A new integrated decision-making approach for design alternative selection for supporting complex product development

Design alternative selection is regarded as a crucial activity in complex product development. The traditional decision-making methods barely consider the design alternative evaluation of complex products or integrate the voices of customers into the decision process systematically. The aim of this paper is to improve the effectiveness of decision making about multiple design alternatives in complex product development under uncertainty. Based on the integration of quality function deployment and group decision making, a new decision-making approach is proposed for assisting product designers in selecting the design alternatives of complex products. Meanwhile, fuzzy set theory is incorporated in order to capture the vagueness and uncertainty that exists in the decision process. In this study, a complex product is divided into multi-parts to form a hierarchical structure. Fuzzy quality function deployment is used for translating customer requirements into the priorities of these parts. Furthermore, a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making method is employed for evaluating the performance of part alternatives. All design alternatives are ranked and then selected according to the multiplied evaluation scores of parts with their weights. This proposed approach is applied in a real-world example of a horizontal directional drilling machine. In addition, how the importance weights of customer requirements and evaluation criteria change are analysed under various risk environments.

[1]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment , 2002, J. Intell. Manuf..

[2]  Nunzia Carbonara,et al.  Cognitive maps to analyze new product development processes: A case study , 2006 .

[3]  Hsing Hung Chen,et al.  Prioritization and operations NPD mix in a network with strategic partners under uncertainty , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  R. Calantone,et al.  Are Really New Product Development Projects Harder to Shut Down , 1998 .

[5]  Maria Anna Polak,et al.  Theoretical model for calculating pulling loads for pipes in horizontal directional drilling , 2007 .

[6]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[7]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1989 .

[8]  G. Tonkay,et al.  Application of modified fuzzy ahp method to analyze bolting sequence of structural joints , 1995 .

[9]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators , 1996, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[10]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  An evaluation model of new product launch strategy , 2006 .

[11]  Wei Yan,et al.  Product concept generation and selection using sorting technique and fuzzy c-means algorithm , 2006, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[12]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The Voice of the Customer , 1993 .

[13]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Evaluation and selection in product design for mass customization: A knowledge decision support approach , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[15]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 2004, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[16]  M. Lu,et al.  Integrating QFD, AHP and Benchmarking in Strategic Marketing , 1994 .

[17]  A. Akgunduz,et al.  Evaluation of sub-component alternatives in product design processes , 2002 .

[18]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  Evaluation of alternatives for product customization using fuzzy logic , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[19]  Da Ruan,et al.  Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment , 2007, Comput. Ind..

[20]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Modelling design processes: a conceptual, decision-based perspective , 1995 .

[21]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A new approach based on soft computing to accelerate the selection of new product ideas , 2004, Comput. Ind..

[22]  C K Kwong,et al.  Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach , 2003 .

[23]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom , 2005 .

[24]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Gloria Pérez,et al.  On the product selection and plant dimensioning problem under uncertainty , 2005 .

[26]  Bo K. Wong,et al.  Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Pin-Yu Chu,et al.  A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection☆ , 2008 .

[28]  A. Kaufmann,et al.  Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : theory and applications , 1986 .

[29]  G. Facchinetti,et al.  Note on ranking fuzzy triangular numbers , 1998 .

[30]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  Factors which influence decision making in new product evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Glenn H. Mazur,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT ( QFD ) TO DESIGN A COURSE IN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT ( TQM ) AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING , 1997 .

[32]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model , 2002 .

[33]  Yiliu Tu,et al.  Rapid one-of-a-kind product development , 2006 .

[34]  R. Sterling,et al.  Stability analysis of a borehole wall during horizontal directional drilling , 2007 .

[35]  Jason S. Lueke,et al.  Numerical Characterization of Surface Heave Associated with Horizontal Directional Drilling , 2006 .

[36]  George L. Vairaktarakis,et al.  Optimization tools for design and marketing of new/improved products using the house of quality , 1999 .

[37]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[38]  S. Bodily Note—A Delegation Process for Combining Individual Utility Functions , 1979 .

[39]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A fuzzy-logic-based decision-making approach for new product development , 2004 .

[40]  House of quality: A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Fuzzy Ratings and Utility Analysis in Preliminary Design Evaluation of Multiple Attributes , 1992 .

[42]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes , 1991 .