BEETLE SPECIES RESPONSES TO TROPICAL FOREST FRAGMENTATION

The effects of forest fragmentation on beetle species composition were investigated in an experimentally fragmented tropical forest landscape in Central Amazonia. Leaf-litter beetles were sampled at seven distances from the forest edge (0–420 m) along forest edge-to-interior transects in two 100-ha forest fragments and two continuous forest edges, and at an identical series of distances along two deep continuous forest transects. Additional samples were taken at the centers of two 10-ha forest fragments and two 1-ha fragments. This sampling regime allowed discrimination between edge and fragment area effects. Beetle species composition changed significantly and independently with both decreasing distance from forest edge and decreasing fragment area. Edge effects on species composition were mediated by six important environmental variables: air temperature, canopy height, percent ground cover of twigs, litter biomass, litter moisture content, and an air temperature × distance from edge interaction effect, due to the different temperature profiles of edges with differing edge vegetation density. Population densities of 15 of the 32 most abundant beetle species tested (47%) were significantly affected by forest fragmentation. Species responses were classified empirically into four major categories: (A) edge sensitive, area insensitive; (B) area sensitive, edge insensitive; (C) edge and area sensitive; and (D) edge and area insensitive. Within these categories, trends in density were either positive (deep-forest species), or negative (disturbed-area species), with species showing the full spectrum of responses to fragmentation. The vast majority of species were adversely affected. Estimated species loss rates from forest fragments were: 49.8% of common species from 1-ha fragments, 29.8% from 10-ha fragments, and 13.8% from 100-ha fragments. Declining density was a significant precursor of species loss from forest fragments, but other species that did not show significant population density responses to fragmentation were also absent from some fragments, presumably by chance. The probability of species loss from forest fragments was not correlated with body size or trophic group for the 32 common species, although for the entire beetle assemblage (993 species) proportions of species in different trophic groups changed significantly with fragmentation. Rarity and population variability (in undisturbed forest) were significant predictors of susceptibility to fragmentation. Surprisingly, though, common species were significantly more likely to become locally extinct in small fragments than rarer species. This lends empirical support to models of multispecies coexistence under disturbance that suggest competitively dominant but poorly dispersing species are the first to become extinct due to habitat destruction. Thus, rarer species are predicted to be better dispersers and better at persisting.

[1]  R. Didham,et al.  Edge Structure Determines the Magnitude of Changes in Microclimate and Vegetation Structure in Tropical Forest Fragments 1 , 1999 .

[2]  R. Didham,et al.  Trophic structure stability and extinction dynamics of beetles (Coleoptera) in tropical forest fragments , 1998 .

[3]  Michael L. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1997 .

[4]  R. Corlett,et al.  The conservation value of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Habitat Fragmentation and Extinction Thresholds in Spatially Explicit Models , 1996 .

[6]  H. Andrén,et al.  Population responses to habitat fragmentation: statistical power and the random sample hypothesis , 1996 .

[7]  R. Didham,et al.  Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  I. Turner Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. , 1996 .

[9]  Christopher Uhl,et al.  A comparative study of tree establishment in abandoned pasture and mature forest of eastern Amazonia , 1996 .

[10]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Food Webs in Space: An Island Biogeographic Perspective , 1996 .

[11]  V. Kapos,et al.  Complex edge effects on soil moisture and microclimate in central Amazonian forest , 1995, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[12]  C. L. Shafer Values and shortcomings of small reserves , 1995 .

[13]  C. Murcia Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  T. Schoener,et al.  Variation in the hymenopteran parasitoid fraction on Bahamian islands , 1995 .

[15]  Jay R. Malcolm,et al.  Edge effects in central Amazonian forest fragments , 1994 .

[16]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[17]  C. Margules,et al.  Constrasting Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on the Scorpion Cercophonius Squama and an Amphipod , 1994 .

[18]  P. Vitousek Beyond Global Warming: Ecology and Global Change , 1994 .

[19]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[20]  P. Hammond,et al.  Practical Approaches to the Estimation of the Extent of Biodiversity in Speciose Groups , 1994 .

[21]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Habitat Fragmentation, Species Loss, and Biological Control , 1994, Science.

[22]  M. Aizen,et al.  HABITAT FRAGMENTATION, NATIVE INSECT POLLINATORS, AND FERAL HONEY BEES IN ARGENTINE, "CHACO SERRANO"' , 1994 .

[23]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Population dynamic principles , 1994 .

[24]  M. Usher,et al.  Distribution of arthropod species across the margins of farm woodlands , 1994 .

[25]  Gregory M. Mikkelson How do food webs fall apart? A study of changes in trophic structure during relaxation on habitat fragments , 1993 .

[26]  B. Lamont,et al.  Population size and viability , 1993, Nature.

[27]  R. Gold,et al.  Distribution and seasonal and diurnal activity patterns of Eutrombicula alfreddugesi (Acari: Trombiculidae) in a forest edge ecosystem. , 1993, Journal of medical entomology.

