Simpler completeness proofs for modal logics with intersection

There has been a significant interest in extending various modal logics with intersection, the most prominent examples being epistemic and doxastic logics with distributed knowledge. Completeness proofs for such logics tend to be complicated, in particular on model classes such as S5 like in standard epistemic logic, mainly due to the undefinability of intersection of modalities in standard modal logics. A standard proof method for the S5 case was outlined in [8] and later explicated in more detail in [13], using an "unraveling-folding method" case to achieve a treelike model to deal with the problem of undefinability. This method, however, is not easily adapted to other logics, due to the level of detail and reliance on S5. In this paper we propose a simpler proof technique by building a treelike canonical model directly, which avoids the complications in the processes of unraveling and folding. We demonstrate the technique by showing completeness of the normal modal logics K, D, T, B, S4 and S5 extended with intersection modalities. Furthermore, these treelike canonical models are compatible with Fischer-Ladner-style closures, and we combine the methods to show the completeness of the mentioned logics further extended with transitive closure of union modalities known from PDL or epistemic logic. Some of these completeness results are new.

[1]  Henrik Sahlqvist Completeness and Correspondence in the First and Second Order Semantics for Modal Logic , 1975 .

[2]  Brian F. Chellas Modal Logic: Normal systems of modal logic , 1980 .

[3]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  A Guide to Completeness and Complexity for Modal Logics of Knowledge and Belief , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[4]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  Making Some Issues of Implicit Knowledge Explicit , 1992, Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci..

[5]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  What can machines know?: On the properties of knowledge in distributed systems , 1992, JACM.

[6]  W. van der Hoek,et al.  Epistemic logic for AI and computer science , 1995, Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science.

[7]  Philippe Balbiani,et al.  Axiomatization of Logics Based on Kripke Models with Relative Accessibility Relations , 1998 .

[8]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Modal Logic , 2001, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science.

[9]  Jerzy Tiuryn,et al.  Dynamic logic , 2001, SIGA.

[10]  Dimiter Vakarelov,et al.  PDL with intersection of programs: a complete axiomatization , 2003, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[11]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[12]  Yì N. Wáng,et al.  Public announcement logic with distributed knowledge: expressivity, completeness and complexity , 2013, Synthese.

[13]  N. Alechina,et al.  Embedding Coalition Logic in the Minimal Normal Multimodal Logic with Intersection , 2015 .

[14]  Yì N. Wáng,et al.  Relativized common knowledge for dynamic epistemic logic , 2015, J. Appl. Log..

[15]  D. Nardi,et al.  An Introduction to Description Logic , 2017 .

[16]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  An Introduction to Description Logic , 2017 .

[17]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  An Introduction to Description Logic by Franz Baader , 2017 .

[18]  Thomas Ågotnes,et al.  Group Belief , 2020, CLAR.