Group cohesiveness and extrinsic motivation in virtual groups: lessons from an action case study of electronic brainstorming

One form of group support system that has received much attention from cross-disciplinary research is electronic brainstorming (EBS). While it is generally held that group cohesiveness is lower in virtual settings that in face-to face interactions, it has also been argued that this does not matter in cognitive work such as idea generation. However, most work on EBS has been carried out in academic settings, and though such environments provide more control, they may be insufficient to capture all nuances of on-going office work. Hence, I describe an action case study of a failing attempt to introduce an EBS prototype in an organisational setting. The analysis suggests that virtual groups, counter to what is previously thought, need to establish and maintain a group identity. One circumstance under which this seems to be the case is in the existence of extrinsic rewards mechanisms.

[1]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[3]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[4]  Margaret Gilchrist,et al.  The psychology of creativity , 1972 .

[5]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain , 1991 .

[6]  Sara McNeil,et al.  Facilitation interaction, communication and collaboration in online courses , 2000 .

[7]  Rob Procter,et al.  An investigation of social loafing and social compensation in computer-supported cooperative work , 1999, GROUP.

[8]  Randolph B. Cooper,et al.  The Effect of Computer-Mediated Communication on Agreement and Acceptance , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Dick Stenmark The Mindpool Hybrid: A New Angle on EBS and Suggestion Systems , 2001 .

[10]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[12]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Recognising “success” and “failure”: evaluating groupware in a commercial context , 1997, GROUP.

[13]  Jan Ljungberg,et al.  Open source movements as a model for organising , 2000, ECIS.

[14]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[15]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  The effects of electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: An assessment of the empirical research , 1990 .

[16]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Modeling Cognitive Interactions During Group Brainstorming , 1998 .

[17]  M. Markus Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[18]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2017 .

[19]  M. Lynn Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[20]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: theory and design implications , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  A. Dennis,et al.  When a Group Is Not a Group , 1993 .

[22]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[23]  R. Spears,et al.  De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .

[24]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .

[25]  Dick Stenmark Asynchronous Brainstorm: An Intranet Application for Creativity , 1999, WebNet.

[26]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  The network communities of SeniorNet , 1999, ECSCW.

[27]  Dick Stenmark The role of intrinsic motivation when managing creative work , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. ICMIT 2000. 'Management in the 21st Century' (Cat. No.00EX457).

[28]  Graham Pervan A case for more case study research in group support systems , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[29]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organization of Organizational Interfaces. , 1988 .

[30]  David H. Bush,et al.  Corporate creativity: How innovation and improvement actually happen, by Alan G. Robinson and Sam Stern. (1997). San Francisco: Berrett‐Koehler. 258 pp., $29.95 cloth, $17.95 paper , 1999 .

[31]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Stimulating thinking in group decision making , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[32]  Dick Stenmark,et al.  The Mindpool hybrid: theorising a new angle on EBS and suggestion systems , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[34]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[35]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  What mix of video and audio is useful for small groups doing remote real-time design work? , 1995, CHI '95.