  Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[39]  K. A. Al-Turki,et al.  Some epidemiological aspects of needle stick injuries among the hospital health care workers: Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[40]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[41]  Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health-care settings. , 1988, Canadian journal of medical technology.