[28]  Valerie Kapos,et al.  The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments A prospective comparison of fragments and continuous forest , 1992 .

[29]  Ghillean T. Prance,et al.  Preliminary results of a large-scale tree inventory of upland rain forest in the Central Amazon , 1992 .

[30]  R D Holt,et al.  Diverse and Contrasting Effects of Habitat Fragmentation , 1992, Science.

[31]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial scale mediates the influence of habitat fragmentation on dispersal success: Implications for conservation , 1992 .

[32]  R. B. Root,et al.  The significance of host patch edges to the colonization and development of Corythucha marmorata (Hemiptera: Tingidae) , 1992 .

[33]  Robert M. May,et al.  Dynamics of metapopulations : habitat destruction and competitive coexistence , 1992 .

[34]  C. Tracy,et al.  On the Determinants of Extinction , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[35]  P. Becker,et al.  More about euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments , 1991 .

[36]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  How Large Is a Species' Geographic Range? , 1991 .

[37]  W. Laurance Ecological Correlates of Extinction Proneness in Australian Tropical Rain Forest Mammals , 1991 .

[38]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review , 1991 .

[39]  D. Tessier,et al.  Changes in soil pore-space distribution following deforestation and revegetation: An example from the Central Amazon Basin, Brazil , 1991 .

[40]  J. Sayer,et al.  Tropical moist forests: Destruction and species extinction , 1991 .

[41]  W. Laurance,et al.  Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats , 1991 .

[42]  P. Kareiva Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data , 1990 .

[43]  N. Nadkarni,et al.  Invertebrates in canopy and ground organic matter in a neotropical montane forest, Costa Rica. , 1990 .

[44]  J. McCann,et al.  Influence of the intrastand position of black locust trees on attack rate of the locust borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). , 1990 .

[45]  B. Roitberg,et al.  A SEQUENTIAL SAMPLING PLAN FOR ADULT TUBER FLEA BEETLES (EPITRIX TUBERIS GENTNER): DEALING WITH “EDGE EFFECTS” , 1990, The Canadian Entomologist.

[46]  David A. Norton,et al.  Scale and the Spatial Concept of Fragmentation , 1990 .

[47]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  PATTERNS IN THE GEOGRAPHICAL RANGES OF SPECIES , 1990 .

[48]  P. Fearnside Fire in the Tropical Rain Forest of the Amazon Basin , 1990 .

[49]  P. Hammond Insect abundance and diversity in the Dumoga-Bone National Park, N. Sulawesi, with special reference to the beetle fauna of lowland rain forest in the Toraut region , 1990 .

[50]  Bert C. Klein Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Dung and Carrion Beetle Communities in Central Amazonia , 1989 .

[51]  F. W. Ravlin,et al.  Forest Edge Effects and Their Influence on Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Egg Mass Distribution , 1989 .

[52]  L. Harper The persistence of ant-following birds in small amazonian forest fragments , 1989 .

[53]  N. L. McKenzie,et al.  Patterns in the modern decline of western Australia's vertebrate fauna: Causes and conservation implications , 1989 .

[54]  P. M. Fearnside DEFORESTATION AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN BRAZILIAN AMAZONIA , 1989 .

[55]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  On the Risk of Extinction , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[56]  C. E. Bach,et al.  Effects of Host Plant Patch Size on Herbivore Density: Patterns , 1988 .

[57]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  The Current State of Biological Diversity , 1988 .

[58]  Distribution of Atta (Hymenoptera - Formicidae) in "terra-firme" rain forest of Central Amazonia: density, species composition and preliminary results on effects of forest fragmentation , 1988 .

[59]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [etrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1) , 1988 .

[60]  G. Powell,et al.  Population dynamics of male euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments , 1987 .

[61]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[62]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator–prey interactions , 1987, Nature.

[63]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[64]  G. Powell,et al.  Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments , 1986 .

[65]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Multivariate analysis in community ecology , 1984 .

[66]  A. Chauvel Os latossolos amarelos, álicos, argilosos dentro dos ecossistemas das bacias experimentais do INPA e da região vizinha , 1982 .

[67]  E. Leigh,et al.  The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[68]  C. Leck Avian Extinctions in an Isolated Tropical Wet-Forest Preserve, Ecuador , 1979 .

[69]  M. O. Hill,et al.  TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program of arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of individual and attributes , 1979 .

[70]  M. O. Hill,et al.  DECORANA - A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. , 1979 .

[71]  James H. Brown The theory of insular biogeography and the distribution of boreal birds and mammals , 1978 .

[72]  J. Lawton,et al.  Number of trophic levels in ecological communities , 1977, Nature.

[73]  Maria de Nazaré Góes Ribeiro Aspectos climatológicos de Manaus () , 1976 .

[74]  R. Whittaker Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .

[75]  L. Milne,et al.  The Balance of Nature , 1953, Oryx.